Law Headlining Crime V5

The Police Chief should be ashamed. How can this be framed any other way? You focus on the clips distorting? Distorting what? They cheered and brutally beat 2 older white people. Nothing else matters. People were just walking up and taking kicks. Even females. Two guys in the back cheering, so happy that white people were getting beat. Call a spade a spade, this was a hate crime.
I get what you're saying and you very well could be right. But if we start calling things a hate crime without real proof other than the races of the people involved, we're no better then left. Many of them devote their whole lives to finding a racial angle on a story where it doesn't belong. If the races were reversed here, this thread would be 50 pages long by now. The same posters who would be all over that thread are completely absent from this one. What a shock.
 
I get what you're saying and you very well could be right. But if we start calling things a hate crime without real proof other than the races of the people involved, we're no better then left. Many of them devote their whole lives to finding a racial angle on a story where it doesn't belong. If the races were reversed here, this thread would be 50 pages long by now. The same posters who would be all over that thread are completely absent from this one. What a shock.
And it WOULD be considered a hate crime if roles were reversed. If the guy were black, would random people be walking up kicking him? Because they weren't all together. They guy in the red had 3-4 people with him, no females. The guy that came out of the crowd with the peoples elbow, random, just saw a white guy getting beaten. Those females saw a white guy getting beaten and jumped in with kicks. The more I think about it, the white folks were dumb for even going. The area is known for this type of BS. At the very least the man that knocked out the woman should be charged because that was straight out assault, no fight.
 
Total bullshit. The old white guy DID not just walk up and slap the guy unprovoked. Even if he did, why did a group of animals boot stomp him? Why was the woman brutally knocked out? You could see the type of people these attackers were. Having fun doing it. Cheering each other on. Women getting kicks in just walking up just seeing a white man on the ground. Not stopping. They went for the kill and didn't stop. Your narrative is bullshit and apologetic. You don't continue to stomp the old guys head into the ground no matter what. You don't sucker punch a woman so bad her pics show her worse than a car accident. Fuck these animals they should be charged with attempted murder. Your white man bad narrative is tiring.
What did I say that was BS? The man was attacked because he couldn't keep his hands to himself. I don't condone anything that happened from there, but that context can't be left out if you want to portray what happened accurately, but that's what OP chose to do.
 
What did I say that was BS? The man was attacked because he couldn't keep his hands to himself. I don't condone anything that happened from there, but that context can't be left out if you want to portray what happened accurately, but that's what OP chose to do.
And you leave out what happened BEFORE that, see how that works? The whole thing wasn't filmed. What if Mr. Red did something first? You think Mr. White just did that without provocation? Again, reverse the races, what happens with the news coverage and the charges? The more I watch, several women tried to help, and a man keeps striking them all, white and black. These were animals.
 
did you miss the part where i said the guy who got slapped could beat his ass?
Do you need this spelled all the way out for you? If the black dude swung first I would be saying this was pussy shit. If they both squared up and just started throwing I would be saying this was pussy shit. He just walked up and hit the dude, so fuck him.

Beating the woman was totally indefensible and seriously is pussy shit. I hope those guys get serious prison time for that
 
What did I say that was BS? The man was attacked because he couldn't keep his hands to himself. I don't condone anything that happened from there, but that context can't be left out if you want to portray what happened accurately, but that's what OP chose to do.
And you leave out what happened BEFORE that, see how that works? The whole thing wasn't filmed. What if Mr. Red did something first? You think Mr. White just did that without provocation? Again, reverse the races, what happens with the news coverage and the charges? The more I watch, several women tried to help, and a man keeps striking them all, white and black. These were savage people.
 
Gotcha, so we were bamboozled. Not saying TS is racist but there ain't half been a lot of it on here recently.

Bamboozled by what? Are you retarded?

An altercation between two people should never lead to a mob beat down.

And the people filming and laughing is gross too

Cities would burn if the races were flipped

There’s a disgusting double standard of behavior

 
Here’s asshat rationalizing a mob attack

Fucking clown
Anyone who thinks it's ok to leave out that important context has an agenda. Without it you can call this a black on white hate crime, but that's not what this was, and I think that's important to know.
 
And you leave out what happened BEFORE that, see how that works? The whole thing wasn't filmed. What if Mr. Red did something first? You think Mr. White just did that without provocation? Again, reverse the races, what happens with the news coverage and the charges? The more I watch, several women tried to help, and a man keeps striking them all, white and black. These were savage people.
I still don't understand where you're coming from. I'm not here to justify anything. I responded to add important context, which is that this man wasn't attacked because he was white, but rather because he slapped someone.

Look at the thread title. It's a misrepresentation of what happened.
 
Pointing out you hiding behind fake values & that you have no credibility is on topic for a thread that you are seeking the moral high ground in, dumbass.
Its just more proof people cant trust your point when you have different standards for different groups of people. Or when you set a standard, then ignore certain racist people trampling that standard. You have to do better than that. Make a poll. See who the forum thinks is most useless post your recent crash-outs.


-Ask yourself the same questions and use that same standard when you derail or deflect every thread with Obama, "the left," Clinton & Hunter's laptop. You go first...

-There is no serious engagement to be had for liars who support filthy people. Your ever changing takes on crime and race depending on who commits it will never be taken seriously by objective people with backbones.
-Its very on topic when it comes to race. If you constantly excuse war crimes, corruption, fraud, cover-ups, lies, constitutional violations, & sexual abuse of all kinds for one group of elite rich white men....Condemning people who took care of an instigator who assaulted other people first seems comical & forced.

-The best tactic to spot racist or people who are intentionally dishonest about race are simple role reversals:
If a Black man walked up to a group of white people and just slapped one of them many people in this thread would 100% justify him getting fkn shot if that happened. Or say "thug got what he deserved....x% of the problem."
I think you're confusing me with other posters. Ironically, painting with a broad brush.
 
I still don't understand where you're coming from. I'm not here to justify anything. I responded to add important context, which is that this man wasn't attacked because he was white, but rather because he slapped someone.

Look at the thread title. It's a misrepresentation of what happened.
So if the guy in the red and the white guy got in a fight, you would have a point. That is not what happened and you know it. He was jumped by gangs of people that weren't even all together. What do you say to that? So these random people walking up kicking him did that because he wasn't white? STOP....The filming of the brawl with cheering by other random people not involved in the incident, wasn't because he was white? You think random people would have jumped in on another black guy or just let two people fight it out? STOP.
 
And it WOULD be considered a hate crime if roles were reversed. If the guy were black, would random people be walking up kicking him? Because they weren't all together. They guy in the red had 3-4 people with him, no females. The guy that came out of the crowd with the peoples elbow, random, just saw a white guy getting beaten. Those females saw a white guy getting beaten and jumped in with kicks. The more I think about it, the white folks were dumb for even going. The area is known for this type of BS. At the very least the man that knocked out the woman should be charged because that was straight out assault, no fight.
If course it would be considered a hate crime by the media and other apologists for racism. A white kid smirking at and Indian provoked nation wide outrage by the same people who couldn't care less about this story. That speaks volumes about the value of their opinion.
 
so the couple started it? probably not a great idea. i'm sure there were probably no racial slurs involved either that would incense an entire group of black people. FAFO situation, i fear.
 
Anyone who thinks it's ok to leave out that important context has an agenda. Without it you can call this a black on white hate crime, but that's not what this was, and I think that's important to know.

I don’t give a fuck

The old man was curb stomped and beat on the ground by multiple people

So all those people are allowed to kick him after he’s down because why?

Did the old man pull a knife? A gun? Threaten everyone’s lives? He slapped a guy?

Well, that’s ok. Put him in a coma next time

Fuck off rationalizing this shit

Oh.. dude was out on bail for another felony



Shocking

Liberals prioritizing criminals over innocent civilians
 
So if the guy in the red and the white guy got in a fight, you would have a point. That is not what happened and you know it. He was jumped by gangs of people that weren't even all together. What do you say to that? So these random people walking up kicking him did that because he wasn't white? STOP....The filming of the brawl with cheering by other random people not involved in the incident, wasn't because he was white? You think random people would have jumped in on another black guy or just let two people fight it out? STOP.
I don't recall myself justifying or defending any of that, but correct me if I'm wrong. I would say that everything you mentioned was disgusting and unwarranted, and I hope everyone involved is held accountable, especially the dude who punched that woman. But I think it's wrong to post a story like this and portray it as a racially motivated hate crime while leaving out what started the physical violence. Do you disagree?
 
I don’t give a fuck

The old man was curb stomped and beat on the ground by multiple people

So all those people are allowed to kick him after he’s down because why?

Did the old man pull a knife? A gun? Threaten everyone’s lives? He slapped a guy?

Well, that’s ok. Put him in a coma next time

Fuck off rationalizing this shit

Oh.. dude was out on bail for another felony



Shocking

Liberals prioritizing criminals over innocent civilians

I never justified any of that bro.
 
Back
Top