Elections Hillary v. Trump Presidential Debate Three

Who won the third Presidential debate?

  • Total voters
    287
  • Poll closed .
sodapopinski said:
EQUILIBRIUM
HIN4jH.jpg
Click to expand...

I liked that movie. *hides puppy in trunk*
 
HeLLMuTT said:
You sound butthurt over nothing.

Been doing it the whole time I've been here bub. Try harder... I'd say try smarter too but I know that's never gunna happen. You don't even check to see if what you are saying is even true.
That makes you look GREAT!

How do you like that?
post-38592-fear-and-loathing-dickbutt-gif-ilEY.gif
Click to expand...
What?
 
ncordless said:
Can I walk down the street of Melbourne with my modified AK-47 with a drum clip strapped to my back?
Click to expand...

Hah! No.
...but usually when people say an outright gun ban, they mean an outright ban on guns.
 
TreeOfWoe said:
There's a mountain of evidence that the DNC rigged the primary and is rigging the presidential election through the corporate mainstream media, through paid provocateurs, and through systemic corruption. It is as rigged an election as in a banana republic.

At this point you have to be deliberately ignoring said evidence to deny that it is rigged.
Click to expand...
BULLSHIT!!!
 
ncordless said:
Moved on to the debate while spendin time with the childrens. If I get up to posting deep, I will address it.

Pretty simple. Any costs associated with the charity are not "spent on the people" or however she put it. So, if you have an office, or an employee. Or use electricity, or mail, or the internet. That money is not "spent on the people." Good charities will tend to have lower percentage operating costs and higher percentage of charitable giving in their budgets. At least 65% for giving is considered good.
Click to expand...

So deep you're in quicksand and sinking. :cool:

Imagine you're a lawyer and someone was paying you to find anything misleading (to the uninformed) about that quote. Could you?
 
I thought Hillary won by the end of the night. I hate Trump but I thought his first thirty minutes or so were okay if not totally pandering and filled with mistruths. He went off the rails there though and showed how easily upset he is. He continues to come off like a child next to Hillary. Either way I don't think this debate will swing much one way or the other.
 
Trotsky said:
So, he's definitely said "bigly" at certain points. And now it seems like he's purposefully saying "big league" a lot and enunciating, like a guy who gets caught picking his nose and then keeps visibly pretending to scratch it to pass off the earlier gold digging.

Also, I'm a big fan of "bigly" and I say it quite often now.
Click to expand...

Apparently, it is a real word... so what is the issue exactly?

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigly

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...dential-debate-us-election-2016-a7370861.html
 
Cubo de Sangre said:
The one central to my post you initially responded to.
Click to expand...
"We at the Clinton Foundation spent 90%...90% of all the money that is donated on behalf of program of people around the world and our own country. I'm very proud of that."

It's basically gibberish the way she stated it. I assume she meant that 90% of the Clinton Foundation's budget is spent on programming as opposed to operations. I don't know whether that is true or not. It's a pretty high number for a charity.

As to whether it is misleading to the uninformed? Sure, as a lawyer I could argue that. As a lawyer, I could make arguments for just about anything, and as far as difficult arguments go, arguing that uninformed people may be mislead by something is a pretty easy one.
 
QuitYourCrying said:
Apparently, it is a real word... so what is the issue exactly?

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigly

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...dential-debate-us-election-2016-a7370861.html
Click to expand...
Even if he's aware it's a word he isn't using it correctly

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/dictionary-expert-bigly-is-actually-933072

“The whole thing is pretty funny,” she says. “I mean, whether he means big league or bigly doesn’t really matter — he’s not using an established use of either of those words in either case. A presidential debate is pretty formal and I’d think you’d want to use language that is widely understood by most of the people listening to you. But Trump doesn’t seem to do that.
 
ncordless said:
"We at the Clinton Foundation spent 90%...90% of all the money that is donated on behalf of program of people around the world and our own country. I'm very proud of that."

It's basically gibberish the way she stated it. I assume she meant that 90% of the Clinton Foundation's budget is spent on programming as opposed to operations. I don't know whether that is true or not. It's a pretty high number for a charity.

As to whether it is misleading to the uninformed? Sure, as a lawyer I could argue that. As a lawyer, I could make arguments for just about anything, and as far as difficult arguments go, arguing that uninformed people may be mislead by something is a pretty easy one.
Click to expand...

Yep, gibberish.

I don't know what "programming" is. I know what "operations" is, I think. And to be "proud" when it comes to a "charity" I'd imagine that "90%" going to whatever the the chosen causes were. But my understanding from previous news articles is that the 90% goes to running the foundation and the chosen causes get the 10%. Me personally, as someone less informed than you, and far more fucking informed than the average viewer, found that misleading. Presuming I hadn't erred in my understanding of the 90/10 split.

Good to know I can count on you to look at things from multiple angles then. So in this instance you can see how millions of people thinking the needy in Haiti got 90% (vs. 10%) could influence their judgment as to weather Haitians had good cause to dislike the Clintons. I actually thought it was one of her better moves of the night. The rest of her game in this debate I'd put on par with @Fawlty's average effort.
 
Throttlehead said:
You can't even get universal background checks to get passed and you guys think someone is going to be able to ban guns, the NRA has stolen your ability to think reasonable.
Click to expand...

Let me guess, Hitlery would do nothing to inhibit the second amendment any further because she loves and respects it.

<{yearp}>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,184
Messages
57,973,169
Members
175,888
Latest member
whatsername

Share this page

Back
Top