UK police have always struggled to prevent child sexual abuse. Just read about the various scandals about "boys' schools" like Kincora Boys' home, the Rotherham case,or the Jimmy Savile case obviously. It's always been sort of a global safe haven for this type of abuse.
The stats clearly shown that whilst muslim men involved in child sex abuse exist there not overrepresented, its moreso these stories tend to be highlighted more because they feed into racism.
Strange we havent had the same long term focus on something like...
Twenty-one convicted in West Midlands child sex abuse inquiry
Seven children were abused over nearly a decade in Walsall and Wolverhampton, police say.www.bbc.co.uk
You'd think those who claim to really care about child abuse would be just as interested in this as in muslim child abuse gangs but it seems not.
If Muslims are statistically no more likely to carry out sex abuse than white people then has immigration increased the potential for sex abuse? pure numbers perhaps because you have a larger population but not as a percentage.The point here is: The muslim sexual abuse could have been prevented, the others could not.
seems like you're saying more immigration means more child sexual abuse, numbers wise.If Muslims are statistically no more likely to carry out sex abuse than white people then has immigration increased the potential for sex abuse? pure numbers perhaps because you have a larger population but not as a percentage.
So you think the media coverage had been the same if gangs of white men had raped and trafficked thousands of Muslim children?
It would have been front page day in and day out.
UK police have always struggled to prevent child sexual abuse. Just read about the various scandals about "boys' schools" like Kincora Boys' home, the Rotherham case,or the Jimmy Savile case obviously. It's always been sort of a global safe haven for this type of abuse.
what a meaningless reply.Maybe. Maybe other places are even worse at catching people.
what a meaningless reply.
some might agree with what you say and some might not.Well there isn't any proof that it's better or worse anywhere else. There have been cover ups in other countries before so who's to say there aren't more going on now?
some might agree with what you say and some might not.
or might not.They might
When you have a culture known for the mistreatment and rape of women, that come into another country and organize and continue the culture, that isn't a problem? When they target the youth of the country they migrate to? If you have a problem with people stealing, would you allow thousands of people in from somewhere else known for stealing? Why is this a hard concept to understand. In this case it is DANGEROUS to try and be politically correct.If Muslims are statistically no more likely to carry out sex abuse than white people then has immigration increased the potential for sex abuse? pure numbers perhaps because you have a larger population but not as a percentage.
If you have a nation of 50 million people which has say 5,000 sex abuse cases and a nation of 10 million people which has 3,000 sex abuses cases who has the bigger problem?seems like you're saying more immigration means more child sexual abuse, numbers wise.
the nation that lets in rapists.If you have a nation of 50 million people which has say 5,000 sex abuse cases and a nation of 10 million people which has 3,000 sex abuses cases who has the bigger problem?
So what your saying is the nation with a much higher percentage of sex abuse per person has less of a problem than a nation who lets in immigrants who are statistically no more likely than its existing population to commit sex abuse?the nation that lets in rapists.
where do you get the "no more likely" bit?So what your saying is the nation with a much higher percentage of sex abuse per person has less of a problem than a nation who lets in immigrants who are statistically no more likely than its existing population to commit sex abuse?
It was front page.