- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
- Messages
- 3,057
- Reaction score
- 0
yeah i got owned. thats all im saying. wrestling > bjj
Soulfly said:Woah woah woah here.
He just got beaten by a wrestler and it was a harsh experience. It is now his opinion that wrestling is more effective than BJJ. Don't flame him for it.
TexDeuceII said:Here is the equation:
Submission grappling match------no time limits:
*BJJ guy worth half a shit who has trained 5 years vs.
*Wrestler who has wrestled at elite level for 5 years=
BJJ guy winning 95% of the time. The other 5% are some brutal neckcrank/choke action or slam that wrestler pulls off.
*no cross training for either one
I have gone against a few wreslters, some collegiate level. Wrestlers have many great attributes, and I have never taken down a good wrestler. Wrestlers also excel in the scramble, and are quick to not get put on their back. I am a blue belt and always end up in my guard (open or closed doesn't matter) and will either submit them or sweep them. Gi or no gi it doesnt matter.
This is when they are new to the submission game. Once you add good submission skills to a good wrestler, they are very dangerous and can dictate where the game goes.
I have high respect for wrestlers, and have been working with them to help me on my wrestling. But BJJ>Wrestling all things being equal, and thats the bottom line.
FMBJJ said:pure Wrestling>pure BJJ
Joke
I agree with you. But here's a counter-example: wasn't Gracie vs. Kimura a BJJer vs. a Judoka? Kimura finished Gracie twice in that match. (Kimura didn't know he knocked out Gracie, and the next submission attempt brought him out of it.) Of course, that wasn't a traditional match so I'm just being an ass... :wink:Q mystic said:In a grappling match, with no time limits, a bjjer, generally, will win by sub vs judoka or wrestler. Its like math. And I'm a judoka. Thems the rules.: :icon_cry2