Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

[Jacket time]

Looks like someone close to old man Donold is against IVF.

nah

t minus 4 mins

 

[Strychnine]

@Strychnine
How conservative is savannah? I understand it's republican but what is it like today?

My cousin got there early!

She says it was packed to the rafters as your vid clearly shows.

 

[Islam Imamate]

He did go to his DOJ and other officials for help besides Barr and they tried to indict that person, Jeff Clark and others , along with jailing peter Navarro. It was not like everyone told him off.

Oh the fact that you know about Jeffrey Clark is telling. Yes Jeffrey Clark was willing to help Trump with his scheme, that is why he was indicted. From the Jack Smith indictment(Co-Conspirator 4 is Jeffrey Clark):

On December 22, the Defendant met with Co-Conspirator 4 at the White House. Co-Conspirator 4 had not informed his leadership at the Justice Department of the meeting, which was a violation of the Justice Department's written policy restricting contacts with the White House to guard against improper political influence. On December 26, Co-Conspirator 4 spoke on the phone with the Acting Attorney General and lied about the circumstances of his meeting with the Defendant at the White House, falsely claiming that the meeting had been unplanned. The Acting Attorney General directed Co-Conspirator 4 not to have unauthorized contacts with the White House again, and Co-Conspirator 4 said he would not.

The next morning, on December 27, contrary to the Acting Attorney General's direction, Co-Conspirator 4 spoke with the Defendant on the Defendant's cell phone for nearly three minutes.

And what did he talk about with Trump during that meeting and over the phone? Here's what Trump had to say later that afternoon to acting AG and Deputy AG

That afternoon, the Defendant called the Acting Attorney General and Acting Deputy Attorney General and said, among other things, "People tell me [Co-Conspirator 4] is great. I should put him in." The Defendant also raised multiple false claims of election fraud, which the Acting Attorney General and Acting Deputy Attorney General refuted. When the Acting Attorney General told the Defendant that the Justice Department could not and would not change the outcome of the election, the Defendant responded, "Just say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican congressmen."

He's meeting directly with Trump against DOJ protocol which exists precisely to prevent this kind of political influence. Clark is promising to help overturn the election and for that Trump is promising to make him Attorney General.

Also on the morning of January 3, Co-Conspirator 4 met with the Defendant at the White House—again without having informed senior Justice Department officials—and accepted the Defendant's offer that he become Acting Attorney General.

Here's why that didn't work

The Defendant moved immediately from this national security briefing to the meeting that the Acting Attorney General had requested earlier that day, which included Co Conspirator 4, the Acting Attorney General, the Acting Deputy Attorney General, the Justice Department's Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, the White House Counsel, a Deputy White House Counsel, and a Senior Advisor. At the meeting, the Defendant expressed frustration with the Acting Attorney General for failing to do anything to overturn the election results, and the group discussed Co-Conspirator 4's plans to investigate purported election fraud and to send his proposed letter to state officials—a copy of which was provided to the Defendant during the meeting. The Defendant relented in his plan to replace the Acting Attorney General with Co-Conspirator 4 only when he was told that it would result in mass resignations at he Justice Department and of his own White House Counsel.

Why do you think the members of the DOJ threatened to resign en masse when Trump was trying to appoint Jeffrey Clark as AG and use the DOJ to overturn the election?

 

[Jacket time]

 

[Scerpi]

Some of the dopes in this thread need this public service announcement

 

[rearnakedchoke]

LOL MAGA are a bunch of nuts.

That same guy the other day said that us generals would have their way with Kamala. Even the fox ladies called him out.

 

[rearnakedchoke]

Is Vance saying Kamala is as dumb as a trump voter?

I guess that’s not the own he was looking for.

 

[sickc0d3r]

I know it is hard for you to digest. But the same people who told you the election was free and fair and that Trump stopped the peaceful transfer of power, they also told you Joe Biden didn’t have dementia, sharp as a tack, the economy is the best ever, the border isn’t a problem, that Russia stole the 2016 election, including Kamala Harris, who also says voting machines are not to be trusted.

Not worth discussing beyond that. Sorry we disagree, but you are free to believe what you want

The same people who told us what? You mean the judges in the courts that laughed at Trump’s lawyers and kicked them to the curb 60+ times, or the lawyers themselves who never once actually alleged fraud? What were they telling us?
Or maybe it was the people who recounted all those votes and ended up telling us that Biden won by an even bigger margin? Or are you talking about all of Trump’s henchmen who told him he lost get over it, should we be listening to them? Maybe it’s the fake electors who’re all facing charges, are they telling us stuff? Please enlighten us. Surely you’re not saying it’s all a democrat conspiracy that’s keeping us from the truth.

TL/DR: Your meds aren’t working, up the dosage.

 

[fingercuffs]

The same people who told us what? You mean the judges in the courts that laughed at Trump’s lawyers and kicked them to the curb 60+ times, or the lawyers themselves who never once actually alleged fraud? What were they telling us?
Or maybe it was the people who recounted all those votes and ended up telling us that Biden won by an even bigger margin? Or are you talking about all of Trump’s henchmen who told him he lost get over it, should we be listening to them? Maybe it’s the fake electors who’re all facing charges, are they telling us stuff? Please enlighten us. Surely you’re not saying it’s all a democrat conspiracy that’s keeping us from the truth.

TL/DR: Your meds aren’t working, up the dosage.

Whenever I bring up that Mango Molester appointed his own people to investigate him losing the election lies and found Biden won by even more than was counted they head for the hills.

 

[sickc0d3r]

Whenever I bring up that Mango Molester appointed his own people to investigate him losing the election lies and found Biden won by even more than was counted they head for the hills.

That’s because they’re full of shit and they know it.

 

[fingercuffs]

That’s because they’re full of shit and they know it.

They literally run off. Biden won by MORE and they leg it.

 

[ShadowRun]

No one needs to steal anything. She’s going to blow Donald out of the water

Blow is what she's good at, but I think you are wrong. Trump takes the W unless something major happens with court. Care to bet Sherbro?

 

[Joe]

 

[PEB]

 

[Helden]

If you've heard a minute of Trump talking, you've pretty much heard everything.
He can ramble on for an hour, saying a slightly different version of the same childish talking points and insults.

 

[ShadowRun]

LOL she is a walking SNL skit

 

[Rob Battisti]

Blow is what she's good at, but I think you are wrong. Trump takes the W unless something major happens with court. Care to bet Sherbro?

Unfortunately I would bet that Harris will win. I’m like 70/30 at this point in her favor.

 

[Andy Capp]

LOL third time I've seen this posted. The bots are out in full force. And you lot call others NPC's.

Cope a little harder; the election is still a couple of months away.

 

[Andy Capp]

Unfortunately I would bet that Harris will win. I’m like 70/30 at this point in her favor.

 

[Rob Battisti]

RIP my life