IG Report to blast FBI

[SBJJ]

I believe many people are conflating 2 issues. The IG says he found no bias in the Clinton E Mail case. I do not believe he states that about the Texts. In fact I believe he states in the report something about certain agents having a bias that would include using their positions to influence or affect the electorate

 

[SBJJ]

Yes. Here it is. The IG is speaking of the Email case when he speaks of no bias. Many in the media are trying to say that also covers the Texts. Which as u can see it does not

I’m thinking the next IG report will be very interesting

 

[emefer]

Can’t wait until we find that the fbi colluded to get trump elected.

 

[Darkballs]

I’m thinking the next IG report will be very interesting

It's always the next report.

I'm sure two agents who exchanged text messages about how they thought trump was a twat and were subsequently and immediately removed from that investigation, will sink everything.

I think this is a good standard to have. Despite no evidence that they took any measure to shape or alter the investigation in any way, nor that they had any affect on Mueller (who fired them), they said they didn't like trump in their personal correspondence. Cancelling the whole investigation is the only solution. We should further go back and find out if any law enforcement personnel ever mentioned there dislike for a suspect in a personal conversation, and throw out those convictions as well. Only way to be sure there isn't bias.

 

[Bloody Pulp]

“Two agents” and/or the lead investigator and his girlfriend.

 

[SBJJ]

It's always the next report.

I'm sure two agents who exchanged text messages about how they thought trump was a twat and were subsequently and immediately removed from that investigation, will sink everything.

I think this is a good standard to have. Despite no evidence that they took any measure to shape or alter the investigation in any way, nor that they had any affect on Mueller (who fired them), they said they didn't like trump in their personal correspondence. Cancelling the whole investigation is the only solution. We should further go back and find out if any law enforcement personnel ever mentioned there dislike for a suspect in a personal conversation, and throw out those convictions as well. Only way to be sure there isn't bias.

Weird. It’s like u haven’t even read what the IG actually submitted

All these personal conversations on their work phones during work hours. Cool story Bro

Yea, if an investigator has work texts of him hating on the race, religion or politics of who they are investigating. That’s a bit of a problem

What’s hilarious about this is we have been told Trump was never under investigation. So Peter had to stop Trump from sitting in the White House despite the fact he was not under investigation. So why did he need to be stopped?

 

[bobgeese]

To be clear gentlemen, the next IG report deals with whether she was let off.

This one said there wasn’t documented evidence, in other words Comey didn’t make a memo that said “I’m going to break the law and not charge her”.

 

[Darkballs]

Yea, if an investigator has work texts of him hating on the race, religion or politics of who they are investigating. That’s a bit of a problem

Just like potential entrapment was a problem?
Just like them using a "spy" was a problem?

How about you explain, with any particularity, the legal standard for terminating an investigation based off of the personal texts of investigators. What current standard have the courts passed down to us?

 

[Seano]

Just like potential entrapment was a problem?
Just like them using a "spy" was a problem?

How about you explain, with any particularity, the legal standard for terminating an investigation based off of the personal texts of investigators. What current standard have the courts passed down to us?

WTF? You don't see how two investigators displaying bias could be potential trouble for a legal case? Come on, fella.

 

[SBJJ]

Just like potential entrapment was a problem?
Just like them using a "spy" was a problem?

How about you explain, with any particularity, the legal standard for terminating an investigation based off of the personal texts of investigators. What current standard have the courts passed down to us?

Who said terminate an investigation?

Who has said Trump is under investigation?

Are you actually following what is going on?

Even some of the MSM is now taking notice but sadly I think you will never realize what was going on here.

 

[Darkballs]

WTF? You don't see how two investigators displaying bias could be potential trouble for a legal case? Come on, fella.

What would the trouble be? What do these personal texts mean? You've shown nothing other than two people in the fbi sent personal texts saying they disliked the president.

What would you do? What is the standard? Should the investigation be terminated because two minor players had a personal dislike for their suspect before they were fired? Should this apply to all law enforcement when they communicate their dislike for someone they're investigating? Do you have any evidence that this personal dislike shaped the investigation in any way?

 

[Darkballs]

Who said terminate an investigation?

Two agents sent text messages saying they thought trump was a bitch. They got fired. So now what do you do?

That's as plain a question as I can ask you boy.

 

[SBJJ]

WTF? You don't see how two investigators displaying bias could be potential trouble for a legal case? Come on, fella.

He says he’s a lawyer.

How we forget about mr mark furman in the OJ case. A hate filled investigator can destroy a case

 

[bobgeese]

Just like potential entrapment was a problem?
Just like them using a "spy" was a problem?

How about you explain, with any particularity, the legal standard for terminating an investigation based off of the personal texts of investigators. What current standard have the courts passed down to us?

1 - The IG will be investigating the spying on trump. The next one up is if they let Hillary off the hook. Patients grasshopper.

2- I’m not sure a legal standard needs to be reached, you just need enough pissed off republican leaders. There is already talk of impeaching rosenstien.

I was honestly surprised to see republicans going after Meuller hard today.


Popcorn worthy indeed.

 

[SBJJ]

What would the trouble be? What do these personal texts mean? You've shown nothing other than two people in the fbi sent personal texts saying they disliked the president.

What would you do? What is the standard? Should the investigation be terminated because two minor players had a personal dislike for their suspect before they were fired? Should this apply to all law enforcement when they communicate their dislike for someone they're investigating? Do you have any evidence that this personal dislike shaped the investigation in any way?

Obviously u have not brushed up on this report

#1. Saying Strzok was a minor player shows an unbelievable amount of ignorance that disqualifies you from ever being taken seriously

#2. Yea. They just texted a dislike for Trump. They didn’t text anything more substantial. You are correct, there were no recent texts released that were greater than “I don’t like this Trump guy”


It’s as if you have been in a bank vault with no communication during all this

 

[Darkballs]

He says he’s a lawyer.

Third time I've asked you what the correct legal standard is, or what you think should be done.

Third time you didn't answer. If you're not going to you don't need to respond.

 

[Darkballs]

Obviously u have not brushed up on this report

#1. Saying Strzok was a minor player shows an unbelievable amount of ignorance that disqualifies you from ever being taken seriously

I'll have trouble sleeping tonight worrying about what you think of me. So do you have any proof that ANYONE who exchanged text messages unfairly influenced Mueller or the investigation at all?

Anything will do here.

#2. Yea. They just texted a dislike for Trump. They didn’t text anything more substantial. You are correct, there were no recent texts released that were greater than “I don’t like this Trump guy”

The legality of an investigation doesn't turn on how mean the investigators were.

 

[Cojopi Extomino]

No evidence of course, just "the next one".

Funny times when a report comes out indicting the state of the FBI as a whole during the election, and Trump fans are like "AHA! Gotcha!". It's weird how you guys don't remember WHAT THE FBI DID BEFORE THE ELECTION. Or how much you loved them for it.

Now it's "oh man that corrupt FBI influencing the election that Trump won! Trying to make him lose! Yeah, that's what happened."

Idiots.

 

[Cojopi Extomino]

I know we're waiting on the next bombshell report now, but how many bombshell reports are we gonna get before one actually has a bombshell in it? Like, evidence of a crime or something? I guess we'll just have to wait for Mueller to finish....

Would you like to wager that we see some indictments or plea deals from some FBI agents

I've been told by a lot of Trump fans indictments and plea deals don't mean much. Or wait did Trump not really know those guys? Or were they wrongly charged? I honestly can't remember what spin you clowns landed on.

And I'll take you up on that bet, my car for your car. If you back out, you have to commit suicide with a car exhaust while eating cheetos, on video. Come on betting man LET'S GO!

 

[SBJJ]

I'll have trouble sleeping tonight worrying about what you think of me. So do you have any proof that ANYONE who exchanged text messages unfairly influenced Mueller or the investigation at all?

Anything will do here.



The legality of an investigation doesn't turn on how mean the investigators were.

What case? Are they investigating Trump now?

What happened with those 2 minor characters? The Head Agent was a minor character?

Did you read the IG report and what he actually concluded about Strzok? Because he really disagrees with you

Here is ONE for you. The Emails on the Weiner laptop were sat on for a month. The IG states there is no rational reason why this happened. You know who sat on those Emails? The minor character that you say sort of disliked Trump.

Again, you are one of the last diehards here. Even the MSM is starting to catch on