• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Crime Is Flynn Cohen to Prison? (SCO Thread v. 26)

Status
Not open for further replies.
He led the Clinton investigation or did you forget that part?

He made people not lie in an investigation? Wow. That's impressive. If only we had more people like that in law enforcement.
 
He made people not lie in an investigation? Wow. That's impressive. If only we had more people like that in law enforcement.
Why do you even post? it's a waste of data packets
 
A lot of tweets and lying to fbi during interviews I still don’t see anything with Russian collusion and the election. But maybe v65 we will get there.... it’s like Clinton’s emails, Benz. Obama birth certificate a lot of fishing in a small fish lake being done. Next unpaid speeding tickets
Yeah I remember when Clinton's lawyer, campaign manager, and National security advisor all plead guilty....oh wait.
 
A lot of tweets and lying to fbi during interviews I still don’t see anything with Russian collusion and the election. But maybe v65 we will get there.... it’s like Clinton’s emails, Benz. Obama birth certificate a lot of fishing in a small fish lake being done. Next unpaid speeding tickets
You can't be serious.
Everybody but the boss is dirty?
Really?
And do you really expect Mueller to show his hand early? The investigation has turned up a mountain of crimes!
 
DEM%2BHILLARY%25282%2529.png
WHAT! ABOUT!
 
So again, which part of this unrelated article has anything to do with what I was talking about?

I didnt say anything about 19,000 texts or Donald trump.

I said their two SCO phones were deleted before the OIG was able to see them. One of them (page’s) wasn’t even examined by the SCO before being deleted.

Try again.

The part where the DOJ has no policy requiring phone data to be saved and what happened was that procedures were properly followed... the exact opposite of your implication of nefarious actions.

I know you're illiterate at the best of times, but come on.
 
The part where the DOJ has no policy requiring phone data to be saved and what happened was that procedures were properly followed... the exact opposite of your implication of nefarious actions.

I know you're illiterate at the best of times, but come on.

So, which part of this new angle after getting your previous one destroyed has to do with what I said?

Those two phones were in the hands of two people they knew to be using cell phones to communictate things that got them fired and under investigation by the OIG. Might want to, I don’t know, not delete those two phones until the agency investigating them has a look at them.

My department has a policy for destroying evidence to. It generally involves not doing it while the investigations using those bits of evidence are ongoing.
 
So, which part of this new angle after getting your previous one destroyed has to do with what I said?

Those two phones were in the hands of two people they knew to be using cell phones to communictate things that got them fired and under investigation by the OIG. Might want to, I don’t know, not delete those two phones until the agency investigating them has a look at them.

My department has a policy for destroying evidence to. It generally involves not doing it while the investigations using those bits of evidence are ongoing.

Do you understand how policies work? The contents were reviewed and deleted, as per policy. Deviating from procedure would open them to more criticism. If your "oopsy doopsy" comment meant that something underhanded happened then you've got your head far up your ass.
 
Do you understand how policies work? The contents were reviewed and deleted, as per policy. Deviating from procedure would open them to more criticism. If your "oopsy doopsy" comment meant that something underhanded happened then you've got your head far up your ass.

One was reviewed, one was not - by the same office they worked for. Both were deleted before the agency investigating them, OIG, looked at them.

Deviating from “we delete them all” would probably be the best course when those two phones in particular are possible evidence.

And A+ for effort bringing personal insults back in to support you’re new stance.
 
One was reviewed, one was not - by the same office they worked for. Both were deleted before the agency investigating them, OIG, looked at them.

Deviating from “we delete them all” would probably be the best course when those two phones in particular are possible evidence.

And A+ for effort bringing personal insults back in to support you’re new stance.
*Yohr
 
HillaryCard.png


My Christmas present to all of my fellow Sherdoggers who actually believe that President Trump "Dent Dew-Nertin". :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top