Increasing UFC roster and one belt.

[Panmisiek]

What do you guys think about it? I got feeling that there should be more than 1 belt in some divisions but it does not make any sense at the same time.

But does increasing roster of fighters who have to win 5-7 fights in a row to get crack at the title is fair compared to what was 10 years ago where fighters were 2 or even 1 fight away from the title shot?

I mean some fighters on longest streaks at some point losing their momentum and become gatekeepers which UFC hardly know what to do with.

Is there a room for any more "belts" or solutions to this or perhaps u dont see any issues?

 

[dickcheney]

Wat?

 

[nanika]

 

[dim_]

You might have a pride Avatar, but we all know you are really just a WWE fan

What you thinking? Intercontintal title? US Title? Diva Championship?

 

[Clippy]

Intercontinental champion? Tag team champion???

???

STOP TRYING TO MAKE THIS WRESTLING!!!

 

[RouseyBeatsMcgregor]

 

[Panmisiek]

Intercontinental champion? Tag team champion???

???

STOP TRYING TO MAKE THIS WRESTLING!!!

Absolutely not, but when you take a look at woman bantamweight div, the only people in the title picture right now is Nunes, Tate, Rousey and Holm. And thats it. No one else is even considered right now.

 

[Luke Rockhard]

No. We don't need multiple belts in weight classes.

But IMO the UFC did miss a great opportunity to keep the WEC and have it as a league like the NBA's D league. Keep it on free tv, let prospects fight and send down UFC fighters who need work/improvements. Have a clause in their contract that at anytime champions or other fighters could be brought up to the UFC as needed.

 

[agus_bombonera]

What do you guys think about it? I got feeling that there should be more than 1 belt in some divisions but it does not make any sense at the same time.

But does increasing roster of fighters who have to win 5-7 fights in a row to get crack at the title is fair compared to what was 10 years ago where fighters were 2 or even 1 fight away from the title shot?

I mean some fighters on longest streaks at some point losing their momentum and become gatekeepers which UFC hardly know what to do with.

Is there a room for any more "belts" or solutions to this or perhaps u dont see any issues?

what shit are you talkin about? c'mon bro UFC is not wwe or that kind of shit

 

[Optimus15]

He means like boxing.

 

[Fahrenheit1221]

At the rate they're going you're going to have to earn an Interim belt in order to get a guarantee that you'll someday get a title shot.

 

[dim_]

Absolutely not, but when you take a look at woman bantamweight div, the only people in the title picture right now is Nunes, Tate, Rousey and Holm. And thats it. No one else is even considered right now.

thats because outside of Tate, Rousey, Nunes and Holm (and cat) EVERYONE IS SHITE

 

[MMAProfessional]

In the mens division there is only two that can be done. That being one below Fly which would be even less desired because of the less finishes which is the problem with Fly already. Or you have Super HW which would be hard to even make unless you split up the already shallow HW division or make it for people that weight more then HWs which would have barely anyone, especially with the no roid policy.

 

[Clippy]

Absolutely not, but when you take a look at woman bantamweight div, the only people in the title picture right now is Nunes, Tate, Rousey and Holm. And thats it. No one else is even considered right now.

Nobody will care about a belt that represents the not as good championship....

Wait isn't that Bellator?

 

[Pliny Pete]

Absolutely not, but when you take a look at woman bantamweight div, the only people in the title picture right now is Nunes, Tate, Rousey and Holm. And thats it. No one else is even considered right now.

Well then maybe they should work to get better instead of watering down the title by making it easier to be a champion
Your idea is terrible

 

[cade187]

So you want the UFC to start handing out consolation prizes?

 

[Tormund]

No, belts are so much significant in the UFC than in boxing because there's just one belt per division, fuck more belts

 

[papasmurf999]

You might have a pride Avatar, but we all know you are really just a WWE fan

What you thinking? Intercontintal title? US Title? Diva Championship?

It's women's championship now.

 

[Panmisiek]

No, belts are so much significant in the UFC than in boxing because there's just one belt per division, fuck more belts

So what with fighters like Velasquez holding entire division just because he keeps getting injured?

 

[dim_]

Obligatory Png