Dynomitious
Blue Belt
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 741
- Reaction score
- 0
Found a nice infograph picture on reddit about the UFC events in 2012.
Release the hounds.
Release the hounds.
Is it safe to say the whole point of that infogram was to show that Greg Jackson's camp has the lowest finish percentage?
Yup. It's a fact though, so I don't see a problem with it.Is it safe to say the whole point of that infogram was to show that Greg Jackson's camp has the lowest finish percentage?
Yup. It's a fact though, so I don't see a problem with it.
Is it safe to say the whole point of that infogram was to show that Greg Jackson's camp has the lowest finish percentage?
It might make it higher, but it still probably wouldn't be high enough to change their standing in the "rankings".Their list of fighters is incomplete. Don't know if it would make the % higher or lower but it is certainly wrong.
It might make it higher, but it still probably wouldn't be high enough to change their standing in the "rankings".
It might make it higher, but it still probably wouldn't be high enough to change their standing in the "rankings".
Edit: I guess it could put them above Tristar, but that's about it.
No it could change it completely because how many ko wins/loses involving Jackson fighters are counted for other camps but not them? No way of knowing.
They could do it again and use the list from Jackson's own website.
http://www.jacksons.tv/index.php/team-jackson-winkeljohn
I don't know how the numbers for the other camps would be effected, but if you use the list over fighters on jackson's page their fighters finished 33% of their fights, 32% if you count GSP as a jackson fighter.
I doubt the other camps would drop enough to really change the order of the camps on that list.
Jackson fighters fought 24 times in the UFC during 2012. They won 8 of those by (T)KO/Sub, the rest were either loses or decision wins.You did win and lose? That table is both.