This is exactly why I'm mocking you.
You just made two concrete assertions by implication:
- Candace Owns is a member of the "Alt-Right"
This is objectively false. She has never once declared affiliation with or devotion to Richard Spencer's movement
- That, presuming this is true, merely because Rogan invited her on, this would entail that he agrees with her and is attempting to advocate for the cause of the person he is interviewing.
According to this logic, every interviewer who ever interviewed a tyrant, dictator, or other unfavorable character perceived as a knave or a radical by some group is therefore advocating for the interviewee's platform by mere virtue of the fact he is interviewing that person
These are ridiculous, ignorant arguments.
Hm. That's weird.
Almost every entertainer he has on is a leftist, and he talks politics with almost all of them (ex. Hannibal Burress). Also, FYI, if you listened to him, you'd realize that despite his distaste for SJWs, Rogan clearly favored Sanders above all the other candidates in the 2016 election, personally. He had a giant man-crush on the most progressive candidate in the race. He routinely refers to Trump negatively. Here, listen to how he talks about George Soros. Immediately after they talk about Kanye West. Joe and Ben laugh and commiserate about the rise of celebrities in politics. Joe analogizes Trump to Kanye, and laments this effect Trump has had on the political dialogue. He mocks Kanye for not reading and using the wrong "you're" on Twitter-- also both characteristics shared by Trump. Then he rants about Trump stripping the EPA of its power. You know. All super "Alt-Right" stuff. Timestamped.
Rogan definitely has a market, and that market tends to veer a certain way, but they aren't monolithic, and disagree on things like substance abuse and tends to be more male. You don't have to read into guest selection beyond that.