The fight said more about Palhares then it did Lombard
The fight said more about Palhares then it did Lombard
While I agree that the sentiment you express is a valid reaction to many posts in the UFC Forum, I don't agree that it applies to the post to which you responded. I don't think Polish Machine intended to discredit Lombard's performance. Nothing in his post is necessarily incompatible with him being impressed by Hector's performance. I actually thought his post was fairly insightful. Just IMO.Never give someone credit. Just discredit his opponent. This is why I try to avoid the UFC Forum.
I agree, many think Weidman should get a title shot but I think he should win once more before he gets one, and honestly I think Lombard would win but if Weidman wins then I'm all for him getting a title shot. Lombard with like a 30 fight win streak, a controversial loss from Boetsch(really a win in most people's eyes), a win over Palhares, a win over Weidman should get him a title shot and if not than 1 more top 5 win should.Feed Weidman to him. Let's see if either deserve a shot against Anderson.
Never give someone credit. Just discredit his opponent. This is why I try to avoid the UFC Forum.
There's going to be alot of fairweather fans jumping on his bandwagon now; but ive been a fan of his for the past 3 years. I always thought he would give Silva and any other MW problems. Not because he is technically superior, but because of his abnormal strength , unusual build for the weight class, good tdd, judo and punching power.