• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Jan 6th Committee Hearings Megathread; Links in OP

Did Election Fraud Cost Trump The Election?


  • Total voters
    303
Because they suffered over a hundred injuries when trying to stop the mob from getting their way outside, so after the police fell back inside they focused on protecting politician's lives and containing the damage instead of detaining the angry mob's most famous member and possibly instigating more of a reaction.
Yea sure show me where they said that
 
Tucker didn't bother to interview the capitol police before making his claims because he's admitted he's not a journalist he's just trying to rile you up for ratings, successfully.
Except Tucker explicitly stated before playing the first footage that the capital police worked with his producers on all the footage and approved everything.
Stop lying.
 
Except Tucker explicitly stated before playing the first footage that the capital police worked with his producers on all the footage and approved everything.
Stop lying.

Then post the segment where he interviews the capitol police there about their motivations for these actions instead of just broadcasting his huge assumptions.

Maybe these interviews got lost with that evidence Tucker said was in the mail.
 
Except Tucker explicitly stated before playing the first footage that the capital police worked with his producers on all the footage and approved everything.
Stop lying.
His producers approve all the stupid shit he says. So thats not much of an argument. His lawyers say he is full of shit. I think ill take their word for it.
 
reading comprehension fail. I said the capitol police approved all the footage before he played it on air. Try to keep up.

What the fuck do you mean they "approved the footage?" The Capital Police are in no position to bar Tucker playing footage that he got handed to from a Senator.

But if you want to know what the Capital Police actually thought about Tucker's segment, you can find that article here:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/07/politics/capitol-police-tucker-carlson-january-6-footage/index.html

Surprise, they all think Tucker is a lying dumbfuck. So let's here some comments that the Chief of Police had about Tucker's segment:
-“Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,”
-Carlson’s show didn’t reach out to the police department “to provide accurate context.”
-“The program conveniently cherry-picked from the calmer moments of our 41,000 hours of video. The commentary fails to provide context about the chaos and violence that happened before or during these less tense moments,”


Boy, look at all that praise they are heaping on your boy.

What amazes me most about this story though, is that you and Tucker think your really poorly thought out lies were gonna work here. I mean, there was probably the understanding that the only people gullibble enough to believe the segment, were the very same people that Tucker admitted to lying to in a sworn statement. That doesn't give you pause? That Tucker, under oath in a deposition, admitted to lying to his viewers about Jan. 6th, and did so because he was afraid that if Fox didn't push the lie that Donny won the election, they'd loose viewers to Newmax. But you're gonna come in here an suggest that not only is Tucker honest, but the capital police back his version of events? Christ.

I'll tell you what kid, no one picked a more accurate user name than you did.
 
What the fuck do you mean they "approved the footage?" The Capital Police are in no position to bar Tucker playing footage that he got handed to from a Senator.

But if you want to know what the Capital Police actually thought about Tucker's segment, you can find that article here:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/07/politics/capitol-police-tucker-carlson-january-6-footage/index.html

Surprise, they all think Tucker is a lying dumbfuck. So let's here some comments that the Chief of Police had about Tucker's segment:
-“Last night an opinion program aired commentary that was filled with offensive and misleading conclusions about the January 6 attack,”
-Carlson’s show didn’t reach out to the police department “to provide accurate context.”
-“The program conveniently cherry-picked from the calmer moments of our 41,000 hours of video. The commentary fails to provide context about the chaos and violence that happened before or during these less tense moments,”


Boy, look at all that praise they are heaping on your boy.

What amazes me most about this story though, is that you and Tucker think your really poorly thought out lies were gonna work here. I mean, there was probably the understanding that the only people gullibble enough to believe the segment, were the very same people that Tucker admitted to lying to in a sworn statement. That doesn't give you pause? That Tucker, under oath in a deposition, admitted to lying to his viewers about Jan. 6th, and did so because he was afraid that if Fox didn't push the lie that Donny won the election, they'd loose viewers to Newmax. But you're gonna come in here an suggest that not only is Tucker honest, but the capital police back his version of events? Christ.

I'll tell you what kid, no one picked a more accurate user name than you did.

Imagine appealing to the authority of the Capitol Police Chief. The very guy who lied about his officer's death, the guy who spent the last 2 years lying about what happened in the capitol. Tucker's producer absolutely worked with capitol police on the footage. I guess the officer forgot to get the "official opinion" from the chief. Let's see if he keeps talking about "cherry picking" when Tucker, night after night, releases new footage.

As far as names go, kid you should be ashamed to have a name that has anything to do with having balls.
 
Last edited:
Imagine appealing to the authority of the Capitol Police Chief. The very guy who lied about his officer's death, the guy who spent the last 2 years lying about what happened in the capitol. Tucker's producer absolutely worked with capitol police on the footage. I guess the officer forgot to get the "official opinion" from the chief. Let's see if he keeps talking about "cherry picking" when Tucker, night after night, releases new footage.

As far as names go, kid you should be ashamed to have a name that has anything to do with having balls.


You are appealing to the authority of a cable show host who doesn’t even call his own content news.
 
Imagine appealing to the authority of the Capitol Police Chief. The very guy who lied about his officer's death, the guy who spent the last 2 years lying about what happened in the capitol. Tucker's producer absolutely worked with capitol police on the footage. I guess the officer forgot to get the "official opinion" from the chief. Let's see if he keeps talking about "cherry picking" when Tucker, night after night, releases new footage.

As far as names go, kid you should be ashamed to have a name that has anything to do with having balls.

You are backing a guy who just admitted, under oath, that he lied to his viewers about this very subject.

But yeah, the Chief of Police is really the dishonest party here.

Mate, I really hope you are a parody account. Because otherwise, I've never met someone so unaware that they were the mark.
 
Trump bootlickers now using the “mostly peaceful” term is the icing on the cake here after hearing them about BLM. (Before you cunts say it, I think all protesters that perform violence should be arrested)

Even if there was 40000 hours of “peaceful” protests you are a dumb fuck to say that hundreds of people didn’t go to the capital to stop the rightful election and overthrow the government. They said that was the goal and there is video of the attack.

Unbelievable this is even being discussed but we are talking about MAGA shitbags that live on a different plain of existence.
 
That’s what I want to know, did someone up in DC, tell they mayor/ chief of police to let these people in the building so they knew it could become a bigger issue and a huge talking point in elections? Pretty shameful it so.


If the chief of police had previously decided to let these people in then these people would not have needed to scale the building and utilize mob violence and weapons against the police to get in, Sherlock.

If someone is planning on letting you in somewhere you don’t need to mace them, beat them with a pipe, and climb the side of their building first to make it happen.
 
Trump bootlickers now using the “mostly peaceful” term is the icing on the cake here after hearing them about BLM. (Before you cunts say it, I think all protesters that perform violence should be arrested)

Even if there was 40000 hours of “peaceful” protests you are a dumb fuck to say that hundreds of people didn’t go to the capital to stop the rightful election and overthrow the government. They said that was the goal and there is video of the attack.

Unbelievable this is even being discussed but we are talking about MAGA shitbags that live on a different plain of existence.

If you're government can be overthrown by a bunch of fat, retarded cosplayers, it doesn't deserve to survive:rolleyes:
 
lol, imagine still tuning into this shit.
FqquPDlXwAI4ywZ
 
Back
Top