How good was Fedor really? Was he truly elite?

I would point out nas well people talk like Hendo landed the H-bomb and KOed him which isnt what happened at all, int eh regular standup they actually exchanged good shots and it was Hendo who was rocked so I don't think that fight is any advert for a lack of chin or power, indeed Hendo himself said that was the hardest he'd ever been hit.

What it was an advert for is Fedor becoming slower, sloppier and like his other SF loses a worse grappler but even then I do think Herb Dean's role is highly questionable. Hendo's followup GnP is pretty clearly right to the back of the head, I mean Fedor could have leveled Dan with a soccer kick after the knockdown if rules don't matter.
 
Full stop he fought an 0-1 fighter when he was 17-1. His resume has been exposed over and over. He was a good fighter but not a god like some of these nut jobs think he was.

I don't think your opinion really carries any weight in this topic my friend. Clearly you don't understand what mma was like in those days, particularly in Japan.

If you did, then you wouldn't be bringing up 0-1 when he was 17-1 and comparing it to mma today and in the US
 
Overeem
DC
Barnett
Werdum
Mir
JDS
Cain


Fedor conveniently avoided some of the best fighters of his era. Medium fish in small pond.

He fought Werdum and Mir.

Barnett was signed to fight and a week prior Barnett popped for roids. How did Fedor avoid that?

Cain and JDS were in a different organizations.

DC was in SF for a brief period and they only could have been matched up in the GP, and would if Fedor beat Bigfoot

Overeem was a fight that was in talks a few times that didn't happen.

Wake up my friend, he avoided none of them. What you say make zero sense.
 
This is what it has come to, then. Wow. This has got to be a troll thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HHJ
Chael Sonnen said Fedor hit him harder than anyone has ever hit him. And this was near the end of his career when Fedor was much slower and beat up.

Fedor schooled CroCop in his prime.

And his specialty was grappling to begin with.
 
"Figures don't Lie but Liars can figure."
Kenny Florian

Fedor fought in a completely different era. Many of his opponents had glaring holes in their game. Schlit and Hunt were pure kickboxers for example. Royce Gracie was amazing when nobody else had BJJ. Title defenses? Defended Pride 3 times but fought 8 times. Defended WAMMA 2x but one was Brett Rogers!!!

Stipe and Fedor fought in completely different Eras and IMO what Fedor did was amazing. What he did Stipe may not have been able to do. Winning 16 in a row, a NC and then 11 in a row is hard to do. Maybe even head to head Fedor would beat Stipe. However Denis Hallman beat Matt Hughes twice. Did he have the better career?

Fedor never did what Stipe did. Fight top competition, fighting top competition CONSISTENTLY. Show me where Stipe is fighting cans? Fedor started judo and sambo as a child so his MMA transition was easy with Sambo being virtually MMA. Stipe was playing baseball at the age Fedor was already in combat sports. Fedor never fought consistenly against top level MMA fighters and when he did he lost. At age 34 Fedor lost to Werdum, Bigfoot and MW Dan Henderson. At the same age Stipe KO's Hunt, Arlovski, Werdum, Overeem & JDS in a row. Then beat Francis in a 5 round domination. Show me a streak in Fedor's resume that compares?
Yet as we’ve seen, Fedor fought good competition more often than Stipe did if you break their careers down year by year.

We’ve covered a lot of things, so I’m just going to bullet-point some thoughts here.

—There’s validity to saying they fought in diff eras, more specifically different MMA business models (JMMA vs UFC). So sure, it’s tough to find a 6 fight streak where Fedor wasn’t taking another fight in RINGS, Yarrenoka, Inoki-Bom-Ba-Ye, or fought someone not in the top 10. The flip side is that Stipe wasn’t fighting 4-5x a year, wasn’t fighting tournaments, wasn’t fighting multiple opponents in the same night, wasn’t fighting in 10-minute first rounds, and wasn’t fighting under a ruleset where soccer kicks, knees, and stomps to the head of a grounded opponent were legal.

—I think it’s telling that this win streak of Stipe’s you mentioned includes guys on Fedor’s resume. The 2016 version of Arlovski?? The 2015 version of Hunt? Even Overeem, who I’m a huge fan of, was nowhere near peak form in 2016. Even the 2017 version of JDS wasn’t so hot, but we know what happened when Stipe fought the 2014 version—he dropped 3 if not 4 of the 5 rounds to JDS in that fight.

—All that fight mileage of Fedor’s matters. In a diff post, I saw you talking about Fedor’s losses at age 33 vs Stipe’s wins at age 33. But Fedor started fighting in MMA when he was 23 or so; Stipe was 28. They were in very different places at age 33. Fedor’s losses were in his 34th, 35th, and 36th pro fights. We can’t look at Stipe’s, because after 14 years in MMA he still doesn’t have anywhere near that many fights. Fedor fought as many total fights as Stipe has fought, in the first 6 years of his career. I mean, that’s insane.

—I think there’s some bias in criticizing opponents like Schilt as having glaring holes in their game. Isn’t that true of Ngannou in the first Stipe fight? And yet, Stipe is praised for putting on a master class, you called it a “5 round domination”—but when Fedor does the same thing to Schilt, you criticize it.

—Your assessment of Stipe just playing baseball vs Fedor’s judo and sambo seems a bit dishonest. Stipe wasn’t an NCAA Div 1 wrestler? He didn’t train MMA, then switch to boxing, and box Golden Gloves before switching back to MMA to go pro? Of course he did.

—When comparing accolades, Stipe is fortunate that JMMA didn’t make every fight a title defense. At the very least, Coleman and Randleman would’ve been title defense worthy, and had they been Fedor would’ve had 7 total HW title defenses in one undefeated run, which would be way out of reach of most HWs. The 5 he has now in that run are a record that has never been matched or broken.

—I don’t think your Dennis Hallman analogy holds up here. Fedor is the one with more ranked wins, title wins, and title defenses. And that’s not even mentioning his RINGS and PRIDE tournament belts.

When we rank the best HWs of all time, Stipe is competing with Nog for the #2 spot. Neither are close to Fedor, who easily has the best HW resume of all time, and in fact has a resume so good that maybe only GSP or Jones are even in the conversation to have a better one.
 
At 33 years old Fedor had 35 fights and 11 years in the game.

At 33 Stipe had 15 fights and 6 years in the game.

Stipe got nuked by Stefan Struve when he was 30 years old and at his physical peak with 10 fights of experience. You think Fedor would have lost to Struve 10 fights into his career? Lol, no. Because Fedor was on a higher level than Stipe.

"FEDOR LOST TO A MW" 🤡

You criticize Fedor for losing to all time great Hendo and Bigfoot when Fedor was 6 years past his prime but Stipe getting knocked by Struve during his physical peak is 100x more embarassing and pathetic.

Classic noob post. It's no coincidence you rank Stipe above Fedor. Just admit you're UFC fanboy and we can end this debate.
At 33 Fedor had a padded record fighting cans. Look at Alex, Anderson, Izzy, gsp all have better records with better fighters than Fedor.

Look at Jones. I would even rank hendo above Fedor.
 
I think he was definitely a very smart fighter, good at maximising advantage with the skill set to do it but I do wonder if forced to face really elite skill without that how well would he do?

Achievement wise he's definitely towards the top of HW but I think because he was well suited to his era.
He had really bad fight iq and did not have the ability to adapt like Jones.

It was never exploited until he faced better fighters as most of his fights are freak fights against cans.

He jumped into werdums guard, he tried to slug it out against Hendo.

His fight iq was poor.
 
I don't think your opinion really carries any weight in this topic my friend. Clearly you don't understand what mma was like in those days, particularly in Japan.

If you did, then you wouldn't be bringing up 0-1 when he was 17-1 and comparing it to mma today and in the US

Think what you want, but I blaze ya’ll up with facts and you come with the same tired arguments, “zomg you just don’t know JMMA like me, I’m a pride dork and fedor is greatest regardless of your facts”. His resume has been exposed over and over again as a can crusher.
 
Stipe lost to every all time great HW he ever faced that was either at their peak or close to it. His win over DC was good but DC was 40 and retired immediately after. That's not someone who is peaking- so no- that's not a win over an all time great HW in their prime.

Guys like Glover and Jan became champions in their 40s because the division sucked at thet time and regressed badly. There's a reason for why Glover got melted by guys like Rumble and Gus and had nothing for Jones- it's because they were levels above him. Its no coincidence Jan was a prelims guy in those days. Then suddenly when all those guys were gone and Glover and Jan became champions in their 40s? You think this is because they were that good? No. It was because the division began to suck.

For that same reason Alex is so dominant at MW and LHW today. Both divisions have regressed badly. Alex wouldn't be able to string 3 consecutive wins in the Jon Jones - DC- Gus- Rumble era of LHW. This is why Alex barely beat or needed a gift decision over 41 year old Jan. Levels.

Same can be said about MW during the Weidman- Romero- Rockhold- Jacare- Mousasi- Silva- Hendo- Sonnen era. I'd be shocked to see Alex become champion in that era or even win 3 consecutive fights. I hope it's starting to make sense to you now. When you beat someone and the state of the division at the time matters more than who you beat.

Just like Poatan, Stipe fought in a weaker era of aged HWs. This is why he never beat an all time great HW at their peak and lost to every all time great HW he ever fought who were either peaking or close to their peak.

Lost to post Cain JDS the firs time by first round KO.
Lost to 40 year old DC the first time.
Lost to Ng once Ng hit his peak in devastating fashion.

These things matter when comparing legacies of all time great fighters.
OK
 
Think what you want, but I blaze ya’ll up with facts and you come with the same tired arguments, “zomg you just don’t know JMMA like me, I’m a pride dork and fedor is greatest regardless of your facts”. His resume has been exposed over and over again as a can crusher.

Context is everything my friend! Facts are useless if the context isn’t understood. Clearly with you it’s not.

His resume in Rings, Pride, Affliction and SF is phenomenal. There really isn’t anything to expose.
 
DC winning the UFC HW belt in 2018 was probably the best thing to happen to Fedor's legacy; a guy even smaller than Fedor as the top dog in the modern era.
 
Fedor provided entertainment in Pride

When he faced a 40 year old MW in Dan Henderson he was knocked out cold.

Imagine any HW getting knocked out by a MW in their 40s

Thats all you need to know.
 
Context is everything my friend! Facts are useless if the context isn’t understood. Clearly with you it’s not.

His resume in Rings, Pride, Affliction and SF is phenomenal. There really isn’t anything to expose.
Again, resume is great for fighting fake pro wrasslers, taxi drivers, 0-1, 0-3. 1-2, 1-3, etc. it’s not something to understand or not, it’s pretty black and white. He has a lot of wins but some of those wins came against absolute nobodies and washed fighters. He got pounded when he stepped up. Come again sir!
 
Back
Top