Well, this is the thing. From an outside perspective this election looks like the people running it were utterly incompetent. For starters, people involved in the election stand to benefit by certain results, and people overseeing procedures have a strong motivation against one candidate. That in itself is eyebrow raising but fair enough, I guess it happens, if it's all on the up up... But that's really the question, isn't it? When you have a slew of technical issues - some of which leave you scratching their head as to how someone could be so fucking stupid, paired with people being told to put their ballots into some box to be verified later, when you have account after account coming out of people saying "I couldn't vote," getting turned away from the polls and told to come back later, and so on, it's... Well, it looks sketchy as all hell.
I strongly, strongly suspect this will not lead to anything significant, but if you care about people trusting these elections, you need to publicly sort through what happened. There is far too much questionable shit going on around these elections and, in an environment where people are already skeptical of elections, a refusal to treat this seriously strongly suggests what I already suspect - that the other team thinks having the other side skeptical of elections lets them playing the "election denier!" card which is a winner for them politically. That's short term political gain trumping long term political healthy 101.