International Kazakhstan votes in favour of nuclear power plant construction, exit poll shows

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@red
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
7,777
Reaction score
9,822
  • Exit poll shows nearly 70% voted in favour of the plan
  • Central Election Commission says vote is valid
  • Project valued at $10-12 billion has faced public criticism
  • Plant would be built on shores of Lake Balkhash
maxresdefault.jpg

ULKEN, Almaty region, Kazakhstan, Oct 6 (Reuters) - Kazakhstan voted in a referendum on Sunday on whether to build its first nuclear power plant, and an exit poll showed voters backed the idea promoted by President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev's cabinet as a way to phase out polluting coal plants.

The plan has faced public criticism due to concerns about related hazards, the Soviet nuclear testing legacy, and fears that Russia will be involved in the project.

Almost 64% of registered voters cast their ballots by 8 p.m. local time (1500 GMT) when the polling stations closed, the Central Election Commission said, making the vote valid.

The Commission will announce preliminary results on Monday but an exit poll of about 284,000 voters showed 69.8% of them voted in favour of the plan, local pollster SOCIS-A said hours after the vote ended.

"I have come to the conclusion that the decision to build the nuclear power plant, and to build it with (Russian state nuclear firm) Rosatom, has already been made in (Tokayev's office) and the people of Kazakhstan are being invited to polling stations as 'notaries' to authenticate this decision with their votes," popular blogger Vadim Boreiko wrote.
t87m7zcwu5151.jpg

In the village of Ulken on the shores of Lake Balkhash, in the southeast of the country, which the cabinet has designated as the site to build the plant, some locals hoped the project would bring jobs. Others expressed concern about the impact on the quality of the lake water.

"I support the power plant," said Dametken Shulgeyeva, who has lived in the village of 1,200 people for more than 20 years. "This is our future."

Despite its sizeable natural gas reserves, the Central Asian nation of 20 million relies mostly on coal-powered plants for its electricity, supplemented by some hydroelectric plants and the growing renewable energy sector.

Kazakhstan already imports electricity, mostly from Russia, as its facilities, many of which are old, struggle to meet domestic demand. And coal is regarded as the most polluting energy source.

Simcity-131.jpg

SOVIET LEGACY

The government says a reliable energy supply is needed to supplement renewable sources such as solar and wind power, and, since Kazakhstan is one of the world's biggest uranium producers, nuclear power is a logical choice.

"In order not to remain on the sidelines of global progress, we must use our competitive advantages," Tokayev said ahead of the vote.
The former Soviet republic, however, does not enrich uranium to the point where it can be used as fuel. The cabinet estimates that a nuclear power plant would cost $10 billion-$12 billion to build and expects contractors to secure the financing.

hq720.jpg

Critics say the same goal could be achieved with gas-powered plants which, although they still use fossil fuel, are much less polluting than coal plants and come with less risk.

Kazakhstan was part of the Soviet Union in 1986 when the Chornobyl nuclear disaster occurred, and tens of thousands of Kazakhs took part in the subsequent clean-up operation that left many with lifelong health issues.

The country was also the site of hundreds of Soviet nuclear weapon tests which have made swathes of land uninhabitable, led to disease among people in nearby areas, and have made many people distrustful of anything nuclear.

Tokayev, who publicly cast his vote in the capital Astana told reporters he had no single country or company in mind as a potential contractor.

"My personal vision on this matter is that an international consortium would need to work in Kazakhstan made up of global companies that possess the most advanced technologies," he said.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-...whether-build-first-nuclear-plant-2024-10-06/
 
Concerning anytime a country bordering Russia builds something like this.

The USSR built Zaporizhzhia and the second Putin had a hissy fit it became a major danger for the whole continent of Europe.
 
Concerning anytime a country bordering Russia builds something like this.

The USSR built Zaporizhzhia and the second Putin had a hissy fit it became a major danger for the whole continent of Europe.
I understand where you're coming from, but nuclear energy could make a big difference to them

On the other hand, there could be nefarious intentions too. I don't know much about their leadership personally, do we have somebody here that knows Kazakhstan fairly well?
 
This is an afront to democracy, they should rather rely on clean Russian energy, supplied through nordstream 2, just as comrade Kamala and uncle Joe want

Otherwise the world will underwater in about 15 weeks, and yes you can trust my calculations
 
I understand where you're coming from, but nuclear energy could make a big difference to them

On the other hand, there could be nefarious intentions too. I don't know much about their leadership personally, do we have somebody here that knows Kazakhstan fairly well?

People hate the russians like hell but leadership is very pro rus, in the end it is ex soviet country which means divide between pro rus and anti rus exists
 
This is an afront to democracy, they should rather rely on clean Russian energy, supplied through nordstream 2, just as comrade Kamala and uncle Joe want

Otherwise the world will underwater in about 15 weeks, and yes you can trust my calculations

What?
 
Much depends on the design, who is going to build it and train the people to operate and maintain it.

If it Russia then the whole area and anyone down wind are truly fucked.

France should be the designer and supervisor for building and training.

The best I can think of in the EU anyway.
 
Back
Top