James Toney v Marvin Hagler

treelo

Fuck off
@Silver
Joined
Dec 19, 2001
Messages
10,433
Reaction score
5,458
Got thinking about this today, and while i think Toney is the better technical boxer, i just think he lacked output at times, and coupled with Haglers resilience, i feel 8/10 Hagler would have won the fight on points

I think on the odd accasion we could have seen Hagler stopped on cuts, but i think it would have been few and far between.

Love both these fighters, they both have amazing qualities as fighter, i dont think if Hagler had of had the same cut he did against Hearns, that he would have been able to stop Toney, other than the Jones mistake, i dont remember him ever going down or being hurt in the slightest

Would have been a match-up for the time, imagine Toney was just a decade younger, he would have been in there with the fantastic 4
 
Toney lost to Drake Thadzi and Montell Griffin twice. He thought of himself as some defensive genius but he's too inactive and could be outworked.
 
Hagler is the heavy favorite.

Toney was extremely talented but his laziness has also always been part of personality.
his feet were always lacking

Hagler is a South paw workhorse who is a marvelous boxer in his own right. not too mention he had plenty of power and was tough as a rock.

if it's 15 rounds I think Hagler brings the war to every front and Toney crumbles
 
Hagler is the heavy favorite.

Toney was extremely talented but his laziness has also always been part of personality.
his feet were always lacking

Hagler is a South paw workhorse who is a marvelous boxer in his own right. not too mention he had plenty of power and was tough as a rock.

if it's 15 rounds I think Hagler brings the war to every front and Toney crumbles

What you did there, I see it. This is very good, very good.
 
Toney was inconsistent but his peaks were phenomenal. Toney at his worst would lose to Hagler but Toney at his best would beat him, easily.

Hagler lost to a WW, Toney beat the HW champion. The version of Toney that destroyed Iran Barkley would never, ever lose to a WW.
 
Toney was inconsistent but his peaks were phenomenal. Toney at his worst would lose to Hagler but Toney at his best would beat him, easily.

Hagler lost to a WW, Toney beat the HW champion. The version of Toney that destroyed Iran Barkley would never, ever lose to a WW.
this is somewhat is a spin on things

Leonard wasnt a welterweight when he beat Hagler
Toney hasnt ever beaten THE heavyweight champion, infact, he hasnt ever beaten a then current champion
 
You could always count on Hagler to come in in tip top shape. Toney might come in with man boobs and a gut. While even then he could still beat most fighters Hagler wasn’t most fighters. Hagler via easy decision as Toney had one of the best chins of all-time.
 
Toney was inconsistent but his peaks were phenomenal. Toney at his worst would lose to Hagler but Toney at his best would beat him, easily.

Hagler lost to a WW, Toney beat the HW champion. The version of Toney that destroyed Iran Barkley would never, ever lose to a WW.

Toney beat John Ruiz while on steroids…

Quite the spin you’ve put on things here.
 
Toney would beat hagler.

Hagler struggled against the in-fighting of old-fart Duran, Toney would tear him up.
 
i wonder how many people never actually saw Toney's early fights against McCallum and his fights at MW, it doesnt seem like a lot if you think Toney was always just a fat bloke
 
Marvin just based on his discipline and his versatility. Both had all time chins so no knockout. Depending on which james shows up could be a real difficult one.
 
i've never seen Toney with a single hair on his head ever, not sure what you are referencing here

I can’t find it but some fight on ESPN in the late 90s he showed up fat and out of shape and had dreadlocks. Here’s a pick proving he’s not bald though and with more than a single hair on his head:

1754504767132.jpeg
 
Back
Top