- Joined
- Mar 8, 2013
- Messages
- 3,338
- Reaction score
- 2
this was legal
Actually the cage favours strikers as they quite often use the cage ala chuck Liddell style to get back to their feet.
Not so much in pride
Miss pride becoming big fan of oneFC
God I hate when people say UFC's rules. They are not their rule set. They follow the same rules as every other promotion in North America, the unified rules of MMA.
Same thing when they talk about refs and judges. Fucking irritating.
Miss pride becoming big fan of oneFC
A grounded opponent is any fighter who has more than just the soles of their feet on the ground. (i.e. could have one shin or one finger down to be considered a downed fighter) If the referee determines that a fighter would be a grounded fighter but is not solely because the ring ropes or cage fence has held fighter from the ground, the referee can instruct the combatants that he is treating the fighter held up solely by the cage or ropes as a grounded fighter
Ive actually started to become a big fan of one fc too.... still miss pride tho.
I was really looking forward to watching the total domination show but now ill be away with work and unable to watch, which sucks.
Hoping cody stevens and peter davis can get the wins go hard mates!!
The rules strongly favor wrestlers in the UFC. It's hard to punish repeated TD attempts with knees (like JDS/Cain II) or to fight off your back with upkicks, because most wrestlers are smart enough to keep a knee or a hand on the ground to stop them.
Shows a bunch of legal examples and an illegal upkick per the rules in the UFC.