• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Indiana GOP/Democratic Primaries

Who wins the majority of delegates in each party for this primary? (Pick 2)

  • Total voters
    48
SouthoftheAndes said:
About 670 or more miles of fencing has been completed already man.

border_map.gif


Also,

3nta91cus4jd3sfs.jpg


rXJOibM.png


608097-c51944ae-9c4c-11e4-86b2-7ba151851551.jpg


Israeli-barriers-map-001.png





Also, LOL at thinking that the country which spends +$600 billion on military, not to mention $100 billion or so on the "department of homeland security' would NOT be able to secure a 1954 mile border. And that somehow the U.S. is incapable of using force to secure the border.
Click to expand...

Tell us, SOA, why do you hate Mexicans?
 
TheComebackKid said:
This is what you offered as far as addressing the problem...

Address the immigration system? In what way?

Address the drug market which causes so much violence in the countries people are fleeing from? So we have to wage an international war on drugs and somehow prevent drug trafficking across international borders that we, in your opinion, have no ability to secure?

These aren't serious suggestions which is all the do nothing team ever offers.
Click to expand...

We address the immigration system by making it easier and cheaper for those who simply want to work to support there families to come here. As for the drug war we don't have to fight a war. It will sound radical, but if we make drugs legal and cheaper then the illegal one we take the money out of the illegal trade and kill it.
 
DANA LOESCH JUST SAID "CUCKSERVATIVE" ON KELLY'S SHOW.

ohshit.gif
 
dontsnitch said:
Tell us, SOA, why do you hate Mexicans?
Click to expand...

I don't and if you look at my posting history you might say or infer that I am Mexican or of 'Mexican descent' whatever that means.

In any case I do not hate Mexicans and don't see how wanting to enforce a border is somehow equivalent to hate. In fact id argue that anyone against securing the border is a person who hates Mexicans and a racist who wants Hispanic immigrants to be used as slave labor, and who wants to prevent them from getting legal or working status in this country so they can continue being exploited. Furthermore, anyone against securing the border is likely a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile and or supporter of sex trafficking and of the drug trade.

In fact the truly progressive thinking would be to secure the border and help stem the flow of sex trafficked women/children across it and stop the flow of drugs. And lastly we already have 700 miles of fencing, and NOT all of the 1,950 mile border needs to be fenced off. In any case constructing another 400 miles of fencing would take us to 56.41% completion of a sealed off border.

In fact constructing another 400 miles of fencing is relatively easy and we could construct another 600 miles in key areas and that would take us to 66.67% completion of the border fence.
 
SouthoftheAndes said:
About 670 or more miles of fencing has been completed already man.

Also, LOL at thinking that the country which spends +$600 billion on military, not to mention $100 billion or so on the "department of homeland security' would NOT be able to secure a 1954 mile border. And that somehow the U.S. is incapable of using force to secure the border.
Click to expand...

Yes that is want I think. 600 miles of wall already and how many still cross each day?
 
SouthoftheAndes said:
I don't and if you look at my posting history you might say or infer that I am Mexican or of 'Mexican descent' whatever that means.

In any case I do not hate Mexicans and don't see how wanting to enforce a border is somehow equivalent to hate. In fact id argue that anyone against securing the border is a person who hates Mexicans and a racist who wants Hispanic immigrants to be used as slave labor, and who wants to prevent them from getting legal or working status in this country so they can continue being exploited. Furthermore, anyone against securing the border is likely a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile and or supporter of sex trafficking and of the drug trade.

In fact the truly progressive thinking would be to secure the border and help stem the flow of sex trafficked women/children across it and stop the flow of drugs. And lastly we already have 700 miles of fencing, and NOT all of the 1,950 mile border needs to be fenced off. In any case constructing another 400 miles of fencing would take us to 56.41% completion of a sealed off border.

In fact constructing another 400 miles of fencing is relatively easy and we could construct another 600 miles in key areas and that would take us to 66.67% completion of the border fence.
Click to expand...

I like your serious response to my sarcastic comment. Only a fool would conclude that you're racist because you object to illegal immigrants.
 
m52nickerson said:
We address the immigration system by making it easier and cheaper for those who simply want to work to support there families to come here.
Click to expand...

So in order to prevent trespassing we just have to allow everyone in quicker?

As for the drug war we don't have to fight a war. It will sound radical, but if we make drugs legal and cheaper then the illegal one we take the money out of the illegal trade and kill it.
Click to expand...

I totally disagree with this approach but I respect your willingness to go there. What I don't understand is how you are completely comfortable going full Ron Paul on the drug issue but then laugh at those who tout building a wall to fight immigration. It's kind of like the pot calling the kettle radical, ya know?
 
TheComebackKid said:
So in order to prevent trespassing we just have to allow everyone in quicker?
Click to expand...

Do you read? No not everyone. You would still conduct screening.

TheComebackKid said:
I totally disagree with this approach but I respect your willingness to go there. What I don't understand is how you are completely comfortable going full Ron Paul on the drug issue but then laugh at those who tout building a wall to fight immigration. It's kind of like the pot calling the kettle radical, ya know?
Click to expand...
Only one addresses the under lying problem, the other get you more tunnels.
 
SouthoftheAndes said:
I don't and if you look at my posting history you might say or infer that I am Mexican or of 'Mexican descent' whatever that means.

In any case I do not hate Mexicans and don't see how wanting to enforce a border is somehow equivalent to hate. In fact id argue that anyone against securing the border is a person who hates Mexicans and a racist who wants Hispanic immigrants to be used as slave labor, and who wants to prevent them from getting legal or working status in this country so they can continue being exploited. Furthermore, anyone against securing the border is likely a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile and or supporter of sex trafficking and of the drug trade.

In fact the truly progressive thinking would be to secure the border and help stem the flow of sex trafficked women/children across it and stop the flow of drugs. And lastly we already have 700 miles of fencing, and NOT all of the 1,950 mile border needs to be fenced off. In any case constructing another 400 miles of fencing would take us to 56.41% completion of a sealed off border.

In fact constructing another 400 miles of fencing is relatively easy and we could construct another 600 miles in key areas and that would take us to 66.67% completion of the border fence.
Click to expand...

Do you plan on patrolling the whole thing?
 

That was worse than the Trump manger hand on girl tape lol
 

It's actually amazing how often Cruz puts himself in weird awkward situations
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,175
Messages
58,422,349
Members
176,033
Latest member
ManoFan

Share this page

Back
Top