In your own link : "Positive drug test results take longer to return than negative ones, because the labs double and triple check to confirm the positive before sending it back to an agency. Expediting all results might not be convenient for USADA, which screens more than 500 athletes in year-round random testing as part of the UFC's anti-doping program."
So once again, nothing wrong, just your usual bullshit speculations.
Then they should’ve tested him on June 15, durrr. They would’ve had ample time to get result before UFC 200. They didn’t even attempt to. USADA was negligent with their waiver and testing of Lesnar, period. It’s indisputable. If you’re gonna grant some crazy jacked 280 on dude a waiver to skip 6 months of testing, then you need to prioritize that athlete’s test. Simple.
Bullshit again : UFC or USADA will attempt to coordinate TUE applications with applicable Athletic Commissions. UFC Athletes are on notice, however, that because UFC and USADA do not control Athletic Commission decisions to recognize a UFC TUE or to grant their own TUEs, UFC Athletes should not use any substance or method prohibited by an Athletic Commission unless they are certain that an Athletic Commission TUE is in place. In addition, any Athlete who obtains a TUE from an Athletic Commission or other Anti-Doping Organization, will still need to apply for a UFC TUE. As a condition of USADA’s consideration of TUE applications, Athletes acknowledge and agree that their TUE applications and other information submitted or considered in connection with those applications, including decisions of the USADA TUEC, may be shared with any applicable Athletic Commission.
Nothing I said was bullshit. The UFC is trying to claim Islam’s IV use would’ve been legal, but the Australia commission disagrees.
https://www.mmamania.com/platform/a...e-is-legal-but-australia-commission-disagrees
So did Islam do it, or not? Did USADA know, or not? Good luck finding out.
Indeed how ? Do you know the details of USADA's investigations or you're just spreading your usual vague bullshit statements ?
Thank you for making my point for me.
My whole point is that we would know if it was commission investigating, because it was public. USADA has a major lack of transparency, and it’s a pretty serious issue.
Stop gargling Novitzky’s balls, it’s pathetic.
Lets say Fedor didn't lose in 2000 ( Which he did, regardless of the excuses ) He still did not go undefeated for a decade which his delusional fans always claim.
Fedor debuted May 21, 2000.
10 years from that date is May 21, 2010.
Number of defeats Fedor had on that date: 0.
He wouldn’t lose to Werdum until the following month, which is past the 10 year mark. This is how basic math works.
Really the advantage of it is more out of competition testing but the way its implemented looks to have significantly more room for bias.
I'd trust it much more for lower levels than I would the big names.
Exactly, I totally agree. Year-round testing is much better than what we had before, when a fighter could only be tested by a commission once they were licensed for a particular fight. The problem is exactly what you say: there certainly seems to be bias and wiggle room for the big names, and over time USADA has become more more lax on certain things, more biased towards big names, far less transparent than they used to be.
