The judge is an obvious political hack.
You can cops and seethe there's no evidence to back up the accuser's story, and you still can't find any other rape victim who can't even recall what year their rape happened in.
i don't see any answers to my questions, matter of fact you even edited that part out of my quote so it's not like you didn't see it.
cluckedy cluck cluck cluckedy cluck cluck look at this chud tuck.
fortunately for you, i can also spin around in circles all day too! so i am just going to ask you these 3 easy yes/no questions for the
third time now, and you are either going to answer them, or you are going to tuck your dick and start clucking some more.
1) if i was in new york and i were to shove my fingers, my whole fist, my whole arm, a broken broom handle, a rubber chicken, or the eiffel tower unwillingly up your wife and mothers twats, and they didn't consent to any of it, would you not say that i raped them?
2) if i was in new york and i unwillingly shoved my cock deep up your wife and mothers assholes , would i not be considered to be a rapist in any sense of the term?
3) if your wife and mother cant remember off the top of their heads the exact moment in time when i done all of those ungodly things to them, does this prove that it never happened?
remember, yes or no answers. you're not going to play semantics with me maga muppet.
imagine reducing yourself to becoming a rape apologist just to own the libs.