Nowhere in my post did I say Conor was the first. It doesn't make sense that you would extrapolate that from what I said.Actually he is not the first 2 belt champ in UFC, that title belongs to Couture. The reason why you don't know about it, because UFC didn't allow to officially hold 2 belts at that time, but he was the first...
Not before Conor there wasn’t much of one. It was very, very rare to have a champ vs champ fight. Jose wanted to do it at 155 after cleaning out FW, and Dana told him he’d have to vacate the belt and move up to 155 and start competing there to get a shot. He wasn’t allowed to just directly challenge for the belt.
edit: I should add that there’s no precedent for getting a shot at another title before you’ve defended your own, before Conor came along. I can’t think of an example off hand anyway.
I agree.I’d lean towards Conor I think. But it’s very possible that Zabit could sub him. Obviously never seen them face off, but I’d think Conor would have some size on Zabit. No point in talking about this at FW, as I don’t think Conor can make the weight. At 155 I lean towards Conor. Let’s put Conor around -230, Zabit at +175.
This.At 155lbs, 100% Zhabit wins. (cos McG cannot make 145lbs obviously).
Zhabit wouldn't even need cardio for this. He is a world-class striker, world-class ground-game.
McG is just smoke and mirrors and endless BS and bravado.
So then, Mr Smart-Mouth-Just-Arrived-On-Scene, let's here your reasoned and rational argument why you think that your hero McGregor is going to beat Zabit ? Come on I want some analysis here, some background etc.Thread has been meritorical until that idiot showed up.
who’s that in your avy
So then, Mr Smart-Mouth-Just-Arrived-On-Scene, let's here your reasoned and rational argument why you think that your hero McGregor is going to beat Zabit ? Come on I want some analysis here, some background etc.
McGregor has won 1 MMA fight in 3yrs and 5mths against a man who is very clearly on a career downslope.
McGregor got destroyed by Khabib
McGregor got played with by MayWeather (ok thats boxing, still combat)
What you need to remember is, for example, the pre-fight statements by McGregor where you pronounces how he will do x and y and z and knock everyone out. He IS full of bravado and he DOES make things up. IF you want I can dig some things up to demonstrate this. That will be the "BS and bravado" covered.
But you probably don't want to go down a rational and detailed analysis do you because you can't because you're basically a drive-by One-Line-Insult guy who doesn't have the knowledge or experience about this stuff. Sure there's always gonna be blind fanboy-ism on this site, but try to rise above that, try to think a bit more carefully, and do some detailed explanation of technque, skills, etc. If you actually can.
If you would rather do it over PM on this site, 100% let's go. We can do it there. Or here, whichever you prefer.
honestly, anyone who can keep their right hand up can beat conor. He has one move.So while sitting here procrastinating about doing my assignment this fight popped into my head and I think it would be a fun fight. Who do you think wins and how? at FW and LW. also could a mod add a poll plz?
honestly, anyone who can keep their right hand up can beat conor. He has one move.
Wow thats some deep TMZ stuff. Clearly you dont like McGregor. However my point still stands.
Calling a man who did what he did smoke and mirrors, endless bullshit and bravado is pure idiotism. Especially in the context of Zabit.
By stating that you just showed me that our point of views are too far from each other to ever meet.
Conor never gassed at FW and KO’ed people left and right. Zabit wouldn’t stand a chanceI agree.
- at FW Conor gasses early and gets subbed since Zabit has superior wrestling
- at LW Conor via early KO probably since he is bigger