To that point, I say repeatedly that a big problem within that space is that they're attached to an outdated value system. Speaking broadly, they're expecting women to be seeking the same things that women in the 19th century or early 20th century were seeking. And what women are seeking has evolved. And these guys, who have attached their sense of masculinity to their ability to get women, but are trying to land modern women with outdated appeals. They're fishing with the wrong bait so to speak.
How they got there is complicated and, as you note, therapy is probably needed to get many of them to redefine how they demonstrate male value.
Probably the biggest change and the one they struggle with the most is the economic value component. It has moved from the top of the list downwards. And with that downward shift has come a shift on the sex vs. security trade off. Economic production has shifted from the guy's lead element to his compensatory element. Meaning that, previously, income was how he would land the chick and personality was just a differentiator between equally economically successful men. Now personality and other elements are how he lands a chick and income is a differentiator between equally personable men.
It used to be that you used personality to make up for not having money, now you have to use money to make up for not having a personality. And too many of these guys don't seek a path towards personality, rather they're still seeking a path towards income and that means they're going to struggle with finding/attracting women during these early reproductive years because they're not going to be economically successful until later in their careers.