Im not repeating the 'private company' argument. Reread the thread
Does this "private company" take tax payer money?
Im not repeating the 'private company' argument. Reread the thread
I've seen a clip of it. It is my own conspiracy theory that Alex Jones got himself banned on purpose because he needs his dickcheese fans to donate money to him for his court case.
Exactly, my man. Free speech is the mechanism by which a free society functions, and bad ideas are only exposed by better ones. Silencing Jones made him a martyr and the Streisand Effect is in full effect now.I'm fine with Starbucks throwing out people who are taking up space and not buying anything. Their product is food/drinks in a comfortable environment. Their space is very limited and they need people to buy drinks/food to turn a profit. Also, Starbucks is not primarily a communications platform. In sum, the incident you mentioned wouldn't dissuade me from patronizing Starbucks. (Starbucks's inane response to the incident might, but that's a separate issue.)
A policy of censoring people on a social media platform like Facebook would tend to dissuade me from using the platform. Its product is a platform for connecting with people and sharing ideas. I'd rather be part of a platform in which bad ideas can be attacked and debunked (e.g., the Sherdog War Room) than a platform in which people with bad ideas/misinformation are banned.
Here in the War Room, there are a couple of posters whose writings I find inane and ignorant. I typically ignore them, and I never "report" them or otherwise hope they will be banned.
Interesting video on Jared Holt being a big player behind Alex Jones getting disappeared.
If he wanted to get himself banned, he could have just broke the rules, but he did not. Now, the Proud Boys got Twitter banned and they did nothing either, likely a response from Twitter because the blood thirsty troll mob was out for Alex Jones' blood.I've seen a clip of it. It is my own conspiracy theory that Alex Jones got himself banned on purpose because he needs his dickcheese fans to donate money to him for his court case.
Starbucks is not a monopoly. If you want coffee, you can go to McDonalds. There is simply no other option to Facebook or YouTube, therefor they are monopolies and the internet is in dire need of a Bill Of Rights. If there was another video streaming service that had the butt loads of bandwidth that they let us burn on the tax payers dime, then it would not be a problem, and it's being disingenuous to not acknowledge this as anything other than election meddling directly before the election.Lmao... Funny to see the same exact arguments used on both sides of the pond.
You guys remember the Starbucks controversy? Yeah, that was just a private company exerting it's "right" to let in and throw out whoever it wants for any reason.
But no... YouTube and Facebook are a big librul cunspriracy and shouldn't be doing that.
Hypocrites.
Hundreds of millions tax payer money at that.Does this "private company" take tax payer money?
I don't think I've ever seen a time where Americans n are so fine with the first amendment being suspended for political means. I hate using the 'literally a Nazi' analogy, but this is the closest that I've witnessed in my life. If you want an idea to blow up, the best way is to silence it, which just shows you how clueless the Technocracy has become.Clown shoes.
It could be interpreted either way which obviously was his intent.Alright, then you know he didn't make a death threat to Mueller assuming you really did watch it.
I've been seeing this reasoning a few times now, and I gotta say, I'll believe it when I see it. The right and #classicalliberals have won a lot since November 2016, and thus they don't really recognize losing. Like, if something looks bad, it's only temporary until the real thing happens. But they've had their surge. This might just be the wave breaking on the shore. Everyone knows who Alex Jones is, and have pretty much made up their mind about him. I don't really expect this to sway a whole lot of people who weren't already swayed.
Starbucks is not a monopoly. If you want coffee, you can go to McDonalds. There is simply no other option to Facebook or YouTube, therefor they are monopolies and the internet is in dire need of a Bill Of Rights. If there was another video streaming service that had the butt loads of bandwidth that they let us burn on their dime, then it would not be a problem, and it's being disingenuous to not acknowledge this as anything other than election meddling before the election.
No one sees that shit.I dislike Alex Jones but it's funny when Facebook allowed propaganda for the Islamic State for years to remain.
No. Facebook and Google are indeed monopolies . They together have 90% of all online ad revenue. Saying there's other services is like saying you can get a non Doctor pepper, coke, Pepsi product at a soda fountain. Yes tbey exist but rare and lack scaleThere’s many more video hosting sites besides YouTube. Also other forms of social media outside of facebook. There’s no insanely high barrier to overcome when creating your own video or image hosting website with social media features, no single seller of such a service.
You confusing “popular” with the definition of an actual monopoly. The people who made FB and YouTube can set their rules for their own sites and if infowars doesn’t like them there’s nothing stopping them from posting elsewhere or making their own sites, except the frustration that it won’t be as cheap and convenient to get views, but that’s not FB or YouTube’s problem.
I wasn't aware of much of the stuff he said and done but watching the first 10 seconds of this great video all I can say is, good riddance!
There’s many more video hosting sites besides YouTube. Also other forms of social media outside of facebook. There’s no insanely high barrier to overcome when creating your own video or image hosting website with social media features, no single seller of such a service.
You confusing “popular” with the definition of an actual monopoly. The people who made FB and YouTube can set their rules for their own sites and if infowars doesn’t like them there’s nothing stopping them from posting elsewhere or making their own sites, except the frustration that it won’t be as cheap and convenient to get views, but that’s not FB or YouTube’s problem.
It could be interpreted either way which obviously was his intent.
I actually don't think he should be banned but I don't really care either.I'm glad you answered truthfully that it wasn't a death threat. Everything Alex Jones says is with a sensationalized flair and people will read into with whatever bias they choose.
I actually don't think he should be banned but I don't really care either.
I watched a video from an alpha male theory guy about how males "test eachother's social dominance" and it was absolutely deliciously ridiculous. Diametrically opposite to my point of view but it hones your critical thinking skill to plow through heaps of pseudoscientific bullshit like alpha theory.I know you are focusing on Alex Jones being banned specifically but the larger more pertinent issue is corporations or a certain segment deciding what the masses actually get to hear. Its a dangerous concept as less and less people are able to decide for themselves on important issues and are instead fed easy to digest propoganda. This issue should upset everyone and not just be a left/ right thing. Our freedoms have been eroding for years and both parties have had a hand in that. I don't need some programming dorks to decide what content I will view or not view.