Kamala Harris There’s a big difference between equality and equity.

with that shrill, cackle and superficial personality? she's the type to fake an orgasm after just laying there like a dead fish.

LOL! Most likely, but even though I disagree with her on almost anything, I find her hot and my dick speaks for me.
 
First of all, this is a loaded question so I am not going to play along. I will say that the central message of the clip was "Its about giving people the essential resources and the help that they need." In other words giving aid and resources to underdeveloped communities so they can properly compete. This doesn't involve taking from successful people
It doesn't? Then where is all of the "aid and resources" coming from? Is she paying out of her own pocket?

The message was incoherent. Everyone can have the same shot, but if we don't start at the same place, we can't end up in the same place, so we need to start at the same place and end at the same place, and then we can compete? Is this thing on? Ending up in the same place is the exact opposite of competing.
 
Last edited:
The clip ended with "equality of outcome". Apparently you two either didn't watch it or didn't understand it either.

You need to watch it again. She clearly is pro competition. She again is about "giving people the resources and the support they need, so everyone can be on equal footing"
 

Enemies one minute, friends the next. Say anything to shit on someone else to get ahead then sweep it all under the rug and play nice later on to further yourself some more.

Politicians, especially on the Federal level, suck. It's all optics and smoke and mirrors. I've said it before and I'll say it again... there more honor in being a drug dealer than a politician.
 
DKsF8OGVAAAYIET.jpg:large
 
How many communist countries are there currently?

Seems your bar is low so I'd imagine half the oecd would be, right?
You really shouldn't be asking me these questions. Psychological warfare is being used on the West and the evidence proves what Yuri and the book those Chinese generals wrote is true.

The whole world will become communist if everyone's mind is controlled by the single narrative.
 
It doesn't? Then where is all of the "aid and resources" coming from? Is she paying out of her own pocket?

The message was incoherent. Everyone can have the same shot, but if we don't start at the same place, we can't end up in the same place, so we need to start at the same place and end at the same place, and then we can compete? Is this thing on? Ending up in the same place is the exact opposite of competing.

A. Who knows? Budget cutting? Selling off treasury bonds? The narcotics trade? Im not a politician.

B. She never states what "ending up in the same place" means though. Maybe she means home ownership. Maybe she means having a successful job. Or receiving quality education. What is clear however is the central message: "its about giving people the resources and support they need". Hardly an endorsement for bread lines and working for the State.
 
If you think that equity = communism then you don't know what the word means. If you think that Kamala Harris and Joe fucking Biden are secret commies, you don't know what that word means. You guys don't even know the difference between socialism, democratic socialism, and communism.
Under your definitions, most of the top countries in the world are Stalingrad.

Equity= soup kitchens, and labor camps
 
Last time a dem was in office, this stupid bathroom bill was passed and now our society doesn't know what a man or a woman is biologically and we have 72 genders.

Thanks, fucker.
Wow that's really the pressing issue of our day. Right-wing "populists" like yourself are the world's biggest useful idiots.

{<jordan}
 
The clip is dishonest in that it's suggesting that the black dude didn't make piss poor decisions in life, act like a low class thug yet still demand to be at the same spot as whitey.
This same clown will argue to the death that he's not racist and that to even suggest such a thing is ridiculous!

<{Heymansnicker}>
 
This same clown will argue to the death that he's not racist and that to even suggest such a thing is ridiculous!

<{Heymansnicker}>

It's because I operate in reality and do not believe in this idiotic notion called systemic racism.

If a person doesn't succeed as much as other people with comparable advantages, it's not because of anyone else but themselves.

My racist ass believes a black person has every ability and knowledge to make smart life decisions without needing to cast blame on everyone else.
 
Wow that's really the pressing issue of our day. Right-wing "populists" like yourself are the world's biggest useful idiots.

{<jordan}

Libtards wanna what? Add more gun restrictions thinking that will effect all those minority gangs from causing gun violence? And that's if your retarded ideology can even acknowledge the reality as to where most of america's gun violence comes from without being cock blocked by thinking you are racist for acknowledging that.

"Just wait until we make assault rifles illegal in america! That will show em!"

God speed lil doodle.
 
Last edited:
It's because I operate in reality and do not believe in this idiotic notion called systemic racism.

If a person doesn't succeed as much as other people with comparable advantages, it's not because of anyone else but themselves.

My racist ass believes a black person has every ability and knowledge to make smart life decisions without needing to cast blame on everyone else.
You could've just said that. Instead you said:
The clip is dishonest in that it's suggesting that the black dude didn't make piss poor decisions in life, act like a low class thug yet still demand to be at the same spot as whitey.
Yeah, not a good look, dog. ;)

First time around, you said what you really felt. This time around, you cleaned up the language a bit for plausible deniability. But the first post already gave you away.
 
You really shouldn't be asking me these questions. Psychological warfare is being used on the West and the evidence proves what Yuri and the book those Chinese generals wrote is true.

The whole world will become communist if everyone's mind is controlled by the single narrative.

That's a massive IF.
 
The issue is, we get the bigger point, which is moving goalposts towards socialist/communist viewpoints. Equity didn’t exist as a concept like this 10 years ago. Nor did the “wealth gap”. Nor did BLM.

But they are all used as wedges to make people jealous, unhappy and fracture our society, which is part of the Marxist agenda. You can’t have a class-based revolution without classes, so we need to invent new ones based on race, gender, etc etc.

And just in case some people are still that naive, 95% of that video was fine, but it was all a setup for the big lie at the end. Equality of outcome is a terrible, corrosive, unachievable goal.
That's why the commies say "if we ignore that last line", which is the foot in the door and the goal.

The video literally ends with "Equitable treatment means we all end up in the same place". That is equality of outcome.

Her video is masquerading as equality of opportunity, but the end result of it is equality of outcome.

Essentially, it's a load of horse shit. If we all have equality of opportunity and we compete, as the video suggests, we don't all end up in the same place. This is Marxist bullshit masquerading as equality of opportunity. It's designed to trick you.
Another good post.

You really shouldn't be asking me these questions. Psychological warfare is being used on the West and the evidence proves what Yuri and the book those Chinese generals wrote is true.

The whole world will become communist if everyone's mind is controlled by the single narrative.
Yes, it's not even surprising or a tinfoil. Didn't they remove laws that said it was illegal to use the media to lie to American citizens (foreign citizens were fair game), this was under Obama. All these things are happening.
 
Last edited:
Libtards wanna what? Add more gun restrictions thinking that will effect all those minority gangs from causing gun violence? And that's if your retarded ideology can even acknowledge the reality as to where most of america's gun violence comes from without being cock blocked by thinking you are racist for acknowledging that.

"Just wait until we make assault rifles illegal in america! That will show em!"

God speed lil doodle.
I'm pro-2nd Amendment. I think leftists should start arming ourselves and get prepared to defend ourselves if worse comes to worst. It's not good that the other side currently has a large gun ownership and tactical advantage. But "libtards" who vote for gun control when gun violence and mass shootings are an actual serious problem in the US, are still smarter than right-wing "populists" who vote against their own self-interest because of who goes to pee in what bathroom.

{<jordan}
 
You need to watch it again. She clearly is pro competition. She again is about "giving people the resources and the support they need, so everyone can be on equal footing"

The video literally ends with "Equitable treatment means we all end up in the same place". That is equality of outcome.

Her video is masquerading as equality of opportunity, but the end result of it is equality of outcome.

Essentially, it's a load of horse shit. If we all have equality of opportunity and we compete, as the video suggests, we don't all end up in the same place. This is Marxist bullshit masquerading as equality of opportunity. It's designed to trick you.
 
Isn't that video racist? Why does the black guy have to be below sea level, and the white guy is half way up the rock? I mean, if that were Dwayne Johnson and some average poor white guy, Dwayne would be half way up the rock (no pun intended) and they white guy would be below sea level. Does that mean Dwayne owes the poor white guy some kind of handicapped to help them climb to the same exact level?

When black people finally got equal rights under the law, for every $100 a white family had, a black family had $5.04.

To act like a generational wealth gap can be corrected with no real action in 55 years is a bit ridiculous.

Your rock example is terrible. Highlighting individual outlier scenarios does nothing to solve systemic problems.
 
You’re acting like everybody’s entitled to a bike in 1st place....

not only do you want to interfere and give everybody a personalized bike, you insist they go at the same speed and all arrive at the same time.

you’re basically penalizing the person who choose the right size bike and who can pedal better by making his/her bike not as good so others, who didn’t choose the right bike and can’t pedal as well, can catch up

You are assuming that the person chose the right size bike using his intelligence and superior foresight. What if he was gifted that bike via inheritance?
 
Back
Top