Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

[High Test With da Best]

I was being sarcastic

Lol; go easy on @GearSolidMetal he's still acclimating to the WR and her personalities

 

[mommas homeboy]

Megan Kelly is such a phony. She was a never Trumper until she got fired from her 'reborn as a liberal girl boss' show and now she hugs his nuts like crazy.

I listen to her a lot, but you have a good point. Why the fuck did she go from Fox to NBC, then start a conservative podcast, unless all she cares about is money and has no core principles?

 

[PEB]

It takes guts because she’s putting her entire reputation on the line by deviating so dramatically from the other polls. If Trump wins Iowa shes going to become a meme and no one will take her polls serious ever again.

See this is the problem Nate Silver brings up that all the polls come up around the same numbers? what are the odds that you could have so many different polls with basically the same numbers? Nate Silver called it hurding due to the fact no one wants to take that risk. I did not want to bring this up Historian Allen Lichtman who has been 100 percent since 2004 says his key points put Harris as the winner and went on the announce it because he felt his standing on the issue. But since then there has been threats to him and his family. Her poll dates back to 1996 and she has success rate of over 95 percent. What differentiates her is she only concerned about Iowa not a number of swing states like other polling agencies. Polling sample sizes have ben put into question as many national polls have a sample size of 1000 to 1500 that seems odd to.

Historian Allan Lich​

 

[GearSolidMetal]

I listen to her a lot, but you have a good point. Why the fuck did she go from Fox to NBC, then start a conservative podcast, unless all she cares about is money and has no core principles?

She's in the same boat as Tucker Carlson.
'Say what the audience wants to hear, and you'll get money thrown at you.'

Though with Meghan, its much more obvious she's a grifter.
She was a conservative darling when she first csme to FOX, then when she got her own primetime show she became the Anti-Trumper of the network.
Her contract expired and continued to be an Anti-Trumper at NBC... and her ratings were horrible, she gave them the excuse to fire her, but she got her complete contract earnings.... and now she's back to being the conservative darling on her own podcast.

I remember she was so pissed after the Trump/Kamala debate saying the moderators were the worst in debate history... and I'm thinking...

...she has the least credibility of anyone on the planet to question any moderator's debate questions.

 

[Err]

See this is the problem Nate Silver brings up that all the polls come up around the same numbers? what are the odds that you could have so many different polls with basically the same numbers? Nate Silver called it hurding due to the fact no one wants to take that risk. I did not want to bring this up Historian Allen Lichtman who has been 100 percent since 2004 says his key points put Harris as the winner and went on the announce it because he felt his standing on the issue. But since then there has been threats to him and his family. Her poll dates back to 1996 and she has success rate of over 95 percent. What differentiates her is she only concerned about Iowa not a number of swing states like other polling agencies. Polling sample sizes have ben put into question as many national polls have a sample size of 1000 to 1500 that seems odd to.

Historian Allan Lich​

That’s the whole point of polls, you get multiple pollsters taking samples and they SHOULD have numbers that are all within the same range if their methodology isn’t tainted. Thats how a prediction is made. Iowa was +12 Republican in 2022, it’s not going to swing to +4 Democrat within 2 years. Go ahead and @ me if it happens and I’ll eat my words, but the Selzer poll is out to lunch.

 

[chardog]

She’s just really into white guys

 

[ShadowRun]

He also said he thinks Trump will win

Minor details bro

 

[Deleted member 267581]

Food. Price Controls. Kamala Harris has said it multiple times.

Right back at ya with Trump and tarrifs on what private companies have to pay.

Energy. Subsidizing Wind and Solar over other sources.

The Biden administration oversaw the oil industry drill the most amount of oil in U.S. history,

Healthcare - Obamacare

Obamacare doesn’t eliminate private enterprise dumbass lol.

Information Media - Network News Licenses (ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR)

How about the largest media channel in the U.S. Fox News? Ahhhh lol

 

[Deleted member 267581]

You side is fear-mongering about what Trump might do as President, usually related to Project 2025 or whatever shit hosts from The View have been spewing.

What if Trumpers say "What is he doing right now?"

Obvious answer : Nothing, because he's not in power, just like the Democrats have the White House but not the House or enough seats in the senate to get anything substantial passed.

But what do the Democrats want to pass?
Lets ask Kamala, who might be President-elect in 65+ hours from now :

She has said she’s not for taking away all guns. Just assault weapon bans.

That little clip posted something about a reporter saying “adding to your gun control agenda”

Yet the caption above said gun ban. Is that not the fear mongering you mentioning?

 

[Err]

She has said she’s not for taking away all guns. Just assault weapon bans.

That little clip posted something about a reporter saying “adding to your gun control agenda”

Yet the caption above said gun ban. Is that not the fear mongering you mentioning?

What’s an assault weapon?

 

[nostradumbass]

Sadly, I agree. The Democratic scumbags controlling how the elections are run are actually the biggest X factor. If there were a way for them to steal the election without getting caught, would they do it?

1000% they would. They see Trump is a Hitler reincarnate who will murder millions and lock up dissenters up if he gets elected.

They never seem to want to answer whether they believe the democrats wouldn't cheat if they could, or they would if they could but it's not possible, because both stances are ridiculous. Obviously they would, and the entire point of removing mechanisms to catch it is so they can.

I mean all the states Harris needs have democrat governors, democrat secretaries of state. The Michigan SoS already tried to have Trump's name taken off the ballot entirely, fought to keep RFK off until he suspended his campaign and endorsed Trump, then told him he had to keep his name on a ballot he didn't want to be on, but were fighting to keep Cornel West off who did want to be on it. Oh yeah, Gretchen Whitmer and Jocelyn Beson are totally motivated to find fraud so they can certify "literally Hitler" as president.

Unfortunately, elections have gone from pretty easy show up, vote and we get the results on election day, and shifted most of it over to an administrative and procedural battle with people whose entire message is that their opponent is literally Hitler and has to be stopped by any means necessary. 2 act blue donors have tried to shoot him, 1/3 of democrats supported the assasination attempt and regretted that it failed, but somehow we're supposed to believe that forged ballots, sketchy counts and looking the other way on ineligible voters would be a bridge too far when their candidate is only there in the first place because of a coup?

 

[Deleted member 267581]

They never seem to want to answer whether they believe the democrats wouldn't cheat if they could, or they would if they could but it's not possible, because both stances are ridiculous. Obviously they would, and the entire point of removing mechanisms to catch it is so they can.

I mean all the states Harris needs have democrat governors, democrat secretaries of state. The Michigan SoS already tried to have Trump's name taken off the ballot entirely, fought to keep RFK off until he suspended his campaign and endorsed Trump, then told him he had to keep his name on a ballot he didn't want to be on, but were fighting to keep Cornel West off who did want to be on it. Oh yeah, Gretchen Whitmer and Jocelyn Beson are totally motivated to find fraud so they can certify "literally Hitler" as president.

Unfortunately, elections have gone from pretty easy show up, vote and we get the results on election day, and shifted most of it over to an administrative and procedural battle with people whose entire message is that their opponent is literally Hitler and has to be stopped by any means necessary. 2 act blue donors have tried to shoot him, 1/3 of democrats supported the assasination attempt and regretted that it failed, but somehow we're supposed to believe that forged ballots, sketchy counts and looking the other way on ineligible voters would be a bridge too far when their candidate is only there in the first place because of a coup?

lol you basically have no argument you support someone who literally tried to get his vp to overturn the election. If Kamala did that what would you be saying ?

 

[PEB]

Trumpster circle jerk on Kamala Harris thread lol. Like they say if you have no good ideas trash to ones with good ideas.

Elon going to run the economy into the ground according to him.

 

[Jeffy37]

Dr Phil will be next, followed by Kid Rock and that racist pig Hulk Hogan.

My favourite from your list was Hershill Walker though, the guy who was all about family values and anti-abortion with a son he was rarely around for and hates him and paying for two abortions.

Shit people on both sides. We talking about former NFL players now. Did you happen to see Ryan Clark's speech on nick bosa?

 

[fingercuffs]

Shit people on both sides. We talking about former NFL players now. Did you happen to see Ryan Clark's speech on nick bosa?

I was aware of the Bosas MAGA stuff but had to Google Ryan.

 

[Jeffy37]

I was aware of the Bosas MAGA stuff but had to Google Ryan.

I'm just trying to say a person wearing a MAGA is racist. In his words basically.

 

[filthybliss]

@filthybliss as a young and reasonable person on the left, how does the fact she runs two opposing ads in different places play with you?

I don’t like it. I hate how much Israel is involved in our politics too. Voicing basic concerns for Palestinian human life is considered “Pro-Hamas” and “Anti-Semitic”.

 

[Rob Battisti]

I don’t like it. I hate how much Israel is involved in our politics too. Voicing basic concerns for Palestinian human life is considered “Pro-Hamas” and “Anti-Semitic”.

My biggest issue with her is that she seems to literally have zero beliefs that she sticks to aside from what will get her elected even more than a normal politician. this is so egregious literally two different policy positions for the sole purpose of gaining votes.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

She has said she’s not for taking away all guns. Just assault weapon bans.

Oh sure, she's been completely truthful with no record of dishonesty... like giving a rational explanation why she went from a 'buy-back program' to an assault rifle ban... which wasn't effective the first time.

That little clip posted something about a reporter saying “adding to your gun control agenda”

Yet the caption above said gun ban. Is that not the fear mongering you mentioning?

This is why everybody knows Democrats are lying when they claim they only want to take assault rifles -

"Kamala Harris, as a 2019 presidential primary candidate, said, "I support a mandatory gun buyback program" for assault weapons."

Democrats always cite gun crime and homicides that the country is in a crysis... yet they don't want to 'buy back' handguns? Which are used in 90+% of violent crimes?

Apparently not, they claim they ONLY want assault rifles, used in a small fraction of gun crime, and they'll be satisfied with that?

No, but only Democrat voters are gullible enough to believe that. Being able to successfully ban the manufacturing, sales, and then 'buy back' all assault rifles privately owned will be a gateway to then do the same for handguns... in theory.

But as I stated earlier, there's so many firearms it'd be impossible to confiscate them, and very few would be willing to 'sell back' their weapons for a small fraction of what they're worth.

"Attorneys for the state noted that such guns comprise only 3 percent of the total civilian arsenal of approximately 310 million firearms, citing a 2012 Congressional Research Service report."

"Do the math and it works out to between 15 and 20 million modern sporting rifles now in circulation."

How Many Assault Weapons Do Americans Own?

A seemingly simple reader question about military-style rifles exposes disputed definitions and gaping holes in government record-keeping.

www.thetrace.org

And it wouldn't get that far anyway, such a law would be blatantly unconstitutional and it'd be slapped down by the courts in record time.

 

[SurferH2O]

Right back at ya with Trump and tarrifs on what private companies have to pay.





The Biden administration oversaw the oil industry drill the most amount of oil in U.S. history,



Obamacare doesn’t eliminate private enterprise dumbass lol.





How about the largest media channel in the U.S. Fox News? Ahhhh lol

You were better off not responding. You're not informed, but I get it... you're a Democrat / Leftist.

1. Whataboutism. You may want to watch the Joe Rogan interview where Trump goes into the history of Tariffs and how they made the U.S.A. flush with treasures. You do realize Biden kept the Trump tariffs? Why?
2. They shut down pipelines, drilling, refinery expansion, and more. We were a net exporter prior. Why did Biden/Harris have to tap our National Reserve and sell it to the Chinese?
3. It competes with private markets through subsidies. It dictates healthcare. It forced people to lose their doctors and their plans... therefor the government is in the market - that's Socialism
4. Fox News is not Broadcast News and there is a real distinction legally and always has been. How do you not know about Public Airwaves?

No one will adore you if you keep spouting off nonsense.