• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social How do we sleep while our beds are burning? The climate changing thread

Is CO2 air pollution?

gatchaman, I see you are trying to live up to your name but I asked you why you are asking me this question and your response is to ask me the same question again. I do appreciate you trying to use this argument to make my simple statement more complex. Kudos to you, but it's a simple statement. There's no need to get that deep with it.
 
There isn't a real solution to this problem without a giant reduction in birthrate and quality of life.
 
Your opening argument on whether CO2 is air pollution is to insult me, and I am entirely unconvinced.
What should the CO2 level in the air be in ppm?

Throughout human history up until the Industrial Revolution, atmospheric CO2 ranged from 180 ppm - 300 ppm. Since this is the modern concentration absent human intervention, this is a good baseline. Any changes above or below should happen at a rate of about 0.001 to 0.01 ppm per year. Absent human intervention, this is the rate at which it changes historically. So, again, this is a good baseline.

Atmospheric CO2 currently sits around 420 ppm. We've increased it by 110 ppm just in the last 75 years. It's currently increasing at a rate of 2.5 - 3 ppm per year, and that rate of change continues to accelerate. That's 300x - 3000x faster than any time period we know of (including during extinction level events), and increasing.

And yes, CO2 absolutely can be classified as air pollution, because excess amounts of it can have serious detrimental consequences for ecosystems on Earth.

Now please post your spiel about how CO2 was much higher a hundred million years ago when dinosaurs roamed the Earth so I can continue demolishing you on this topic.
 
gatchaman, I see you are trying to live up to your name but I asked you why you are asking me this question and your response is to ask me the same question again. I do appreciate you trying to use this argument to make my simple statement more complex. Kudos to you, but it's a simple statement. There's no need to get that deep with it.
I am quoting William Osler: “As is our pathology, so is our practice.”

The idea here is that you have to correctly identify the underlying cause for your treatment to be effective.

If you go to the doctor complaining of depression and he diagnoses you with diabetic foot and amputates your leg then do you see how not following Osler's advice makes the patient worse off?

Now keeping in mind Osler's advice, answer the question:
Is CO2 air pollution?
 
It’s a shame the very dumbest people who keep denying climate change can’t just be sent to go fight these fires. With the very best super soakers
 
Temperatures have always changed, we've had the ice age and I think scientists said at one time the Amazon area was even hotter then it is now.

The Sahara desert was green at one time.
All true , there was also just one supercontinent at point .

None of these facts have anything to do with this thread .
 
All true , there was also just one supercontinent at point .

None of these facts have anything to do with this thread .

The other thing people with this line of thought are missing is that in general the climate doesn't drastically shift "naturally". The major shifts were the result of a single or series of catastrophic events. And when it was "hotter in the past" current humans would literally boil, so we don't want it to get hotter. The periods when it was hotter or colder, humans or anything like it did not exist at all.

Volcanic activity played a major part of historical temperature fluctuations, emitting massive waves of greenhouse gases.

Human industrial civilization is the most recent catastrophic event.
 
Global warming is not real. It snowed at my house.
And if it is real, its natural.
And if its not natural, we didn't cause it.
And if we did cause it, its a good thing.
And if its not a good thing then at least it triggers the libs.
 
Call it what you will but too much co2 in the atmosphere is not good .
This statement, while true, does not provide any useful information. Yes at 100% CO2 in the air, all humans die. All humans also die at 0% CO2 in the air after plants die.

This is why I ask you to provide your numbers; here are mine: Everyone is freaking about an increase of 200 ppm CO2 to 400 ppm CO2, ignoring that the normal state of affairs for the planet is over 1000 ppm (and life persists even above 4000 ppm). Similarly, you ignore that the normal state of affairs for the planet is hot house, but you are currently living in an ice age (ice at the poles), an interglacial of an ice age, but an ice age nonetheless. Here are my numbers:

Dangerously low: Below 200 ppm (Plant life dies below 150 ppm, and humans become extinct.)

Optimum CO2 for the human race: 800-1600 ppm (CO2 is pumped into green houses to maintain this level for optimum plant growth. This is the minimum optimum level because it costs money to pump CO2.)

Still okay: CO2 1600-6000 ppm (Plant growth will be similar at this level to the 800-1600 ppm level.)

Less okay: 6000-10G ppm (Plant growth less than 800-6000 ppm but still good)

Not okay: Over 10G ppm (People can still operate nuclear submarines at this level, but they are uncomfortable, and I can see some people with end stage emphysema might die here who might otherwise have lived, like Stephanie Warriner, who was homicided for not wearing a mask in the hospital because she was uncomfortable rebreathing her CO2.)

Notice, I'm not concerned at all about the temperature, because even at today's levels, we are still in an ice age, and even if the worst fears of climate alarmists were realized, "No ice at the poles!", this would just represent the more normal state of affairs for the planet, hot house, also known as climate optimums based on expansion of the fossil record under these conditions.

Now, that I have provided my numbers, people will attack them, while providing no numbers of their own, just like in the Epstein thread were I have identified the problem and the solution:
Problem: Neither Dems nor Repubs will release Epstein information because Epstein's network rules you.
Solution: Organize a write-in vote for a viral candidate, who is neither Dem nor Repub, but who is definitely anti-Epstein.

What will you choose: Insult me or take a stab at identifying problems and solutions?
Let's take a baby step: Is 400 ppm CO2 too high or suboptimal? John Kerry says too high:
 
Last edited:
What are these " actual environmental issues" ?
I think the Epstein network is a bigger environmental issue than ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles.

You are ruled by the Epstein network. Maybe you think this a good thing, but I think we are being run by the Epstein network the way that Joe Pesci ran the restaurant in Goodfellas.


The world's problem is that we are heading to an economic depression (the restaurant being burned down in the above clip). Epstein's network has diagnosed (to continue my analogy from post #44) global warming (diabetic foot) with the solution of massive wealth transfer from the tax payer to the mob (leg amputation) to fund things like electric buses and Solyndra (which is really just putting the money in the pockets of the mob. You should look up Solyndra if you don't know what it is.). In Edmonton, half the electric buses don't work, and the company that is supposed to service them is bankrupt, and the buses that do work can be driven for half a day compared to a full day for ICE buses. The scam is being repeated in Calgary.

Here is the Epstein network climate scam laid bare:
headlines.jpg

1999 GISS analysis of surface temperature change (Figure 6): https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_ha03200f.pdf

1924 MacMillan Reports signs of New Ice Age: https://www.nytimes.com/1924/09/28/...s-of-new-ice-age-explorer-brings-word-of.html

1932 Next Great Deluge Forecast by Science: http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/weekinreview/warm1930.pdf

1978 International Team of Specialists Finds No End in Sight to 30-year Cooling Trend in Northern Hemisphere: https://www.nytimes.com/1978/01/05/...cialists-finds-no-end-in-sight-to-30year.html

1988 Global Warming Has Begun, Expert Tells Senate: https://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/24/us/global-warming-has-begun-expert-tells-senate.html

The fraudsters who rule us convinced you that a normal trend in the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (You should look up the AMO if you don't know what it is.) is the "Next Great Deluge" (to quote the headline from 1932), and you fell for it just like low information people, who didn't know about solar eclipses, fell for it from Thales of Miletus and Christopher Columbus.

Now that you know that your entire global order is Solyndra/Goodfellas writ large, let's revisit the question:
Which is an actual environmental issue?:
A) ICE vehicles
B) Epstein's network
Don't be a chicken, answer the question.
 

Thousands evacuated in Spain as deadly heatwave fans Mediterranean wildfires​

Boy, four, dies of heatstroke in Rome as scientists say high temperatures and fires are reminder of climate emergency

Sam Jones in Madrid and Helena Smith in Athens

The deadly heatwave fanning wildfires across the Mediterranean region has claimed at least three lives and forced thousands of people from their homes.

Firefighters continued to battle blazes on Tuesday and authorities braced for further damage as temperatures in some areas surged well past 40C. In Spain, a Romanian man in his 50s died after suffering 98% burns while trying to rescue horses from a burning stable near Madrid on Monday night.

A four-year-old boy who was found unconscious in his family’s car in Sardinia died in Rome on Monday after suffering irreversible brain damage caused by heatstroke. And in Montenegro, one soldier died and another was seriously injured when their water tanker overturned while fighting wildfires in the hills north of the capital, Podgorica, on Tuesday.

Scientist have warned that the heat currently affecting large parts of Europe is creating perfect conditions for wildfires and serving as another reminder of the climate emergency.
“Thanks to climate change, we now live in a significantly warmer world,” Akshay Deoras, a research scientist at the University of Reading’s meteorology department told Agence France-Presse, adding that “many still underestimate the danger”.

The fire in Tres Cantos, near Madrid – which had been fuelled by winds of 70km/h (45mph) and which has devoured 1,000 hectares of land – was still not under control on Tuesday evening, when further strong gusts were expected. The regional government said it had recovered 150 dead sheep and 18 dead horses from the area.

More than 3,700 people were evacuated from 16 municipalities amid dozens of reported blazes in the north-western region of Castilla y León, including one that damaged the Unesco world heritage-listed Roman-era mining site at Les Médulas.

Authorities in neighbouring Galicia said the largest wildfire of the year had burned through 3,000 hectares of land in Ourense province. In the southern town of Tarifa, firefighters on the ground and in planes battled a fire that broke out on Monday, with 2,000 people evacuated.

The blazes have led the interior ministry to declare a “pre-emergency phase” to help coordinate emergency resources.
The prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, offered his condolences to the family of the man who died after the Tres Cantos fire, and thanked the emergency services for their “tireless efforts”.

He urged people to recognise the seriousness of the situation. “We’re at extreme risk of forest fires,” he said in a message on X on Tuesday. “Let’s be very careful.”

In neighbouring Portugal, firefighters were battling three large wildfires in the centre and north of the country.

Authorities in Greece requested EU help as fires, fuelled by gale force winds, ripped across vast swathes of the western Peloponnese and emergency services ordered the evacuation of thousands of residents.

Firefighters were also trying to contain blazes on the popular Ionian tourist islands of Zakynthos and Kefalonia. With gusts hampering firefighting efforts, emergency services ordered all hotels in the region of Agala and Keri on Zakynthos to temporarily close, forcing suitcase-wielding holidaymakers to flee and relocate to other areas.
41324a5fbc0202e81cd1bae34068602b.jpg

By late Tuesday, dozens of firefighters, supported by 15 fire trucks and eight water-bombing planes and helicopters, were still trying to douse the fast-moving flames.

“Everything that civil protection can offer is here but there are very strong winds and the fires are out of control,” said the island’s mayor, Giorgos Stasinopoulos. “We need a lot more air support, it’s vital.”

The fire service said it was also dealing with blazes farther north in Epirus, around Preveza and in the central region of Aetolia-Acarnania.

Despite temperatures nudging 43C in some parts of the Peloponnese region of southern Greece on Tuesday – and the prolonged drought, which has produced highly flammable conditions on tinder-dry soil – officials described the outbreak of so many fires as “suspiciously high”.

Faced with an estimated 63 blazes erupting and firefighters confronting flames on 106 fronts, fire officers dispatched specialist teams to several of the stricken regions to investigate possible arson.

In Albania, hundreds of firefighters and troops had subdued most of the nearly 40 fires that flared up in the past 24 hours, the defence ministry said, but more than a dozen were still active.
maxresdefault.jpg

Since the start of July, nearly 34,000 hectares have been scorched nationwide, according to the European Forest Fire Information System. Police say many of the blazes were deliberate, with more than 20 people arrested.

In Croatia, about 150 firefighters spent Monday night defending homes near the port city of Split.

In the north-western Turkish province of Çanakkale, more than 2,000 people were evacuated and 77 people treated in hospital for smoke inhalation after fires broke out near the tourist village of Güzelyalı, authorities said.

Images on Turkish media showed homes and cars ablaze, while more than 760 firefighters, 10 planes, nine helicopters and more than 200 vehicles were deployed to battle the flames. Turkey this year experienced its hottest July since records began 55 years ago.

In southern France, where temperature records were broken in at least four weather stations, the government called for vigilance.

The south-western city of Bordeaux hit a record 41.6C on Monday, while all-time records were broken at meteorological stations in Bergerac, Cognac and Saint Girons, according to the national weather service, Météo France.
5472.jpg

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-spain-amid-deadly-wildfires-and-new-heatwave

Hespect for the Midnight Oil reference

 
<Dany07>


Alright then, let's dig in!

Everyone is freaking about an increase of 200 ppm CO2 to 400 ppm CO2, ignoring that the normal state of affairs for the planet is over 1000 ppm (and life persists even above 4000 ppm).

What life persists above 4000 ppm? The last time levels were that high was over 400 million years ago, when there was a comparatively tiny amount of diversity of life, and almost all of it was in the ocean apart from some extremely primitive terrestrial plants.

What percentage of species alive today were alive the last time CO2 was 1000 ppm? That was over 50 million years ago. Average global temperature was about 24 degrees Fahrenheit higher than what it is today. Sea levels were also 230 feet higher.

Optimum CO2 for the human race: 800-1600 ppm (CO2 is pumped into green houses to maintain this level for optimum plant growth. This is the minimum optimum level because it costs money to pump CO2.)

Human beings have never lived through global CO2 levels higher than what they are now (420~ ppm). To say that 800-1600 is "optimum" is baseless. Especially since you, admittedly, are ignoring every single other factor associated with those levels.

Still okay: CO2 1600-6000 ppm (Plant growth will be similar at this level to the 800-1600 ppm.)

6000 ppm is okay? For fucking what? The last time it was that high there was almost no life on land whatsoever, and certainly no complex life.

Notice, I'm not concerned at all about the temperature

There's a lot you're not concerned about, which is borne out in the rest of your post. All you have done is look at what levels of atmospheric CO2 plants can survive at (of course you're not accounting for anything else, so even that is a moot point), and used that to come up with a thesis for what global levels of atmospheric CO2 is "okay".

It takes tens, or hundreds of thousands of years or more for species to adapt to the kind of changes you're talking about. We're doing it in decades. You're acting like the argument is about whether the planet itself will be able to support some form of life. The actual argument is about preserving the life we have now.
 
<Dany07>


Alright then, let's dig in!



What life persists above 4000 ppm? The last time levels were that high was over 400 million years ago, when there was a comparatively tiny amount of diversity of life, and almost all of it was in the ocean apart from some extremely primitive terrestrial plants.

What percentage of species alive today were alive the last time CO2 was 1000 ppm? That was over 50 million years ago. Average global temperature was about 24 degrees Fahrenheit higher than what it is today. Sea levels were also 230 feet higher.



Human beings have never lived through global CO2 levels higher than what they are now (420~ ppm). To say that 800-1600 is "optimum" is baseless. Especially since you, admittedly, are ignoring every single other factor associated with those levels.



6000 ppm is okay? For fucking what? The last time it was that high there was almost no life on land whatsoever, and certainly no complex life.



There's a lot you're not concerned about, which is borne out in the rest of your post. All you have done is look at what levels of atmospheric CO2 plants can survive at (of course you're not accounting for anything else, so even that is a moot point), and used that to come up with a thesis for what global levels of atmospheric CO2 is "okay".

It takes tens, or hundreds of thousands of years or more for species to adapt to the kind of changes you're talking about. We're doing it in decades. You're acting like the argument is about whether the planet itself will be able to support some form of life. The actual argument is about preserving the life we have now.
I told you that you would attack me while providing no numbers of your own for safe levels of CO2, and here we are (You even included a laughing emoji like you really burned me).
What was the CO2 50-60 MYA (fifty to sixty million years ago) according to you?
 
Last edited:

Thousands evacuated in Spain as deadly heatwave fans Mediterranean wildfires​

Boy, four, dies of heatstroke in Rome as scientists say high temperatures and fires are reminder of climate emergency

Sam Jones in Madrid and Helena Smith in Athens

The deadly heatwave fanning wildfires across the Mediterranean region has claimed at least three lives and forced thousands of people from their homes.

Firefighters continued to battle blazes on Tuesday and authorities braced for further damage as temperatures in some areas surged well past 40C. In Spain, a Romanian man in his 50s died after suffering 98% burns while trying to rescue horses from a burning stable near Madrid on Monday night.

A four-year-old boy who was found unconscious in his family’s car in Sardinia died in Rome on Monday after suffering irreversible brain damage caused by heatstroke. And in Montenegro, one soldier died and another was seriously injured when their water tanker overturned while fighting wildfires in the hills north of the capital, Podgorica, on Tuesday.

Scientist have warned that the heat currently affecting large parts of Europe is creating perfect conditions for wildfires and serving as another reminder of the climate emergency.
“Thanks to climate change, we now live in a significantly warmer world,” Akshay Deoras, a research scientist at the University of Reading’s meteorology department told Agence France-Presse, adding that “many still underestimate the danger”.

The fire in Tres Cantos, near Madrid – which had been fuelled by winds of 70km/h (45mph) and which has devoured 1,000 hectares of land – was still not under control on Tuesday evening, when further strong gusts were expected. The regional government said it had recovered 150 dead sheep and 18 dead horses from the area.

More than 3,700 people were evacuated from 16 municipalities amid dozens of reported blazes in the north-western region of Castilla y León, including one that damaged the Unesco world heritage-listed Roman-era mining site at Les Médulas.

Authorities in neighbouring Galicia said the largest wildfire of the year had burned through 3,000 hectares of land in Ourense province. In the southern town of Tarifa, firefighters on the ground and in planes battled a fire that broke out on Monday, with 2,000 people evacuated.

The blazes have led the interior ministry to declare a “pre-emergency phase” to help coordinate emergency resources.
The prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, offered his condolences to the family of the man who died after the Tres Cantos fire, and thanked the emergency services for their “tireless efforts”.

He urged people to recognise the seriousness of the situation. “We’re at extreme risk of forest fires,” he said in a message on X on Tuesday. “Let’s be very careful.”

In neighbouring Portugal, firefighters were battling three large wildfires in the centre and north of the country.

Authorities in Greece requested EU help as fires, fuelled by gale force winds, ripped across vast swathes of the western Peloponnese and emergency services ordered the evacuation of thousands of residents.

Firefighters were also trying to contain blazes on the popular Ionian tourist islands of Zakynthos and Kefalonia. With gusts hampering firefighting efforts, emergency services ordered all hotels in the region of Agala and Keri on Zakynthos to temporarily close, forcing suitcase-wielding holidaymakers to flee and relocate to other areas.
41324a5fbc0202e81cd1bae34068602b.jpg

By late Tuesday, dozens of firefighters, supported by 15 fire trucks and eight water-bombing planes and helicopters, were still trying to douse the fast-moving flames.

“Everything that civil protection can offer is here but there are very strong winds and the fires are out of control,” said the island’s mayor, Giorgos Stasinopoulos. “We need a lot more air support, it’s vital.”

The fire service said it was also dealing with blazes farther north in Epirus, around Preveza and in the central region of Aetolia-Acarnania.

Despite temperatures nudging 43C in some parts of the Peloponnese region of southern Greece on Tuesday – and the prolonged drought, which has produced highly flammable conditions on tinder-dry soil – officials described the outbreak of so many fires as “suspiciously high”.

Faced with an estimated 63 blazes erupting and firefighters confronting flames on 106 fronts, fire officers dispatched specialist teams to several of the stricken regions to investigate possible arson.

In Albania, hundreds of firefighters and troops had subdued most of the nearly 40 fires that flared up in the past 24 hours, the defence ministry said, but more than a dozen were still active.
maxresdefault.jpg

Since the start of July, nearly 34,000 hectares have been scorched nationwide, according to the European Forest Fire Information System. Police say many of the blazes were deliberate, with more than 20 people arrested.

In Croatia, about 150 firefighters spent Monday night defending homes near the port city of Split.

In the north-western Turkish province of Çanakkale, more than 2,000 people were evacuated and 77 people treated in hospital for smoke inhalation after fires broke out near the tourist village of Güzelyalı, authorities said.

Images on Turkish media showed homes and cars ablaze, while more than 760 firefighters, 10 planes, nine helicopters and more than 200 vehicles were deployed to battle the flames. Turkey this year experienced its hottest July since records began 55 years ago.

In southern France, where temperature records were broken in at least four weather stations, the government called for vigilance.

The south-western city of Bordeaux hit a record 41.6C on Monday, while all-time records were broken at meteorological stations in Bergerac, Cognac and Saint Girons, according to the national weather service, Météo France.
5472.jpg

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-spain-amid-deadly-wildfires-and-new-heatwave



 
This statement, while true, does not provide any useful information. Yes at 100% CO2 in the air, all humans die. All humans also die at 0% CO2 in the air after plants die.

This is why I ask you to provide your numbers; here are mine: Everyone is freaking about an increase of 200 ppm CO2 to 400 ppm CO2, ignoring that the normal state of affairs for the planet is over 1000 ppm (and life persists even above 4000 ppm). Similarly, you ignore that the normal state of affairs for the planet is hot house, but you are currently living in an ice age (ice at the poles), an interglacial of an ice age, but an ice age nonetheless. Here are my numbers:

Dangerously low: Below 200 ppm (Plant life dies below 150 ppm, and humans become extinct.)

Optimum CO2 for the human race: 800-1600 ppm (CO2 is pumped into green houses to maintain this level for optimum plant growth. This is the minimum optimum level because it costs money to pump CO2.)

Still okay: CO2 1600-6000 ppm (Plant growth will be similar at this level to the 800-1600 ppm level.)

Less okay: 6000-10G ppm (Plant growth less than 800-6000 ppm but still good)

Not okay: Over 10G ppm (People can still operate nuclear submarines at this level, but they are uncomfortable, and I can see some people with end stage emphysema might die here who might otherwise have lived, like Stephanie Warriner, who was homicided for not wearing a mask in the hospital because she was uncomfortable rebreathing her CO2.)

Notice, I'm not concerned at all about the temperature, because even at today's levels, we are still in an ice age, and even if the worst fears of climate alarmists were realized, "No ice at the poles!", this would just represent the more normal state of affairs for the planet, hot house, also known as climate optimums based on expansion of the fossil record under these conditions.

Now, that I have provided my numbers, people will attack them, while providing no numbers of their own, just like in the Epstein thread were I have identified the problem and the solution:
Problem: Neither Dems nor Repubs will release Epstein information because Epstein's network rules you.
Solution: Organize a write-in vote for a viral candidate, who is neither Dem nor Repub, but who is definitely anti-Epstein.

What will you choose: Insult me or take a stab at identifying problems and solutions?
Let's take a baby step: Is 400 ppm CO2 too high or suboptimal? John Kerry says too high:


Are you fucking insane LOL!!

https://www.co2meter.com/en-ca/blogs/news/carbon-dioxide-indoor-levels-chart


400 ppm

0.04%

Normal outdoor air

400-1,000 ppm

0.04-0.1%

Typical CO2 levels found indoors

1,000-2,000 ppm

0.1-0.2%

Common complaints of drowsiness or poor air quality

2,000-5,000 ppm

0.2-0.5%

Headaches, fatigue, stagnant, stuffiness, poor concentration, loss of focus, increased heart rate, nausea

Pre-Industrial CO2 was around 280 ppm, today we're at 420 ppm. I've seen 350 as an upper limit to preserve a planet to which civilization developed and thrived.

https://mn350.org/understanding350/
 
Are you fucking insane LOL!!

https://www.co2meter.com/en-ca/blogs/news/carbon-dioxide-indoor-levels-chart


400 ppm

0.04%

Normal outdoor air

400-1,000 ppm

0.04-0.1%

Typical CO2 levels found indoors

1,000-2,000 ppm

0.1-0.2%

Common complaints of drowsiness or poor air quality

2,000-5,000 ppm

0.2-0.5%

Headaches, fatigue, stagnant, stuffiness, poor concentration, loss of focus, increased heart rate, nausea

Pre-Industrial CO2 was around 280 ppm, today we're at 420 ppm. I've seen 350 as an upper limit to preserve a planet to which civilization developed and thrived.

https://mn350.org/understanding350/
You forgot to include the CO2 level in a nuclear submarine (10G ppm or higher), and the submariners are still able to operate the submarine at this level.
 
I told you that you would attack me while providing no numbers of your own for safe levels of CO2, and here we are (You even included a laughing emoji like you really burned me).
What was the CO2 50-60 MYA (fifty to sixty million years ago) according to you?
I'm expanding on my answer because you have not answered yet @heloder.

For one thing, I'm glad that you agree that the CO2 level has been over 4000 ppm in the past in the hundreds of the millions of years ago (when there were no humans and no internal combustion engine). So we agree that the increase of 200 to 400 ppm (that is falsely attributed to the Industrial Age. Okay, we don't agree on "falsely", and I will expand on why I say falsely if someone asks.) is insignificant compared to the natural variation that occurs without humans. You are being dishonest about diversity of lifeforms: I stated that high temperature and CO2 periods are "known as Climate Optimums based on expansion of the fossil record under these conditions.", which includes the Cambrian Explosion of Life (around 500-600 MYA), in which the temperature and CO2 were as high as they have ever been since, while you have cherry-picked the Devonian Extinction, which also includes all-time lows in CO2 and temperature. Please describe the climate of a Climate Optimum according to the geologic record.

The reason that I am focused on 50-60 MYA is because we are agreed that the CO2 was over a thousand ppm and the temperature was high enough for there to be crocodiles and palm trees in the arctic (from fossil evidence dated to the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum or PETM). There were also primates. So at a time, when CO2 was "dangerously high" (above 350 ppm according to John Kerry) and the temperature was orders of magnitude higher than today's ice age, primates survived.

Your argument is that humans will go extinct above 420 ppm because they have never existed above this level. So buckle up; you are going extinct from global warming (during an ice age), because the CO2 is already almost at that level, and there is nothing you can do about it. Billions of dollars have been spent and numerous international accords have been signed, and you haven't moved the CO2 ppm trendline even 1 ppm. Go look for yourself: https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/d...-carbon-dioxide-levels-surge-faster-than-ever

I mentioned earlier that we are living in the interglacial of an Ice Age, based on the Milankovich Cycle (You should look this up if you don't know what it means.) that goes back about a 1M years in ice cores. Here is the last half a million years from the Vostok ice core:
6.jpg

All of human civilization exists in that last ellipse without a box around it. So, most of the time we are in glacial, and for 10-20 thousand years out of 100 thousand years we get a brief relief. We are at the end of the present interglacial (our ellipse is the same size as the preceding ellipses), so sometime between tomorrow and a few thousand years from now, we are going to be back in a glacial. And what does a glacial look like?: In the last glacial all of Canada was covered by the Laurentide Ice Sheet. This change about 10,000+ years ago is the reason that people can live in Canada:
loopglac.gif

Similarly, there was a Weischelian Ice Sheet in Europe:
Weichsel-W%C3%BCrm-Glaciation.png

So if I could press a button to create your doomsday scenario of PETM-like conditions (palm trees and crocodiles in Canada) at 1000ppm CO2 or more, I would push it.

What is your choice?:
A) PETM-like conditions (What you are afraid of)
B) Laurentide and Weischelian Ice Sheets (What is actually going to happen)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top