- Joined
- Jul 2, 2007
- Messages
- 28,178
- Reaction score
- 14,952
The point is we have some evidence of Vitor beating good strikers at their own game. We have none for Igor. Arguing hypotheticals and counterfactuals doesn't change that.My point isn't that his victory over Wanderlei doesn't count, it's that it doesn't indicate he had the skill to beat Wanderlei if the blitz gambit failed. Which means it also doesn't show us he had the skill to beat Igor because I don't think anyone thinks Igor was going to get blitzed.
And you most definitely can't use wins from a decade later to say young Vitor could beat top strikers.