- Joined
- Jan 20, 2014
- Messages
- 39,921
- Reaction score
- 19,804
It's not just housing, it's the cost of maintaining and operation of the housing. Not to mention that these people need a tremendous amount of hand holding and access to other resources which means they will need to be housed in areas in which will be near actual property owners and thus lowering their value. Personally I just accept that the vast majority of homeless are just defective and will never contribute more than they cost. They don't provide a significant ROI
Then again, if the government wants to offload public land to developers to build low incomes homes, then that could work... But again, these people need a large network of hand holders which means they will always be placed in city scapes and not just be build up in skme ouccipied land in the middle of nowhere.
Maybe a solution can be given to the capable homeless who don't need all the resources the "baby bird" segment of the homeless would need
Then again, if the government wants to offload public land to developers to build low incomes homes, then that could work... But again, these people need a large network of hand holders which means they will always be placed in city scapes and not just be build up in skme ouccipied land in the middle of nowhere.
Maybe a solution can be given to the capable homeless who don't need all the resources the "baby bird" segment of the homeless would need
Last edited: