International High-risk HIV groups facing record levels of criminalisation as countries bring in draconian laws

Because males who have sex with other males tend to be far more sexually reckless than people who stick to heterosexual sex. They are much more likely to have sex with many strangers, who also have sex with many strangers and to do so without any sort of protection. It's the male sex drive without any sort of restraint by morality, psychology, or sociology. It's common for gay men to be callous towards the risks and the well being of partners and even a segment of them that are predatory towards young men and boys. And now we have a culture that enables this foolishness.

I remember a couple of years ago when monkey pox seemed to come out of nowhere and was briefly a big deal. It seemed like they were trying to make it into a new COVID hysteria. Then they realized that it was 99% gay men that were getting it, and most of the 1% that weren't adult homosexual men were pets and adopted male children. And apparently a big part of the reason why was that the people getting it is that they would not stop attending all male orgies. The suggestion that they pump the breaks for a couple of months was completely out of the question and shouted down as homophobic stigma.
Yes, HIV nowadays is the same, at least outside of Africa. Once in a while somebody claims that "lots of heterosexuals also get HIV", and that is maybe true in the Congo where people get it from infected needles or something, but in the US, EU, or in other places where you get indoor plumbing it's 90% men that get HIV, among these it's 90% men that have sex with men(MSM) and 10% men that inject drugs.

The 10% of women that get it are women that inject drugs and the ones that have sex with bisexual men.

Even extremely promiscuous straight man that go around raw dogging prostitutes very, very rarely get HIV.



Example of gaslightining:
The truth:
 
Last edited:
It's cause they do bum secks.

Also, it's cultural. Gay dudes have absolutely no shame and are promiscuous as fuck. I used to be a bouncer at a venue that would host gay events often. The amount of unprotected sex that would go on at these events was shocking.

I went to the bathroom and saw one guy (probably @Andy Capp)............orally servicing 8 men!

Another odd thing I noticed was that a lot of the people attending these events who might have known other attendees would peck each other on the lips to say hi. You know how people give kisses on the cheek in the same way? They all peck on the lips that way. Didn't matter the one doing it, or even the one receiving it was in a relationship and their boyfriends were right there,they all pecked each other on the lips as if it was expected.

Obligatory "they aren't all that way!" But generally speaking, they are reckless and promiscuous as fuck in a way that would put lesbians or straight people to shame.

What in the homophobic hell is this??? Omg! They peck each other on the lips!!!!

Yes, some gay men are extremely promiscuous and it is generally a more carefree community but so are straight men that would fuck with a different woman every night if they could regardless of how nasty they were. Men are generally whores and the only thing stopping most men from having sex every day is a willing hole to receive it. When you man+woman=sex, it usually the woman that is the holdout. But when you combine man+man, the hole is almost always willing. It’s not that gay men are more promiscuous, it’s that gay men are more willing to receive than straight women are. And with exception to needle users, lesbians can’t get aids from scissoring or munching box, so there is a low incidence of aids in lesbians because there is no penis or penetration involved.

I feel I have to drop this video in here:
 
What in the homophobic hell is this??? Omg! They peck each other on the lips!!!!

Yes, some gay men are extremely promiscuous and it is generally a more carefree community but so are straight men that would fuck with a different woman every night if they could regardless of how nasty they were. Men are generally whores and the only thing stopping most men from having sex every day is a willing hole to receive it. When you man+woman=sex, it usually the woman that is the holdout. But when you combine man+man, the hole is almost always willing. It’s not that gay men are more promiscuous, it’s that gay men are more willing to receive than straight women are. And with exception to needle users, lesbians can’t get aids from scissoring or munching box, so there is a low incidence of aids in lesbians because there is no penis or penetration involved.

I feel I have to drop this video in here:

I'm going to assume your joking with the first sentence for a couple reasons, but in case you're not......

Out of curiosity, do you have a wife/girlfriend?
If so, how would you feel if one of your homeboys went up to her and pecked her on the lips? You'd be okay with that? You don't find that a little weird?

Edit:
The more I read your post the more confused I am by it.

Your post reinforces what I'm saying. Your explanation isn't a refutation so I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing here. I agree it is by virtue of gay men being MEN that they are the way they are but make no mistake, women, even lesbian women, aren't nearly as close to gay men on this either.

I've done lesbian events too and they aren't even as bad as normal, straight events. I've seen more raunchy shit happen at rock shows than explicitly lesbian/pride events which was weird. And they certainly don't do all that pecking on the lips stuff either.


Not sure what the point of the video you posted is either.
 
Last edited:
We were on the cusp of a cure for AIDS till you know who canned the funding.
 
What in the homophobic hell is this??? Omg! They peck each other on the lips!!!!

Yes, some gay men are extremely promiscuous and it is generally a more carefree community but so are straight men that would fuck with a different woman every night if they could regardless of how nasty they were. Men are generally whores and the only thing stopping most men from having sex every day is a willing hole to receive it. When you man+woman=sex, it usually the woman that is the holdout. But when you combine man+man, the hole is almost always willing. It’s not that gay men are more promiscuous, it’s that gay men are more willing to receive than straight women are. And with exception to needle users, lesbians can’t get aids from scissoring or munching box, so there is a low incidence of aids in lesbians because there is no penis or penetration involved.

I feel I have to drop this video in here:

I swear it's written in the Ts and Cs you need to ask me permission to post that clip.
 
Dude, here's the Canadian government page:


HIV: Undetectable = Untransmittable (U=U)​

The science behind Undetectable = Untransmittable, its benefits in addressing HIV, and how to spread the word.
- Sorry, man. I wasnt doubting you, just was outside my knowledge about HIV.
 
It's cause they do bum secks.

Also, it's cultural. Gay dudes have absolutely no shame and are promiscuous as fuck. I used to be a bouncer at a venue that would host gay events often. The amount of unprotected sex that would go on at these events was shocking.

I went to the bathroom and saw one guy (probably @Andy Capp)............orally servicing 8 men!

Another odd thing I noticed was that a lot of the people attending these events who might have known other attendees would peck each other on the lips to say hi. You know how people give kisses on the cheek in the same way? They all peck on the lips that way. Didn't matter the one doing it, or even the one receiving it was in a relationship and their boyfriends were right there,they all pecked each other on the lips as if it was expected.

Obligatory "they aren't all that way!" But generally speaking, they are reckless and promiscuous as fuck in a way that would put lesbians or straight people to shame.
- My experience also.

Lesbian are only promiscuous in those VHS that @panamaican colects.
 
Yes, HIV nowadays is the same, at least outside of Africa. Once in a while somebody claims that "lots of heterosexuals also get HIV", and that is maybe true in the Congo where people get it from infected needles or something, but in the US, EU, or in other places where you get indoor plumbing it's 90% men that get HIV, among these it's 90% men that have sex with men(MSM) and 10% men that inject drugs.

The 10% of women that get it are women that inject drugs and the ones that have sex with bisexual men.

Even extremely promiscuous straight man that go around raw dogging prostitutes very, very rarely get HIV.



Example of gaslightining:
The truth:
- My uncle had several friends from his drug-head cicles that got HIV from "women". Like yeah, you guys arent even seen talkinmg to women and look like gas-station workers from those awful the Hill have eyes, but several of your friends hapen to get HIV from woman.
 
What in the homophobic hell is this??? Omg! They peck each other on the lips!!!!

Yes, some gay men are extremely promiscuous and it is generally a more carefree community but so are straight men that would fuck with a different woman every night if they could regardless of how nasty they were. Men are generally whores and the only thing stopping most men from having sex every day is a willing hole to receive it. When you man+woman=sex, it usually the woman that is the holdout. But when you combine man+man, the hole is almost always willing. It’s not that gay men are more promiscuous, it’s that gay men are more willing to receive than straight women are. And with exception to needle users, lesbians can’t get aids from scissoring or munching box, so there is a low incidence of aids in lesbians because there is no penis or penetration involved.

I feel I have to drop this video in here:

- Kevin Smith sucks and he ruined Masters of the universe. You should be ashmed of youself!
 
- Kevin Smith sucks and he ruined Masters of the universe. You should be ashmed of youself!
He was good, then he ran out of ideas after Clerks 2 which was only half decent. After that literally nothing but unwatchable garbage
 
He was good, then he ran out of ideas after Clerks 2 which was only half decent. After that literally nothing but unwatchable garbage
I think he lost it before that. That and "Jay And Silent Bob Strike Back" were husks of his former self.

I actually didn't mind his off beat shit, like that cult movie and the stupid walrus movie. If for nothing else, but for taking chances and expanding his horizons. Not great movies, but there were moments where I was thinking "I think he's got this. The man can build tension, and not just write witty commentary."
 
I think he lost it before that. That and "Jay And Silent Bob Strike Back" were husks of his former self.

I actually didn't mind his off beat shit, like that cult movie and the stupid walrus movie. If for nothing else, but for taking chances and expanding his horizons. Not great movies, but there were moments where I was thinking "I think he's got this. The man can build tension, and not just write witty commentary."
- He looked very likeable oin interview i've seen. But he cant mess with our childrenhood like that and make He-man a leftard.
 
Back
Top