Elections Kamala Harris for POTUS

Most Democrats approved of her replacing Biden as the incumbent nominee. What are you crying about? Miss me with that bullshit about caring about democracy.

The accusation is a confession, some of these Trumpers know deep down Trump tried to steal the election and are desperate for anyway to morally equivocate with the Stop the Steal campaign. For the most part they know they're BS arguments so there's really not a lot of layers to them. Push back just a little and like the piglet's house of straw it falls and they move on to the next talking point as if the first one never happened.
 
The accusation is a confession, some of these Trumpers know deep down Trump tried to steal the election and are desperate for anyway to morally equivocate with the Stop the Steal campaign. For the most part they know they're BS arguments so there's really not a lot of layers to them. Push back just a little and like the piglet's house of straw it falls and they move on to the next talking point as if the first one never happened.
Man, I just asked a terminal Trump defender from bumfuck who knows where, what policies of his that they liked and they literally couldn’t come up with a single example. The chokehold that Trump has on these dumbasses needs to be studied.

The ones claiming election fraud to this day have yet to provide any actual evidence. You know it’s bad when even Tucker Carlson concedes that Diaper Don lost fair and square.
 
Those are great and straight forward questions! Any on the Left want to answer?


We understood from Democrats that "Democracy is on the ballot". If so, how does a Democrat Party voter vote against Kamala Harris?

What if they are pissed that Kamala Harris helped hide from the nation that Joe Biden has been POTATUS for a very long time?

How do they vote to keep democracy on the ballot?



Clown World. 🤡

Kamala is literally the Vice President, she was in the Biden ticket and most Democrats realize it was a big possibility that Biden would not finish a theoretical second term.

That's the whole purpose of having a VP.
 
I have to strongly disagree on the impeachment part here. The proposition to impeach a POTUS is a very serious and solemn one, I think. Prior to Trump, it had only come up twice in our nation’s entire history, 3 times if we count Nixon (articles were drafted and we were certainly headed towards impeachment had he not resigned).
And she can’t take a stand on it one way or the other?? That is what I loathe about Tulsi the most, her spinelessness. And she had the balls to run to be the leader of the free world? Why would I want a POTUS who can’t take a stand?

That reasoning she laid out, that she couldn’t support “the culmination of a partisan process, fueled by tribal animosities that have so gravely divided our country”? I have news for Tulsi: That’s what the impeachment process is. It’s always been partisan, it’s always been divided, that’s what it is by nature and probably will always be. You can’t just do nothing because an issue is contentious, that’s not how leadership works.

To your other points: if Tulsi found flaws in the $15/hr min wage bill, something she supported and was campaigning on, she should’ve had the balls to vote “No” and say why. I have no respect for her “Present” vote,
I also thought her attacks on Kamala were misleading, and her attacks on Pete were outright nonsense.

Why she because a darling of the Right is kind of a mystery to me. The rest of her 2020 platform were things like Medicare For All, banning assault weapons, free college, abortion with very few restrictions, eliminating fossil fuel dependency, abolishing the electoral college…. I generally support those things, but so do a lot of other liberal Dems that I like a whole lot better than Tulsi.

I have to respect her position on the impeachment to be honest. I took it as her basically saying"Trump is crooked, but this impeachment is about weaponizing the democratic process". She agrees Trump is a crook, but the reasons for that impeachment weren't just.

In terms of the $15 wage bill, could her way of voting be viewed as a way to say she supports the general idea, but not that specific bill. Not perfect, but better than voting yes just because. That bill was initially linked into covid funding, before being removed and not covering wide groups of people like farm hands etc. They basically put a 15$ minimum wage iun place only for big business and food servers, whilst ignoring massive groups of the population(who historically don't vote left).

Her attacks on Kamala were hilarious. No idea on Pete. I am not American so have to follow things pretty hard to be up to date.

Again, not American. Were I am we have medicare, gun laws, abortion etc. Just an outsider looking in and she seems like a good middle of the ground politician to steal some right leaning voters, that don't want Trump in the whitehouse again.
 
I have to strongly disagree on the impeachment part here. The proposition to impeach a POTUS is a very serious and solemn one, I think. Prior to Trump, it had only come up twice in our nation’s entire history, 3 times if we count Nixon (articles were drafted and we were certainly headed towards impeachment had he not resigned).
And she can’t take a stand on it one way or the other?? That is what I loathe about Tulsi the most, her spinelessness. And she had the balls to run to be the leader of the free world? Why would I want a POTUS who can’t take a stand?

That reasoning she laid out, that she couldn’t support “the culmination of a partisan process, fueled by tribal animosities that have so gravely divided our country”? I have news for Tulsi: That’s what the impeachment process is. It’s always been partisan, it’s always been divided, that’s what it is by nature and probably will always be. You can’t just do nothing because an issue is contentious, that’s not how leadership works.

To your other points: if Tulsi found flaws in the $15/hr min wage bill, something she supported and was campaigning on, she should’ve had the balls to vote “No” and say why. I have no respect for her “Present” vote,
I also thought her attacks on Kamala were misleading, and her attacks on Pete were outright nonsense.

Why she because a darling of the Right is kind of a mystery to me. The rest of her 2020 platform were things like Medicare For All, banning assault weapons, free college, abortion with very few restrictions, eliminating fossil fuel dependency, abolishing the electoral college…. I generally support those things, but so do a lot of other liberal Dems that I like a whole lot better than Tulsi.
The 2nd impeachment was far more egregious to me. Only 17 Republicans between the House and Senate voted in favor, the rest put party over country.
 
Last edited:


Liz Truss is against Kamala which is about as much of a ringing endorsement as one can get.

She looks 7 and 70 at the same time. Here's an excerpt from the piece:
Truss blamed the Democrats' obsession with “identity politics” for obscuring the selection process in the aftermath of Joe Biden’s departure from the race.

“What I hate is identity politics, We shouldn't care if someone is an ethnic minority. We shouldn't care if they are a woman,” Truss said. “We should be caring about – can they do the job? And she has not proven she can do the job.”

Come Election Day, Truss predicts the result will be “a landslide against the incumbent party because they have not delivered for the American people.”
Oh gee, we shouldn't care if they're a woman or ethnic minority? What about the fact that she's the Vice President?
 
Considering how much of a drug-warrior she has proven to be, Harris is unlikely to convince me. If she wasn't so hawkish on that issue, and her expressed record and personal feelings towards cannabis and other drugs, I would at least give her some consideration.

Kind of surreal to to see the Democratic presumptive nominee to be further right than the Republicans on cannabis and other drugs.
 
I believe there's no way she loses, but it's simply because Trump won't be allowed to win again. They'll make sure she gets 90 million votes, to really rub it in.
 
Swift had a billion dollar tour. This guy gets paid to talk?

Manufactured? Shapiro has obviously never met a Swiftie, a breed of person whose over-the-top enthusiasm for Swift is as genuine—and scary—as it gets. My family is full of the critters.
 
Lmao the extreme cope among magatards that another competent Black lawyer is about to push their obese conman God's diaper shit in again is hilarious
 
Manufactured? Shapiro has obviously never met a Swiftie, a breed of person whose over-the-top enthusiasm for Swift is as genuine—and scary—as it gets. My family is full of the critters.

Shapiro would know all about being manufactured. Here's him manufacturing the notion he's actually pro middle class:

a0N6Zoo7_700w_0.jpg
 
Swift had a billion dollar tour. This guy gets paid to talk?


During his episode today, he went off repeatedly on the sound of Kamala's voice.

I watch Shapiro with regularity, and I don't know if I've ever seen a less self-aware take from him, given how awful his own voice is.

Like, he didn't even have to alter his voice to make fun of her, because they sound the fucking same inherently lol.
 
Back
Top