I think the Epstein network is a bigger environmental issue than ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles.
You are ruled by the Epstein network. Maybe you think this a good thing, but I think we are being run by the Epstein network the way that Joe Pesci ran the restaurant in Goodfellas.
The world's problem is that we are heading to an economic depression (the restaurant being burned down in the above clip). Epstein's network has diagnosed (to continue my analogy from post #44) global warming (diabetic foot) with the solution of massive wealth transfer from the tax payer to the mob (leg amputation) to fund things like electric buses and Solyndra (which is really just putting the money in the pockets of the mob. You should look up Solyndra if you don't know what it is.). In Edmonton, half the electric buses don't work, and the company that is supposed to service them is bankrupt, and the buses that do work can be driven for half a day compared to a full day for ICE buses. The scam is being repeated in Calgary.
Here is the Epstein network climate scam laid bare:
The fraudsters who rule us convinced you that a normal trend in the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (You should look up the AMO if you don't know what it is.) is the "Next Great Deluge" (to quote the headline from 1932), and you fell for it just like low information people, who didn't know about solar eclipses, fell for it from Thales of Miletus and Christopher Columbus.
Now that you know that your entire global order is Solyndra/Goodfellas writ large, let's revisit the question:
Which is an actual environmental issue?:
A) ICE vehicles
B) Epstein's network
Don't be a chicken, answer the question.
Walls if text , I'm sure you have all this saved somewhere...
Don't be a chicken? This made think of A Christmas Story and the BB gun , Odd guy you are .
You are all over the place , weird tangents I'm sure you think come together
Yes I remember solyndra , I remember in 2007 they were used by the right to try and undermine the backing of "green companies" I remember Mitt Romney railing against the money wasted on supporting companies like solyndra and Tesla all the while being backing the subsidizing of oil gas companies , it's always hit my funny bone that one of his examples of waste thrived and survived completely undermining his position.
Yes green houses pump in co2 because co2 is how plants build their structures , this proves nothing except that plants can be used to sequester carbon which it what fossil fuels are .
Yes humans can survive higher co2 levels and the planet can obviously thrive with much higher co2 levels but significantly higher levels will be catastrophic for our modern society, I've been saying for twenty years , we aren't ruining the planet, we're ruining it for us .
Humans have thrived in the last ten thousand years fron a warmer , wetter , relatively stable climate, it's why plant cultivation developed around the same time in different places all around the world ,it's quite fascinating , so why risk a higher climate when we can prevent it if we have the will ?
A warming planet will bring chaos in the form of unpredictable and violent weather patterns , have you not noticed the heat waves and fires that rage like never before and keep getting worse year after year ?
I love it when people like bring up articles from sources like popular science published 60 years ago predicting an ice age and try and use it to discredit climate science, you know then they are either dishonest, dumb or batshit , that's how science should work ,different people have different theories, they argue them , publish studies , meet up and present them , the strongest theories stand up to scrutiny and win the day , the ones that don't, well they don't go away, there are always wingnuts , in a fashion shouting on the corner, sound familiar?
Showing an article from 1930 , Really?
The world is moving to renewables because they are cheaper and cleaner , this can't be stopped, there are alot of very rich and powerful companies trying to slow this down (they've given up trying to stop it ) because this will undo their strangle hold on energy supply and distribution, they are pushing nuclear now in hopes of keeping as much control as they can , control the supply , control the distribution, control the cost .
The world is moving to EVs because they are simpler and more reliable as well as being cleaner and will be cheaper, they already are in China and are at cost parity in Europe and Australia, this transition too cannot be stopped .
No vast global conspiracy needed , it's just progress.
In summary it appears you have it completely backwards , the powers that be ( billionaires and mega corporations and the politicians they buy) are trying to keep the status quo not over turn it , why would they ?, the status quo is how they got their power and money in the first place, why on earth would they fuck with it ?
One thing can't be argued , the rich and powerful are the ones who would be the least affected by climate change, they might even benefit from it .
