I am more interested in seeing DDP fight Khamzat next

[ArtardFiesta]

Sure Khamzat doesn't deserve it and has done nothing at MW, but the ufc has set a precedence of giving unwarranted title shots (chito, stipe, rountreee, colby).

I really dont care to see ddp vs strickland because I have seen it. DDp probaly does even better in a rematch and puts it away.

Just do DDP vs khamzat as that is someone he hasn't fought. DO strickland vs whittaker.

Just scrap whitaker and khamzat and replace it with jiri vs hill or chandler vs colby

 

[Bork Neslar]

I'm not.

 

[NoStoneUnturned]

I don't think this will happen. Khamzat is unreliable (sickly, weak constitution) and can't travel. I don't see the UFC offering him such a reward.

 

[TriangleMonkey]

Kham keeps it standing unless he says so

But Khamzat hardly fights anymore so Dricus could break him in later rounds

 

[TheTickG]

Sure Khamzat doesn't deserve it and has done nothing in MW, but the ufc has set a precedence of giving unwarranted title shots (chito, stipe, rountreee, colby).

I really dont care to see ddp vs strickland because I have seen it. DDp probaly does even better in a rematch and puts it away.

Just do DDP vs khamzat as that is someone he hasn't fought. DO strickland vs whittaker.

Just scrap whitaker and khamzat and replace it with jiri vs hill or chandler vs colby

If we're giving undeserving title shots, let's put Chandler in there vs. DDP. Chandler is at least willing to show up to his scheduled fights.

 

[jjjjjjjjjjohnny]

can hazmat fight in the US legally yet?

 

[Herwald]

Would be cool, but I want that Zat vs Whittaker fight now more. Fact that Robert accepted it again just makes me think he wants it and believes he can get it done.

 

[Ozze]

I would rather see him fight Khamzat too.
Too many rematches happening too fast.

But, Khamzat has to fight Whittaker first.
Hopefully he can win.

 

[Söze Aldo]

Until we have proof Khamzat's immune system can survive a fight camp without having to cancel, no way should he risk being given a title shot.

 

[Istryker]

The way people disrespect Bobby is crazy

 

[BJJ4Tone]

Sure Khamzat doesn't deserve it and has done nothing in MW, but the ufc has set a precedence of giving unwarranted title shots (chito, stipe, rountreee, colby).

I really dont care to see ddp vs strickland because I have seen it. DDp probaly does even better in a rematch and puts it away.

Just do DDP vs khamzat as that is someone he hasn't fought. DO strickland vs whittaker.

Just scrap whitaker and khamzat and replace it with jiri vs hill or chandler vs colby

Agreed!

I'd love to see that fight too. I'd also like to see fewer rematches in general, when it comes to championship fights.

And, as you pointed out, there is ABSOLUTEY a precedent for nonsensical title shots, so why not?

p.s.
Fuck Dana White

 

[BJJ4Tone]

The way people disrespect Bobby is crazy

What do you mean?

 

[Paolo Delutis]

Sure Khamzat doesn't deserve it and has done nothing in MW, but the ufc has set a precedence of giving unwarranted title shots (chito, stipe, rountreee, colby).

I really dont care to see ddp vs strickland because I have seen it. DDp probaly does even better in a rematch and puts it away.

Just do DDP vs khamzat as that is someone he hasn't fought. DO strickland vs whittaker.

Just scrap whitaker and khamzat and replace it with jiri vs hill or chandler vs colby

No...


Just no ..

If khamzat actually shows up and fights Whittaker and wins...then yes.

Outside of that...no...

U dont beat a short notice WW at MW by spilt decision and get a title shot ..


For God's sake man....no

 

[CasualBot]

Sure Khamzat doesn't deserve it and has done nothing at MW

 

[tritestill]

Was going to get into how stupid this is, but whatever.

 

[Leonard Haid]

Sure Khamzat doesn't deserve it and has done nothing at MW, but the ufc has set a precedence of giving unwarranted title shots (chito, stipe, rountreee, colby).

I really dont care to see ddp vs strickland because I have seen it. DDp probaly does even better in a rematch and puts it away.

Just do DDP vs khamzat as that is someone he hasn't fought. DO strickland vs whittaker.

Just scrap whitaker and khamzat and replace it with jiri vs hill or chandler vs colby

Ideally for me, DDP fights Strickland in South Africa, and Strickland trashes South Africa leading up to the fight.

 

[Tweak896]

I agree. Stylistically it'll be interesting to see DDP being the one pushed back. He's had guys willing to sit back and not pressure him. Khamzat isn't reliable but it's far more intriguing than a rematch which will look a little above sparring.

 

[Dr Fong]

It's impressive how well the Ultimate Rematch Championship has conditioned its marks into actively getting annoyed when someone suggests maybe not watching fights we've already seen.

 

[El Fernas]

Sure, he beats Whittaker first, you know, the fight he already has scheduled for UFC 308, i wouldnt mind him getting the next shot, in that case i wouldnt call it totally unwarranted, Whittaker is #3 at the moment.

It's impressive how well the Ultimate Rematch Championship has conditioned its marks into actively getting annoyed when someone suggests maybe not watching fights we've already seen.

Thats the side effect of the promotion centered MMA model, just a handful of guys available for any given fighter, specially at the top.

 

[RockyLockridge]

I only want to see it because i dont want khamzat to lose to anyone else first. I want dricus to be the one to stop him