To piggyback off of what
@Ludwig von Mises said, you are evaluating Roger’s with the benefit of hindsight.
Here are
Sherdog’s rankings going into that fight. Brett Rogers was not only ranked, he was the highest ranked available Strikeforce heavyweight. There was nothing wrong with booking that fight with Fedor at all.
And I think it is a fair criticism of Stipe’s opponents to say most of them were well past their best when Stipe fought them. Rogers is a “can” that sparked Arlovksi in 2010, but Arlovski is supposed to be part of some fantastic win streak for Stipe in 2016? Likewise, the Overeem he fought was years removed from the 2010 version, JDS was years removed from the 2012 version, DC was almost 40 in their first fight (which DC won of course), and had already planned on retiring by their last but stuck around for the payday. These are just facts.
Stipe is a badass and I’m a fan, but these are just facts.
Rogers is and was a CAN. He had one ranked win with the other 9 being Journeyman Josh Thompson and 8 guys that were barely better than a Sherdogger. That elevates you to fighting the BEST in the World?
Again picking Arlovski out of Stipe's resume and arguing single points of time and single fights is an exercise in futility. For every SINGLE pro on either fighters resume there can be a con pointed out. Jumping around from point to point is insanity.
False Premise:
Stipe got KO'd by Struve. Fedor got KO'd by a MW Dan Henderson. Stipe was also poked in the eye right before the KO. Same with DC btw.
False Premise: Prime for a HW is in the 20's. HWs peak in their 30's with a combination of experience and athletic ability. Stipe's win over Francis is discounted because he was green but Fedor's win over a much greener CAN Brett Rogers is a solid win???
Stipe's wins over AA, Overeem, Werdum, JDS are discounted because of their elderly years (average 35 at the time). Mark Coleman is universally lauded as one of Fedor's top opponents. Do you know that he was 40 & 42 when he fought Fedor.
So which is it? 35 is way past PRIME or 42 is relevant?
All of these circular arguments are crazy and most are based off of incorrect facts or simply confirmation bias.
We can't compare their 20's as Fedor was in combat sports since his childhood and Stipe didn't start until his pro career until 28. Fedor did not fight top 5 Ranked HWs consecutively until Werdum, Bigfoot & Henderson (Not a HW) and what happened?
Excuse: Fedor was old and that was after his run. But he was 33 year old. At 33 Stipe fought HUNT, AA, Werdum, Overeem, JDS & Francis in a row and finished all of them by KO/TKO except for a 5 round domination of Frank.
Fedor has no such streak. At a true CHAMPIONSHIP level Fedor never fought true #1 contender one after the other after the other. I personally value that higher then a padded record.