• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

JBJ is already 31 years old...

I don't want to see Jon at HW. He has to face a lot of big, strong fighters with a lot of power behind their punches. Miocic, Ngannou, Lewis, Blaydes, possibly Lesnar, Tuivasa and etc.

Stay in your lane as the greatest LHW ever.
 
According to you, how many 'elite' years does he realistically still have left to rebuild his legacy,
knowing that he hasnt suffered that much damage (Vitor Gracie / Gus) and that his camp/coaches are pretty 'conservative'?
<DCrying><DCrying><DCrying><DCrying>




<JonesLaugh>
 
there is zero evidence that he only took a trace amount. why do you keep repeating this?
Bruh, the fucking samples he's submitted in a small period of time show that it was a trace amount. It was in and out of his system really quick. If it was a large amount it would show in his system for awhile. Stop being a soyboy and trying to make excuses for Daniel Belt Warmer Cormier.
 
Bruh, the fucking samples he's submitted in a small period of time show that it was a trace amount. It was in and out of his system really quick. If it was a large amount it would show in his system for awhile. Stop being a soyboy and trying to make excuses for Daniel Belt Warmer Cormier.

You are talking bollocks.

His previous test was a month earlier, it did not just suddenly appear.

Second, it was metabolite they analyse for which by their very nature are really really small.

His own fucking defence expert Paul Scott stated in the fucking hearing that there was no possible way of knowing how much was administered!!

His own defence team admitted that!!
 
All I know is a 39 year old DC murks a juiced up 39 year old Jon jones
 
You are talking bollocks.

His previous test was a month earlier, it did not just suddenly appear.

Second, it was metabolite they analyse for which by their very nature are really really small.

His own fucking defence expert Paul Scott stated in the fucking hearing that there was no possible way of knowing how much was administered!!

His own defence team admitted that!!
Bruh he tested negative and within less then a month tested positive then again tested negative not too long after. What he tested positive for can be detected for several months in someone. Which he clearly didn't have it in his system for several months making it a small trace amount that entered into him. Which appears to logically point towards a tainted supplement. Of course there's no way to know the exact amount.but it's obvious it wasn't alot. With the small ass amount that did enter his system sometime within less then a month of the fight it would have no bearing on how the fight went. He didn't become a God from that trace amount. No amount of steroids would've set him up to destroy DC. DC lost because he's nowhere near Jones level plain and simple. This is America and we have due process and until its proven that he intentionally took it he did not cheat. Innocent until proven guilty.
 
All I know is a 39 year old DC murks a juiced up 39 year old Jon jones
LOL Idk what liberal fantasy world you live in. But DC will never beat Jon Jones. Daniel Belt Warmer Cormier is only talked about as someone who holds on to Jones belt while he's on break.
 
If you ignore the official decision and go by who was doing more damage and consider the Hamill fight a win, then you have to do the same thing and consider the Gus fight a loss. Either way, he’s lost.

People need to stop being delusional. He didn't lose versus Gus, nobody has ever gotten that close to beating Jones before so people want to give him the fight. Gus didn't do enough in rounds 4 and 5, that's all there is to it.
 
Bruh he tested negative and within less then a month tested positive then again tested negative not too long after.

not long after? you call three months not long after

What he tested positive for can be detected for several months in someone. Which he clearly didn't have it in his system for several months making it a small trace amount that entered into him.

The detection window of metabolite M3 is around 30-60 days. (Per Daniel Eichner SMRTL and Don Catlin UCLA)

He was tested at the start of July (7th) that was negative

His sample from July 28th was positive

His next urine sample was Mid October, nearly three months later.

If the detection window is only around 60 days then of course, 80 days later his sample will be clean.

duh.

Which appears to logically point towards a tainted supplement.

Despite there NEVER, EVER being an incident of a non-high-risk supplement being found contaminated with turinabol.

In the tens of hundreds of supplements USADA have tested, not one single supplement found contaminated with turinabol where there wasnt indication on the packaging that it contained prohibited substances. NO ONE.

In tens of hundreds of supplements tested by the FDA, not one single supplement found contaminated with turinabol where there wasnt indication on the packaging that it created prohibited substances.

So your logic is, that Jones, was able to be the first person ever to find a supplement to be contaminated with turinabol?

How is that logical? That Jones situation is so unique, such an outlier to what we know from past testing, to be more likely?

And thats before we get into the fact that Jones team sent 17 supplements for analysis. SEVENTEEN. Thats seven that he declared on his anti doping forms and an additional ten on top. And NONE of them were found to contain turinabol.

So not only would Jones have to have found the first ever non-risk supplement to contain tbol, but also, despite a years investigation, neither he, nor his team were able to remember the name of that supplement, remember him taking it, it wasnt reported on any of his doping controls forms...

You think that is Logical?

Of course there's no way to know the exact amount.but it's obvious it wasn't alot.

You simply have no way of determining this. His own fucking expert (Paul Scott of Scott Analytics/Korva Labs) even stated there was no way of knowing how much was administered. He clearly stated that it simply wasnt possible to know that.

Are you claiming that you know more than his own fucking expert witness?


Innocent until proven guilty.

Unfortunately that is now how doping violations work. USADA have proven that the substance was in his system, that is indisputable. Jones does not dispute that.

The onus is then on Jones' team to determine how it got in his system.

Innocent till proven guilty is totally unworkable in doping cases. How can USADa prove that he deliberately took a steroid, unless you have video evidence of him taking it its impossible. Thats why the onus is on the athlete to demonstrate how it got there.
 
not long after? you call three months not long after



The detection window of metabolite M3 is around 30-60 days. (Per Daniel Eichner SMRTL and Don Catlin UCLA)

He was tested at the start of July (7th) that was negative

His sample from July 28th was positive

His next urine sample was Mid October, nearly three months later.

If the detection window is only around 60 days then of course, 80 days later his sample will be clean.

duh.



Despite there NEVER, EVER being an incident of a non-high-risk supplement being found contaminated with turinabol.

In the tens of hundreds of supplements USADA have tested, not one single supplement found contaminated with turinabol where there wasnt indication on the packaging that it contained prohibited substances. NO ONE.

In tens of hundreds of supplements tested by the FDA, not one single supplement found contaminated with turinabol where there wasnt indication on the packaging that it created prohibited substances.

So your logic is, that Jones, was able to be the first person ever to find a supplement to be contaminated with turinabol?

How is that logical? That Jones situation is so unique, such an outlier to what we know from past testing, to be more likely?

And thats before we get into the fact that Jones team sent 17 supplements for analysis. SEVENTEEN. Thats seven that he declared on his anti doping forms and an additional ten on top. And NONE of them were found to contain turinabol.

So not only would Jones have to have found the first ever non-risk supplement to contain tbol, but also, despite a years investigation, neither he, nor his team were able to remember the name of that supplement, remember him taking it, it wasnt reported on any of his doping controls forms...

You think that is Logical?



You simply have no way of determining this. His own fucking expert (Paul Scott of Scott Analytics/Korva Labs) even stated there was no way of knowing how much was administered. He clearly stated that it simply wasnt possible to know that.

Are you claiming that you know more than his own fucking expert witness?




Unfortunately that is now how doping violations work. USADA have proven that the substance was in his system, that is indisputable. Jones does not dispute that.

The onus is then on Jones' team to determine how it got in his system.

Innocent till proven guilty is totally unworkable in doping cases. How can USADa prove that he deliberately took a steroid, unless you have video evidence of him taking it its impossible. Thats why the onus is on the athlete to demonstrate how it got there.


First of all it ISN'T proven yet that it was steroids.
Even the GENIUS JOE ROGAN believes in JBJ (the greatest of our generation btw) is innocent.
We all know it was tainted supplements or some really strong dick pills.
When you get mad pussy like JBJ you need a little helping hand like that.
But you wouldn't know you're stuck with rosy palm and her five sisters.
Dirty ass commie spotted.
I live in the greatest country on earth, THE GREAT OL USA.
Here we have DUE PROCESS.
I HIGHLY IMPLORE YOU RESEARCH IT.
IN FACT LET ME HELP YOU. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+is+due+process?
 
not long after? you call three months not long after


The detection window of metabolite M3 is around 30-60 days. (Per Daniel Eichner SMRTL and Don Catlin UCLA)

He was tested at the start of July (7th) that was negative

His sample from July 28th was positive

His next urine sample was Mid October, nearly three months later.

If the detection window is only around 60 days then of course, 80 days later his sample will be clean.

duh.



Despite there NEVER, EVER being an incident of a non-high-risk supplement being found contaminated with turinabol.

In the tens of hundreds of supplements USADA have tested, not one single supplement found contaminated with turinabol where there wasnt indication on the packaging that it contained prohibited substances. NO ONE.

In tens of hundreds of supplements tested by the FDA, not one single supplement found contaminated with turinabol where there wasnt indication on the packaging that it created prohibited substances.

So your logic is, that Jones, was able to be the first person ever to find a supplement to be contaminated with turinabol?

How is that logical? That Jones situation is so unique, such an outlier to what we know from past testing, to be more likely?

And thats before we get into the fact that Jones team sent 17 supplements for analysis. SEVENTEEN. Thats seven that he declared on his anti doping forms and an additional ten on top. And NONE of them were found to contain turinabol.

So not only would Jones have to have found the first ever non-risk supplement to contain tbol, but also, despite a years investigation, neither he, nor his team were able to remember the name of that supplement, remember him taking it, it wasnt reported on any of his doping controls forms...

You think that is Logical?



You simply have no way of determining this. His own fucking expert (Paul Scott of Scott Analytics/Korva Labs) even stated there was no way of knowing how much was administered. He clearly stated that it simply wasnt possible to know that.

Are you claiming that you know more than his own fucking expert witness?




Unfortunately that is now how doping violations work. USADA have proven that the substance was in his system, that is indisputable. Jones does not dispute that.

The onus is then on Jones' team to determine how it got in his system.

Innocent till proven guilty is totally unworkable in doping cases. How can USADa prove that he deliberately took a steroid, unless you have video evidence of him taking it its impossible. Thats why the onus is on the athlete to demonstrate how it got there.
Yo buddy calm yourself theres no need to get all heated about the facts.
Fact 1: Jones is the GOAT
Fact 2: Jones never cheated
Fact 3: DC got his ass whooped
Fact 4: Jones coming back to whoop more ass
Fact 5: Postive because of tainted supplements
Fact 6: Tainted supplement had no effect on Jon's performance
Fact 7: DC warms Jon's belt for him
Fact 8: Jones will be Lhw and hw champ end of 2019
Fact 9: Nobody beats Jones
Fact 10: Jones will forever be the GOAT
 
Back
Top