Crime Is Flynn Cohen to Prison? (SCO Thread v. 26)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bloody Pulp said:
Roberts pulled papers while people where hanging around and they had never see that before.
Click to expand...
They never seen a time where the Supreme court justice intervened like this during an FBI investigation.
 
PEB said:
They never seen a time where the Supreme court justice intervened like this during an FBI investigation.
Click to expand...

Intervened like what in what? Answer that In your OP and it’ll help.

He did a thing while people where around doesn’t really explain wtf you’re talking about to anyone who hasn’t watched your video
 
Interesting interview with a guy that worked for both Guilliani and Clinton.

Anchor:
What country has links to Corporation A?"

Cunningham:
It could be a bank from Russia, or any other county.
It could be an energy company from Russia, or any other country......or Saudi"

Anchor:
What was it like to worked for Gulliani?

Cunningham:
I was proud, but now he is a joke.


My .02:
Why didn't the anchor also ask what it was like to work for Clinton?


I wanted so bad to get some insight into Robert's intervention. It sounded good. But, I still left disappointed.

This interview had so much potential.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
The bitching by Trump fans is gonna be epic. It's also quite telling, all of this deep state talk, when the SCOTUS chief justice blocks the authority to subpoena a foreign entity connected in some way to the president. crickets......crickets....
Click to expand...



Quoted for future embarrassment.


You don’t hear anything from republicans, or the average voter/citizen, because nobody but you far left goofs actually give a shit about Muh Russia.



You guys just love being let down. Is that why you’re all so fond of Obama?
 
PEB said:
Not much to talk about former prosecutor talked about that fact that Roberts pulled papers while someone was hanging around saw papers were pulled. They said they have never seen such an action to potentially protect a specific corporation.
Click to expand...
Well this clears it up, Mr. Vauge.. But I will admit as long as you are posting in the WR and not in the YLYL threads, I am good.
 
Video is presumably about the temporary stay Roberts put in place over the holidays.

Context: SCO is currently engaged in "sealed" (not public) litigation with respect to a company owned by a foreign country. The company would like to ignore a subpoena. The litigation is about whether they can lawfully do so, given their owner. Every judge to hear the case has said that they cannot and the subpoena can proceed. They appealed to scotus. Roberts has indicated that scotus might consider that issue and temporarily stayed the subpoena (stopped it from proceeding).

This is unusual, although not in any earthshaking way. The supreme court has never had a fully sealed case before, though, and Roberts keeping to the seal even for this limited order is unusual.
 
Last edited:
Fluffernutter said:
Interesting interview with a guy that worked for both Guilliani and Clinton.

Anchor:
What country has links to Corporation A?"

Cunningham:
It could be a bank from Russia, or any other county.
It could be an energy company from Russia, or any other country......or Saudi"

Anchor:
What was it like to worked for Gulliani?

Cunningham:
I was proud, but now he is a joke.


My .02:
Why didn't the anchor also ask what it was like to work for Clinton?


I wanted so bad to get some insight into Robert's intervention. It sounded good. But, I still left disappointed.

This interview had so much potential.
Click to expand...


I would guess that it's because Giuliani is the president's lawyer, and Clinton is irrelevant
 
Fluffernutter said:
Interesting interview with a guy that worked for both Guilliani and Clinton.

Anchor:
What country has links to Corporation A?"

Cunningham:
It could be a bank from Russia, or any other county.
It could be an energy company from Russia, or any other country......or Saudi"

Anchor:
What was it like to worked for Gulliani?

Cunningham:
I was proud, but now he is a joke.


My .02:
Why didn't the anchor also ask what it was like to work for Clinton?


I wanted so bad to get some insight into Robert's intervention. It sounded good. But, I still left disappointed.

This interview had so much potential.
Click to expand...
You're running a major cable TV show with limited time.
Do you...
A) Ask about the person who is currently working for the president involved in an investigation as legal counsel
B) Ask about working for a former president in no way involved in the investigation

lol I can only fathom what sort of crazy lense you must apply to the world to have your mind on Clinton such that you thought it was the missing component of that interview.
 
Quipling said:
Video is presumably about the temporary stay Roberts put in place over the holidays.

Context: SCO is currently engaged in "sealed" (not public) litigation with respect to a company owned by a foreign country. The company would like to ignore a subpoena. The litigation is about whether they can lawfully do so, given their owner. Every judge to hear the case has said that they cannot and the subpoena can proceed. They appealed to scotus. Roberts has indicated that scotus might consider that issue and temporarily stayed the subpoena (stopped it from proceeding).

This is unusual, although not in any earthshaking way. The supreme court has never had a fully sealed case before, though, and Roberts keeping to the seal even for this limited order is unusual.


Let's not pretend like you care about the contents except to make your scripted orangeman/npc remark.
Click to expand...


Uh? That wasn’t me friend.
 
Quipling said:
Whoops. Meant @ShadowRun . Will edit accordingly.
Click to expand...
Reading that post I see. You and I have had some good discussions in the past.That is weird and can be troubled-some. Going to keep my eye on how it plays out and I usually match TS what what I think they give. He always post some of the never Trump.index type of things, that are over the top. I am happy to say Trump has no business being president but he isn't a Nazi, racist, Russian agent either.

If the investigation proves he worked with Russia for the elections in exchange for favors or things of that nature I'm fine watching him get impeached and charged. But the Trump hysteria is on a NPC level, also that is one of my fav memes for some reason lol.
 
brackis1 said:
You're running a major cable TV show with limited time.
Do you...
A) Ask about the person who is currently working for the president involved in an investigation as legal counsel
B) Ask about working for a former president in no way involved in the investigation

lol I can only fathom what sort of crazy lense you must apply to the world to have your mind on Clinton such that you thought it was the missing component of that interview.
Click to expand...

C) Continue asking Cunningham questions regarding his story he wrote in Politico. It is indeed an interesting story.

However, in the introduction of the interview, the anchor stated that Cunningham used to work for both Gulliani and the Clintons. I assume she did that to show that Cunningham is both a major wonk and is not a partisan hack.

But, by sidetracking the conversation at the end to, it gave more fuel to the charge that the media is biased against Trump tire.

As for me, I'm not crazy. I just think it would have been best to either not bring up the Guilianni question OR bring up both high-powered clients that was brought up during the introduction of the interview.
 
bobgeese said:
Quoted for future embarrassment.


You don’t hear anything from republicans, or the average voter/citizen, because nobody but you far left goofs actually give a shit about Muh Russia.



You guys just love being let down. Is that why you’re all so fond of Obama?
Click to expand...

Whether your unlettered ass cares about it, it is a legal investigation, sanctioned legally by a Trump appointee. The investigation has yielded numerous pleas and convictions of administration officials at the highest levels. Why you don't care about addressing a hostile foreign entity being able to suborn the breaching of our democratic election system, choosing to obfuscate and display apathy is beyond me.

But then again, I value our system of government above the leaders I am fans of, and value a legitimate investigation into corruption over a foreign corporation being investigated. But that's me, an American.
 
But this is Trump's Justice Department! How could they do this to him, the disloyal jerks!
 
brackis1 said:
I can only fathom what sort of crazy lense you must apply to the world to have your mind on Clinton such that you thought it was the missing component of that interview.
Click to expand...

I wanted to respond to this part separately.

I believe that Hillary Clinton would have made a fine president. She is a centrist. I think she makes her decisions in a measured way with reason. I also believe that we would not have this crazy "Presidenting by tweets" that we have now if she had won.

I've seen Hillary with both the cameras are on and when they are off. I was impressed with her each time.

I've met a few of her advisers and I found them to be smart and competent people.

Now that I got that out of the way...

Interviews like the ones that were hyperlinked within this thread that I commented about are playing right into Trump's hands (inB4 someone mentions how tiny they are) about how biased the network news is against him.

As I stated above. This "Chief Justice Roberts intervened in the Mueller investigation" is an intriguing story. Therefore, I had hoped that it would have been the only part of the story that was mentioned within the interview.

The question about Guilliani was inserted at the end just to let Cunningham give a parting shot before they cut to sell some SUVs (or prescription drugs) on the commercial break.
 
MC OverPressure said:
But this is Trump's Justice Department! How could they do this to him, the disloyal jerks!
Click to expand...
Yea if Trump only had a Eric Holder by his side you know a "wingman" and being "boys" with the prez.. he would be safe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,164
Messages
57,971,880
Members
175,887
Latest member
kaneoconnor98

Share this page

Back
Top