Ido talking about not training with vegans

Lifelong vegetarian -the old fashion kind who eats dairy but no fish/meat. Im 50 ,pretty muscular strong and can still hang with the young pups in sports and some general sparring -id say i def have the strength advantage but its harder for me to recover after ive lost my breath and am going hard.

As far as diet your body's metabolism will become efficient at whatver it is its used to breaking down throughout the day and converting to your body's needs -so if its used to red meat -its gonna crave red meat for a loooong time should you ever convert to some other dramatic food lifestyle
 
Vegetarian diet is good, but vegan diet is very difficult to maintain without being malnutritioned.
A vegan diet is good as well - but i agree that you have to look out for some important nutrients, although that's advisable for any diet.
There are no indigenous people living like that for a reason. There are carnivore people though.
The reason is mostly that they're used to eating meat; it's not like they sit around - to my knowledge at least - and discuss the ethics of meat, fish, eggs and milk and their impact on the environment or something like that.
In fact, since indigenous tribes eat many things raw (at least those that are in principle edible raw) they probably also get some nutrients that we don't get as easily.
 
Gonna keep posting this. Even shaolin monks dont like the idea of vegans.



That come's from Buddhist pihlosophy taught by Gotma (the Buddha), which preached "The Middle Way" between aceticism and family/normal life. It's not like it's grounded in science or because they tried it and it didn't work or anything - also, why are you saying "even Shaolin monks"?
 
That being said, it is important to eat a BALANCED diet. The problem is many simple-minded meateaters don't put enough vegetables and grains through their systems.

Red meat is a type 2 carcinogen certified by the WHO and leads to atheroclerosis (sat fat + dietary cholesterol) and so does white meat. So yeah eat balanced in terms of getting all of the nutrients you need, but this "eat balanced" bullshit is always used to justify eating meat. It isn't giving you anything you can't get elsewhere with less health risk baggage.
 
B652dgg
Vegandiet2.jpg


Vegandiet.jpg


Yeah a vegan diet totally lacks protein, omega 3s, and B vitamins bro!!!! /sarcasm
 
Lifelong vegetarian -the old fashion kind who eats dairy but no fish/meat. Im 50 ,pretty muscular strong and can still hang with the young pups in sports and some general sparring -id say i def have the strength advantage but its harder for me to recover after ive lost my breath and am going hard.

As far as diet your body's metabolism will become efficient at whatver it is its used to breaking down throughout the day and converting to your body's needs -so if its used to red meat -its gonna crave red meat for a loooong time should you ever convert to some other dramatic food lifestyle
Vegan and Vegetarian are not the same thing being a Vegetarian is a lot more doable than being a Vegan.
 
Which part did you get from actual scientific litterature?

Apparently you're in grave danger if you eat anything before getting 23andmed first... LMFAO
And the part on irradated food, it's all made up by activists websites.
Everything I said is from scientific literature & you're a fucking government shill if you're trying to tell me irradiation is a myth.

On top of that, you're a fucking jackass for exaggerating my point about having genetic testing done. It's very important for people who actually care about their health to recognize what they are natually unable to process compared to the norm. All we get in regular media are these generic diets that are supposed to work for everyone. Well nothing works for everyone because we all have these varieties of genetic variances. So figure out what yours are & you're ahead of the game. It should be top priority imo to anyone looking to start a healthy lifestyle.

Are you even fit? Like I imagine you weigh like 400 lbs & live in your mom's basement trying to talk shit to honest people who are talking about real things while you haven't so much as read a single article on health.

I'm here for you, but you gotta drop this front or I won't be able to get through.
 
Humans are omnivores ..your plate should be 60 to 70% meat and the rest veggies/carbs...(Carbs are optional)..nature provides all that we need...bread, pasta, bagels, cake, ETC arent found in nature...therefore not needed...





That is all...


I will now leave these pictures as my way of gracefully exiting this thread
more-extreme-harley-davidson-choppers-from-custom-wolf-photo-gallery-62897-7.jpg ca1eb02833c2b39fd3dd51616e23afb9.jpg 7222859b833b692265fe7a8d6d1efb31.jpg
 
We got some Vegans who do BJJ and wrestling at our gym and they are weak ass piss. Its like kids rolling with adults.
In case you are implying that them being weak according to you is an effect of their diet, it's the same thing as saying: "many artists suffer from mental illnesses, it must be the art that makes them mentally ill."

That being said, i did mention in this thread that it is easier to get a high biological value when it comes to protein with animal products, but it's definitely not the case that the ability to build muscle and/or strength is compromised to an extent where you'd say you can't get extremely strong/muscular on that diet.
(Besides the other guy, i also posted a list with (over) 10 vegan athletes and there's an olympic lifter amongst them.)

Biological value of a protein = how convenient it is for the organism to be turned into muscle and it is based on the balance/relationship of its amino acid profile, preparation (cooking) and vitamin and mineral content.
The criticism that plant based proteins receive compared to those found in animal products, are that they are lacking in some of the essential amino acids.
Whey protein concentrate has the highest biological value amongst all proteins, which subsequently means that all the amino acids stand are in the best relation to each other, compared to all other proteins.

That being said, the biological value of a protein is only really a concern if you're ingesting a single protein source per day or even a longer period of time, because by combining protein sources which complement each other, the biological value goes up. Tuna: 92
In a vegan diet, an example of this would be the combination of grains (most of the times lacking the amino acid lysine) with legumes (lacking the amino acid methionine).

Here are all common foodstuffs ranked by their biological value (taken from Wikipedia):
Whey protein concentrate: 104
Whole egg: 100
Whey Protein: 96
Whole Soy Bean: 96
Human milk: 95
Chicken egg: 94
Tuna: 92
Soybean milk: 91
Cow milk: 91
Buckwheat: 90+
Cow milk: 90
Cheese: 84
Quinoa: 83
Rice: 83
Defatted soy flour: 81
Beef: 80
Chicken: 79
Casein: 77
Fish: 76
Beef: 74.3
Soybean protein isolate: 74
Pork: 70
Immature bean: 65
Full-fat soy flour: 64
Soybean curd (tofu): 64
Wheat gluten: 64
Whole wheat: 64
White flour: 41

In regards to this chart and topic, i want to explain two more things.
One, the value 100 doesn't mean 100 percent, but is just the number assigned to the value of whole egg since it serves as "reference protein".
Two, combining two proteins which both have a high biological value do not necessarily make for a higher biological value combination than combining two proteins which both have a low biological value - the biological value of a combination depends almost exclusively on if the proteins making up the combination complement their protein profiles of the other, some examples of double protein combos will follow below.
Green = plants
Yellow = eggs, dairy
Red = meat

65 % potatoes + 35 % whole egg:136
75 % cow milk + 25 % wheat flour: 123
60 % chicken egg + 40 % soy: 122
71 % chicken egg + 29 % cow milk: 122
85 % rice + 15 % yeast: 118
68 % chicken egg + 32 % wheat: 118
77 % beef + 23 % potatoes: 114
55 % soy + 45 % rice: 111
75 % cow milk + 25 % wheat: 105
55 % potatoes + 45 % soy: 103
52 % beans + 48 % corn: 101

So yeah, veganism doesn't stand in contrast to getting all essential amino acids in sufficient amounts, nor does it stand in contrast to being able to make meals/diet plans which are high in protein with a great amount of biological value.

Cheers mate!
 
Humans are omnivores ..your plate should be 60 to 70% meat and the rest veggies/carbs...(Carbs are optional)..nature provides all that we need...bread, pasta, bagels, cake, ETC arent found in nature...therefore not needed...





That is all...


I will now leave these pictures as my way of gracefully exiting this thread
View attachment 825293 View attachment 825294 View attachment 825295
I respectfully disagree.
According to multiple institutes of nutrition (which i've also quoted multiple times ITT) your plate doesn't need any animal products on it at all for you to be perfectly healthy!

Appreciate the pictures though, but i'm not sure if the thread has ended yet - not just because i just answered a whole lotta text to Swarthy in the post above yours.

Either way, have a good day sir!
 
Not really. Oral cyanocobalmin abosrbs just as much as an injection.
I stopped taking b12 years ago because I was told that it doesn't absorb, they said Cyanocoblimin is cyanide or turns into cyanide and becomes toxic in the liver and to get Methcoblimin version.

I wonder what brand do you take? I took some country life B complex vitamins two years ago they were expensive and they made me get some big ass cystic acne on my back and two on my forehead also made me sleepy.
 
In case you are implying that them being weak according to you is an effect of their diet, it's the same thing as saying: "many artists suffer from mental illnesses, it must be the art that makes them mentally ill."

That being said, i did mention in this thread that it is easier to get a high biological value when it comes to protein with animal products, but it's definitely not the case that the ability to build muscle and/or strength is compromised to an extent where you'd say you can't get extremely strong/muscular on that diet.
(Besides the other guy, i also posted a list with (over) 10 vegan athletes and there's an olympic lifter amongst them.)

Biological value of a protein = how convenient it is for the organism to be turned into muscle and it is based on the balance/relationship of its amino acid profile, preparation (cooking) and vitamin and mineral content.
The criticism that plant based proteins receive compared to those found in animal products, are that they are lacking in some of the essential amino acids.
Whey protein concentrate has the highest biological value amongst all proteins, which subsequently means that all the amino acids stand are in the best relation to each other, compared to all other proteins.

That being said, the biological value of a protein is only really a concern if you're ingesting a single protein source per day or even a longer period of time, because by combining protein sources which complement each other, the biological value goes up. Tuna: 92
In a vegan diet, an example of this would be the combination of grains (most of the times lacking the amino acid lysine) with legumes (lacking the amino acid methionine).

Here are all common foodstuffs ranked by their biological value (taken from Wikipedia):
Whey protein concentrate: 104
Whole egg: 100
Whey Protein: 96
Whole Soy Bean: 96
Human milk: 95
Chicken egg: 94
Tuna: 92
Soybean milk: 91
Cow milk: 91
Buckwheat: 90+
Cow milk: 90
Cheese: 84
Quinoa: 83
Rice: 83
Defatted soy flour: 81
Beef: 80
Chicken: 79
Casein: 77
Fish: 76
Beef: 74.3
Soybean protein isolate: 74
Pork: 70
Immature bean: 65
Full-fat soy flour: 64
Soybean curd (tofu): 64
Wheat gluten: 64
Whole wheat: 64
White flour: 41

In regards to this chart and topic, i want to explain two more things.
One, the value 100 doesn't mean 100 percent, but is just the number assigned to the value of whole egg since it serves as "reference protein".
Two, combining two proteins which both have a high biological value do not necessarily make for a higher biological value combination than combining two proteins which both have a low biological value - the biological value of a combination depends almost exclusively on if the proteins making up the combination complement their protein profiles of the other, some examples of double protein combos will follow below.
Green = plants
Yellow = eggs, dairy
Red = meat

65 % potatoes + 35 % whole egg:136
75 % cow milk + 25 % wheat flour: 123
60 % chicken egg + 40 % soy: 122
71 % chicken egg + 29 % cow milk: 122
85 % rice + 15 % yeast: 118
68 % chicken egg + 32 % wheat: 118
77 % beef + 23 % potatoes: 114
55 % soy + 45 % rice: 111
75 % cow milk + 25 % wheat: 105
55 % potatoes + 45 % soy: 103
52 % beans + 48 % corn: 101

So yeah, veganism doesn't stand in contrast to getting all essential amino acids in sufficient amounts, nor does it stand in contrast to being able to make meals/diet plans which are high in protein with a great amount of biological value.

Cheers mate!

Im 102 Kilo’s and pretty strong I roll with a 125 kilo 6”4 dude who is vegan and who is also a rank above me. I ragdoll him when we wrestle and roll and I am not the only guy.

Only thing we do different is what we eat. (He can’t lift as much either.) dude is weak as the tofu he eats.
 
Yeah sure.... show it.
What do you want to know? I said a lot of things.... and you seem to be some sort of shit talking smart ass troll... so I'm not going to sit here & find every single reference to every single fucking thing I said. if there's something in particular you are questioning then tell me what that is & I'll give you a reference to its validity.

Questioning irradiation as being a myth isn't even worthy of debate. 100% fact they sit your food in a room full of nuclear waste & then feed it to you. This isn't hidden information. Teh fucking FDA has a page on their website about it ffs while your dumb ass is making out to be an urban legend. Wise up dipshit.

Your dumb ass has probably been eating nuclear radiation all your life & that's why your brain doesn't function correctly. Look if you want to eat nuclear radiation then go right ahead, but it's straight up evil to try & bullshit people into thinking that it doesn't happen. It 100% happens daily all over the world & I'm trying to stay as far from it as possible so I don't end up a dumb ass troll like you.

The argument for its saftety is not that it doesn't harm you. It's that your body is efficient enough to fix the damage. Fun fact... you lose the ability to fix that damage as you age. So how is that safe? I'll agree it's safe for young people, but not old. I'll also agree that all the energy your body is spending rebuilding radiated DNA could've been used else where... & so if you eat a steady diet of radiation through your youth, you'll be much worse off by the time you get to retirement. They want you to die at retirement age. That's the plan & agenda you are personally backing. no good comes from eating radiation. I'm baffled that I have to explain that.

Ionizing radiation effects the atoms in living things, so it poses a health risk by damaging tissue and DNA in genes. It has sufficient energy to affect the atoms in living cells and thereby damage their genetic material (DNA). Fortunately, the cells in our bodies are extremely efficient at repairing this damage... though it gets less efficient as we age. The amount of ability of our body has to repair DNA damage is directly related to countless "age related" diseases. DNA repair is literally the lead cause of aging (Dr. David Sinclair) So without a doubt it does harm to you... but when you're younger your body is supercharged to repair the damage.

Isn't that convenient that we'll now kill off all the old people prematurely. That's the issue jerky... it doesn't kill young people... it kills old people who have worked all their lives to retire, but between irradiation & every fooking thing else they've sold you braying jackasses, you'll die sooner. I'm not buying it. I can't believe you want to eat it, but I'm not your fucking parent. Do wtf you want but don't give me a fucking lecture about how I want to live my life. & don't give me a hard time if I explain to some people who might not be aware that they're literally eating nuclear radiation that will destroy your DNA.
 
Last edited:
I always envisioned a super mma gym run by Ido Portal as touchnut teacher, coach Edmund for dem hands, Dolce is the nutrionist, Ngannous Rastaman trainer will handle wrestling and BJJ and finally, Fabia as a Sage/lover/guru and will also teach how to chase ur oponent with knife. The mma Avengers. U cant lose with that lineup!!

Tito as manager and let Hunto handle social media, Datsik could take care of legal stuff and foreign affairs
 
Tito as manager and let Hunto handle social media, Datsik could take care of legal stuff and foreign affairs
Lol forgot about Huntos social media meltdowns after the Bork fight! That shit was brutal!!
 
I'm not a vegan and I enjoy meat and believe that Humans are omnivores that always were hunting like the others hominids before/besides us. I think it's ok to eat meat because that's what our ancestors did and every culture on this earth develope a hunting culture and it was very valuable. On cave paintings you see hunting scenes and not people plucking berries (although that obviously was important too).

That said like most vegans, I don't believe in highly industrialized meat production and I don't support it. I get my meat only from free range farms or hunters directly. Meat from hunters isn't expensive and with the right way to prepare it's delicious.
 
Questioning irradiation as being a myth isn't even worthy of debate. 100% fact they sit your food in a room full of nuclear waste & then feed it to you. This isn't hidden information. Teh fucking FDA has a page on their website about it ffs while your dumb ass is making out to be an urban legend. Wise up dipshit.
You're a special kind of moron.

Ionizing radiation effects the atoms in living things, so it poses a health risk by damaging tissue and DNA in genes.
Irradiating food does not make it radioactive.
Your organic plants spend their life in ionizing UV radiation

It has sufficient energy to affect the atoms in living cells and thereby damage their genetic material (DNA).
Hahaha.
No.

Isn't that convenient that we'll now kill off all the old people prematurely.
You're the kind of guy to check whether your tide pods are organic before eating them.

That's the issue jerky... it doesn't kill young people... it kills old people who have worked all their lives to retire, but between irradiation & every fooking thing else they've sold you braying jackasses, you'll die sooner.
Beside being dead wrong and stupid, you know what killed young peoples? Food poisoning.
 
Back
Top