- Joined
- Aug 3, 2012
- Messages
- 10,816
- Reaction score
- 42,141
EQUILIBRIUM
![]()
I liked that movie. *hides puppy in trunk*
EQUILIBRIUM
![]()
What?You sound butthurt over nothing.
Been doing it the whole time I've been here bub. Try harder... I'd say try smarter too but I know that's never gunna happen. You don't even check to see if what you are saying is even true.
That makes you look GREAT!
How do you like that?
![]()
Can I walk down the street of Melbourne with my modified AK-47 with a drum clip strapped to my back?We don't have an outright gun ban.
Can I walk down the street of Melbourne with my modified AK-47 with a drum clip strapped to my back?
BULLSHIT!!!There's a mountain of evidence that the DNC rigged the primary and is rigging the presidential election through the corporate mainstream media, through paid provocateurs, and through systemic corruption. It is as rigged an election as in a banana republic.
At this point you have to be deliberately ignoring said evidence to deny that it is rigged.
Moved on to the debate while spendin time with the childrens. If I get up to posting deep, I will address it.
Pretty simple. Any costs associated with the charity are not "spent on the people" or however she put it. So, if you have an office, or an employee. Or use electricity, or mail, or the internet. That money is not "spent on the people." Good charities will tend to have lower percentage operating costs and higher percentage of charitable giving in their budgets. At least 65% for giving is considered good.
I'm glad you're mad about it.
Why would you want to?Can I walk down the street of Melbourne with my modified AK-47 with a drum clip strapped to my back?
What quote?So deep you're in quicksand and sinking.
Imagine you're a lawyer and someone was paying you to find anything misleading (to the uninformed) about that quote. Could you?
In case I saw a croc, of course. I have seen Crocodile Dundee. I know how you guys live.Why would you want to?
What quote?
So, he's definitely said "bigly" at certain points. And now it seems like he's purposefully saying "big league" a lot and enunciating, like a guy who gets caught picking his nose and then keeps visibly pretending to scratch it to pass off the earlier gold digging.
Also, I'm a big fan of "bigly" and I say it quite often now.
Shouldn't you be celebrating this bigliest of debate victories instead of wishing death on your political opponents?
Shouldn't you be celebrating this bigliest of debate victories instead of wishing death on your political opponents?
Cool.
Who won the scientific poll they did?
"We at the Clinton Foundation spent 90%...90% of all the money that is donated on behalf of program of people around the world and our own country. I'm very proud of that."The one central to my post you initially responded to.
Even if he's aware it's a word he isn't using it correctlyApparently, it is a real word... so what is the issue exactly?
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigly
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...dential-debate-us-election-2016-a7370861.html
"We at the Clinton Foundation spent 90%...90% of all the money that is donated on behalf of program of people around the world and our own country. I'm very proud of that."
It's basically gibberish the way she stated it. I assume she meant that 90% of the Clinton Foundation's budget is spent on programming as opposed to operations. I don't know whether that is true or not. It's a pretty high number for a charity.
As to whether it is misleading to the uninformed? Sure, as a lawyer I could argue that. As a lawyer, I could make arguments for just about anything, and as far as difficult arguments go, arguing that uninformed people may be mislead by something is a pretty easy one.
You can't even get universal background checks to get passed and you guys think someone is going to be able to ban guns, the NRA has stolen your ability to think reasonable.