- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 37,247
- Reaction score
- 61,433
lol yeah that is a little concerning.
Biden didn’t do anything to firearms this admin(AFAIK) and I wouldn’t guess she would be able to do too much
lol yeah that is a little concerning.
He agreed to debate Joe, you could try be intellectually honest.
But I do think he should debate Harris and I bet you he will wanna do some kind of official bet ?
No I don't and neither does most reasonable Trump supporters. Doesn't chsnge the fact Kamala is levels worse of a potential potus than cadaver Biden or Trump.
Now if your party nominated a person like Manchin or even Beshear ...... I like canidates that are gov/Sen in opposite party to their state . They tend to be the best at working g with both sides as they have had to. That would be an excuse to not vote Trump. But you go from left to far left no thanks. At least I have seen Trump in office an itcwasnt that bad..
Republicans should concern themselves with their nominee and not the Democrats, the people will speak at the ballot box.
Swing state voters telling MSNB they don't trust Kamala Harris and Biden's staff.
RFK is going to pull voters from Trump in the critical swing states and not Kamala. Basically do what Ralph Nadar did to Al Gore.
Trump is a plaything for dictators. All they have to do is compliment him and he’ll give them whatever they want. He’s absurdly narcissistic.Yes I think a candidate's foreign policy should be a factor when selecting a president. It maybe be the only area where they pretty much have complete control over so an important consideration when voting. What happens abroad very much effects what happens at home when you are spending hundreds of billions funding forever wars.
If it is known that he is unfit to run for president then why are you upset that he was pushed out of running?
I will ALWAYS do this.
You didn't address anything I said about her qualifications.
Put her resume against pre-president Trump, Obama, GW? Put her brain against the brain of the walking corpse of Biden. How is she that much less qualified compared to them?
How about you list all of the things that previous Vice Presidents accomplished? Why are we pretending like the VP isn't much more than a ceremonial position? They don't do much in the spotlight. What did Pence do?
It just sounds like a lot of projection on your part. Don't have to be a fan of Kamala to want her, (aka the Democratic party) to defeat Trump/the Republican party. But if yall are going to say she's not qualified, then you have to actually back that up with an argument, not just state it as if it were a fact.
Of course I would have wanted more of a Democratic process, but, as I said, it's not like we have many options this late in the game. There's simply not enough time to vet a new person and build up the money and support for an entirely new person. There's already a team and system in place for Kamala, and she'd be the obvious choice because she was the VP. She isn't some random woman they plucked out of the sky.
It's not like Trump actually even competed in his primaries. He didn't even debate anyone.
Again, youre playing games with the VP position. We all know damn well the VP is the 2nd most powerful person in government in theory only. The speaker of the house or the senate majority leader has more actual power than she does.
Republicans did not want to work with Dems on the border anyways, so we can just stop pretending with that fantasy as well.
If she ran on:
Cutting support to Israel to stop the genocide in Gaza
Firing Gensler and being more crypto friendly
Nothing crazy in terms of “banning guns” or “abortion free for all”
To me, it’s all BS so if a president was very pro-crypto it would mean I achieve financial freedom earlier. Thus, I would consider the vote.
She slept her way to the vice presidency? She had a relationship with Brown that probably helped her get to the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board in CA, but how many other members of that board have you heard of? Newsom volunteered for Brown and got put on the Parking and Traffic Commission. Does that invalidate everything he's done afterwards? Vance's relationship with Thiel has probably never been sexual, but it has played a much bigger role in his advance to the VP candidacy than Harris's relationship with Brown played in hers.Take the Oral out, that was just a joke. Do you think it's on the level to appoint someone to high positions in government that you are sleeping with? A 29 year old Harris did "date" former San Francisco Mayor and State Assembly Speaker Willie Brown who was 60, for a period of time between 1994 to 1995. In his capacity as speaker, Brown appointed her to two political posts — first to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, and then to the Medical Assistance Commission. She would not be here today if not for those appointments that started her career. She was a young somewhat attractive women "dating" an old man that may have been estranged from a wife, but was not divorced. All of this is verified as true. Take the oral out, she slept her way to her job, is that better?
Insults without addressing the issue. Big surprise. The dems have real problems and all you do is gripe about me.Why do you incessantly open your big yapper to complain that democrats aren't doing this or that when you will never, ever vote for one? Ohhhh but the poor base! Trust Skysolo, he knows what you need, even though he actually doesn't.
lol... She's going to have face all these statements from 2019/2020 in the coming months.
She openly stated several times that she wants a mandatory buyback program
And she refuses to state which week in a pregnacy she would support protecting abortions... She's such a worm
There's a reason she was rated as the further left Senator in 2019
The leaked part of RFK Jr. phone call with Donald Trump. I think Trump offered RFK Jr. a position within his cabinet.He will end up dropping out and endorse Trump
Honest question -
Which circumstances should Democrats criticizing the nomination process of the Republican nominee be replied to with - "Democrats should concern themselves with their nominee and not the Republicans, the people will speak at the ballot box."
Otherwise, this seems like a one-way-street talkingpoint.
Because the Democrats pointing out no Republicans voted for the Republican nominee in the primaries should absolutely be a relevant issue.
In this case with Kamala Harris, its a non-hood way to way "Bitch, no one likes you."
Harris is for democracy and freedom right? What a joke... At some point people have to wake up and see everything these liars tell you is projection and obfuscation, they claim to be for democracy while shitting on democracy at every turn (making up rules to exclude RFK, stealing political donations, manipulating statistic and lying about them, forcing a candidate in who has zero support from voters, harping on the overturning of roe v Wade as if it's antidemocratic when it's 100% more democratic by letting the people choose as opposed to being told by the government what to do... Etc)
Freedom by fabricating claims then using lawfare tactics to cheat convictions on their leading political opponent, forcing cases against someone for something they're far more guilty of or actually guilty of, imprisoning people using their partial, selective facts and running with conspiracy theories that are demonstrably false to attempt to lie enough about a scenario as to make it believed...
All while claiming someone else is doing this and they're not and they care about not doing it because you do... They'll claim Trump will ban abortions, he said he won't, they claim Trump is for project 25 or whatever it is, he says he definitely isn't, racist sexist grab pussy, good people on both sides, Russia, diplomacy is bad, and on and on... people with eyes to see and ears to hear are over the bullshit...
Stop being so mad and working yourself up, Trump is the old man standard bearer for the Republicans, and Kamala on short time is now being pushed to the top of the ticket I have not heard any widespread dissent amongst the Democratic party opposing her or challenging the party to play in the race, if so they keeping it buried to show unity and using that good energy, new money and enthusiasm that was lacking with Joe.
The only whining and crying I'm hearing to all of it is from the Republicans who now seem to be crying to have Biden back. Formulate good arguments against the woman devoid of usual sexist, racist, demeaning tropes because that will only turn those suburban white women away who already can't stomach Trump. Like it or not Harris looks to be the one at this point Republicans need to do a better job of just dealing with it.