Two man enter, one man leave.
Full scorched earth.
This is a good example of how caustically he speaks but when you look into a lot of what he's saying it's accurate.
We do need to put pressure on politicians that are supposed to represent us, they're supposed to stay with the people who brought them to the dance and that means criticizing and getting them out sometimes. Bernie could have gotten concessions out of Corn Pop in return for his support and progressives can be putting more pressure on from within, but he didn't. That was a HUGE, costly error, worthy of criticism. Jimmy is also correct about some of Bernie's campaign staff.
A good example of pressure and criticism working was Ro Khanna endorsing AOC. He endorsed her opponent first, a political move of hedging his bet because he'd passed legislation with him and might have to work with him again, but then he dual endorsed AOC as well because people were outraged went in hard on him. Criticism and pressure is essential and while there's arguments to be made that focusing the brunt of one's criticism toward the liberal side of the isle is more harmful than productive (and in some cases may carry a nefarious agenda), this can go too far the other direction where people are shamed for justified complaints about those who are supposed to represent them. Party failings will never been addressed without constructive criticism and pressure.
Calling everyone cowards who says we need to work within the framework of the two party system as Jimmy Pop did here is quite strong, but the argument that direct action is required and that large scale changes won't be achieved in electoral politics is a legitimate point of debate.
In any event, I tend to side with
@Jackie Blue, of the left/progressive political commentators, Kyle Kulskinski is one of the most measured and grounded. Nomiki Konst and several others are excellent too.