IG Report to blast FBI

[Deleted member 429137]

Just LOFL!!!!!

Maybe you could team up with @Bloodworth . He had a spiel for awhile about how making fun of Trump's orange skin was exactly like discriminating against blacks. It sounds like you're going down the same tard path he already went down. You guys can exchange barely-literate ideas.

 

[SBJJ]

Maybe you could team up with @Bloodworth . He had a spiel for awhile about how making fun of Trump's orange skin was exactly like discriminating against blacks. It sounds like you're going down the same tard path he already went down. You guys can exchange barely-literate ideas.

Nope. Trump insults people plenty. He can and should handle it coming back

But comparing that to what happened with these lead agents is very TROLL worthy

U sir get another Derp

 

[Deleted member 429137]

Nope. Trump insults people plenty. He can and should handle it coming back

But comparing that to what happened with these lead agents is very TROLL worthy

U sir get another Derp

Oh, right, Bloodworth's ideas are idiotic. Totally unlike yours. My bad.

 

[ShadowRun]

Trumptards. Haven't you been listening? Dumb is the new black.

Great answer, I can't imagine why your threads get dumped weekly

 

[Deleted member 429137]

Great answer, I can't imagine why your threads get dumped weekly

You've got me confused with someone else.

 

[SBJJ]

Oh, right, Bloodworth's ideas are idiotic. Totally unlike yours. My bad.

I didn’t say his ideas were idiotic or not. But funny u had to bring him up to begin with. What I will say is your obvious trolling is getting idiotic

Do we need to quote your last 6 or 7 posts? You are all over the place and making little sense

 

[Bloodworth]

Maybe you could team up with @Bloodworth . He had a spiel for awhile about how making fun of Trump's orange skin was exactly like discriminating against blacks. It sounds like you're going down the same tard path he already went down. You guys can exchange barely-literate ideas.

You cannot mock a persons skin color no matter what the color.
Wait maybe you can. Just exclude a few groups.

You cannot relate certain groups to animals.
Wait maybe you can. Forrest Griffin looks like a ......no harm just an observation

Most people are adults and were taught as a kids that sticks and stones may break your bones but words cannot hurt you

It's mostly parents that teach that and having 2 parents isn't popular among certain groups

 

[Seano]

Maybe you could team up with @Bloodworth . He had a spiel for awhile about how making fun of Trump's orange skin was exactly like discriminating against blacks. It sounds like you're going down the same tard path he already went down. You guys can exchange barely-literate ideas.

How is judging the man on his appearance that much different than judging him on his skin? How big of a leap do you think that is? When a thought is peppered with comments about a guys appearance, how seriously should I take those comments? I just picture a neck beard fighting off the tears as he types away.
"He's Orange and a Nazi! Whaaaaa!"

 

[Neph]

How is judging the man on his appearance that much different than judging him on his skin? How big of a leap do you think that is? When a thought is peppered with comments about a guys appearance, how seriously should I take those comments? I just picture a neck beard fighting off the tears as he types away.
"He's Orange and a Nazi! Whaaaaa!"

Eh? Are you seriously unsure why there's a difference between judging on appearance v judging on skin colour? IE: judging on a choice someone made v judging on something they had no control over?

 

[Seano]

Eh? Are you seriously unsure why there's a difference between judging on appearance v judging on skin colour? IE: judging on a choice someone made v judging on something they had no control over?

Yes, I am. Judge a man on his substance (can't you do that with a guy like Trump?) or else people will not take you seriously. You guys sound like angry elementary school kids. If you can't form a decent argument without attacking a mans appearance, then its probably because your argument has little substance to begin with.

 

[Neph]

Yes, I am. Judge a man on his substance (can't you do that with a guy like Trump?) or else people will not take you seriously. You guys sound like angry elementary school kids. If you can't form a decent argument without attacking a mans appearance, then its probably because your argument has little substance to begin with.

Nice dodge and totally transparent. Also, Trumps substance is much worse than his appearance.

 

[Seano]

Nice dodge and totally transparent. Also, Trumps substance is much worse than his appearance.

I answered you promptly and directly with an appropriate response to your post.

Also, Trumps substance is much worse than his appearance.

So why do you have to resort to attacking his appearance? Seems sort of petty and simple to me.

 

[Neph]

I answered you promptly and directly with an appropriate response to your post.



So why do you have to resort to attacking his appearance? Seems sort of petty and simple to me.

It looks like a strange hybrid of Seinfeld's Kramer and Colombo.

Looks like a reunion of extras from the Wire.

Looks like a fairly typical lesbian, actually.

Looks like Golovkin after the Canelo fight.

Looks a little like Worf from Star Trek Next Generation.

WTF, looks like Gollum.

Ref looks like an extra from the Hobbit.

I'm sorry, you were saying?

Most of these are you making derogatory comments about how women look.

Get off your bullshit soapbox.

 

[Deleted member 429137]

I didn’t say his ideas were idiotic or not. But funny u had to bring him up to begin with. What I will say is your obvious trolling is getting idiotic

Do we need to quote your last 6 or 7 posts? You are all over the place and making little sense

Tell me more about this new hate crime you've invented

 

[Deleted member 429137]

How is judging the man on his appearance that much different than judging him on his skin? How big of a leap do you think that is? When a thought is peppered with comments about a guys appearance, how seriously should I take those comments? I just picture a neck beard fighting off the tears as he types away.
"He's Orange and a Nazi! Whaaaaa!"

Yeah, what *is* the difference between a man in the ruling class choosing to be orange for aesthetic (?) reasons and an entire population of people systematically oppressed over hundreds of years because of their black skin?

Surely if *you* can't think of any there most not be any, right?

 

[Deleted member 429137]

You cannot mock a persons skin color no matter what the color.
Wait maybe you can. Just exclude a few groups.

You cannot relate certain groups to animals.
Wait maybe you can. Forrest Griffin looks like a ......no harm just an observation

Most people are adults and were taught as a kids that sticks and stones may break your bones but words cannot hurt you

It's mostly parents that teach that and having 2 parents isn't popular among certain groups

Maybe you're old enough to start reasoning like an adult, hey? Or reasoning at all.

 

[Seano]

Yeah, what *is* the difference between a man in the ruling class choosing to be orange for aesthetic (?) reasons and an entire population of people systematically oppressed over hundreds of years because of their black skin?

Surely if *you* can't think of any there most not be any, right?

Don't judge people on their appearance. This is a lesson taught to kids in elementary school.

If your criticisms of the guy are 90% personal, then no one will really care what you say.

 

[Deleted member 429137]

Don't judge people on their appearance. This is a lesson taught to kids in elementary school.

If your criticisms of the guy are 90% personal, then no one will really care what you say.

It's funny how many of you have to simplify things to the level of young children in order to ignore things like the
difference between a man in the ruling class choosing to be orange for aesthetic (?) reasons and an entire population of people systematically oppressed over hundreds of years because of their black skin.

Truly, the alt right is the party of great thinkers.

 

[Seano]

It's funny how many of you have to simplify things to the level of young children in order to ignore things like the
difference between a man in the ruling class choosing to be orange for aesthetic (?) reasons and an entire population of people systematically oppressed over hundreds of years because of their black skin.

Truly, the alt right is the party of great thinkers.

I'm not taking anyone seriously who can't form an argument beyond the 4th grade level. If you can't make a point without peppering it with swears and derogatory comments, then your point is garbage and not worthy of consideration.

 

[Quequeg]

Maybe you could team up with @Bloodworth . He had a spiel for awhile about how making fun of Trump's orange skin was exactly like discriminating against blacks. It sounds like you're going down the same tard path he already went down. You guys can exchange barely-literate ideas.

That argument is amazingly stupid right up there with the Democrats being the party of the KKK today, and right wingers whine about being called dumb after advancing ideas like this?