Immediate rematches for title should only happen after a split decision...

[JKS]

Or a very bad decision.

There could be rare cases like a very long time champ losing and getting a rematch

 

[PoisonGodMachin]

You are incorrect

 

[evildog46]

Close fight, bad decision, A. Silva type reign yes rematch.. 4rd beating followed by a finish no dice.. What 2 defenses?? No rematch.

 

[TonyTodd]

I read it, but his post contradicts the title, which is what I'm responding too. A close fight is a close fight no matter how the judges score it.

If you can't understand what he's saying unless its spelled out in bold for you, then either take a reading comprehension class or stop being a dick

 

[GUSWER**]

Or very close fight if the refs blow it. Renan got his ass beat and finished. I don't think he should get an immediate rematch. Make him fight once first. I guess there aren't many options but still, he got his ass kicked. TJ deserves a new challenge. Rematches for title should happen for fights like GSP/Hendricks, Gus/Jones, Chael/Andy (not SD but Chael was on his way to a UD), etc. Thoughts?

Your opinion, thank god, doesn't mean shit.

 

[Jorge Luis Borges]

Barao was undefeated since 2005 before losing to Dillashaw.

This is a obvious business move by The UFC. I'd be much more excited to see the outcome of Dillashaw vs Barao 2 then Dillashaw vs Assun

 

[GUSWER**]

That's still BS imo. Dillashaw/Faber would make more than a re-match with a guy he beat to a pulp and finished.

Faber?! How many title shots will that midget be gifted? Just shut the fuck up, hater.

 

[Megatronlee]

There is no "earning" it. If They defended that thing a few times they more than earned the rematch if they want it. wtf you mean EARN