- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 93,808
- Reaction score
- 14,446
I watched the first episode and meh.
did it get better?
did it get better?
I watched the first episode and meh.
did it get better?
I watched the first episode and meh.
did it get better?
If you didnt like the first episode, I doubt youll get much enjoyment out of the others.
Finally finished it. I've always been fascinated by Chernobyl and nuclear destruction in general. I think the overwhelming praise hyped me up too much. I thought it was good, not great.
The first 2 episodes were very solid and then I felt it wore out its welcome. My biggest problem is that it felt a little virtue signaly and anti-Russian propaganda. While it genuinely felt like the 80s and I praise the production, the clothing, the aesthetics, the practical effects and all of the technical aspects, the story telling is what kept it from being great to me.
Rather than being as accurate as possible, they dumbed it down to the American audience. They made up a Mary Sue character, put the blame on the explosion on 3 villains and more egregiously, blew it by having English actors speaking English dialogue.
I would have much preferred an extremely smart and accurate story with Russian actors speaking Russian with English subs and leaving out the Mary Sue and villain sub plots. It also only needed to be 3 episodes at the most.
I'm going to go 7/10 but it easily could have been 8 or 9 with proper story telling. Other than the story, everything else was virtually flawless and definitely made me question nuclear power and man's ignorance of its ramifications.
What made the villain side inaccurate? There was actually a trial for their criminal negligence, correct?
What made the villain side inaccurate? There was actually a trial for their criminal negligence, correct?
I don't recall all of the names but the "main" bad guy at the plant was portrayed as evil and just wanted a promotion. He didn't listen to his workers despite their warnings and forced them to do the test.
....None of this happened. As far as we know, the workers followed orders and didn't question the test. It was simply the case of cutting corners, saving money and saving energy. The Russians were notorious for doing this across the board. Case in point, the space program. Just tons of negligence and "see what happens" types of tests.
He was definitely guilty and knew it was risky but it was par for the course back then and they took the fall for the incident because someone had to.
Do we know all this though? Dyatlov apparently claimed he was following orders. Other reports claim that Dyatlov ran the test while the reactor was in a very dangerous state of low power and forced subordinates to listen to him.
Fomin apparently forced Sitnikov to look into the reactor and even after reports refused to believe the core had exploded. Apparently he just kept telling people to put water on the core.
Bryukhanov seems like he was probably just a plant manager and a yes man. He too refused to believe the core had exploded and took the wrong steps after the disaster that made things worse.
Obviously these 3 were the fall guys but they certainly weren't innocent from everything I've read. Dyatlov was in charge the of the test and allowed it to happen b/c of political pressure. The other 2 were just part of the cover up as far as I know.
I don't guess we'll really ever know. It was the Cold War and the only information that got out is what has leaked or people that have talked. Everything I've read, the workers didn't fight back, refuse to do the tests or even questioned it. Dyatlov wasn't trying to get a promotion. He was just ordered to run the tests to try to save money and energy.
I'm just nitpicking but I just didn't like how they portrayed him as some Darth Vader villain trying to use the Death Star to blow up a planet. He was just following orders. Yes, he was definitely complicit and knew it was potentially unsafe but I think it was a little heavy handed and comic bookish. I would have just preferred an accurate narrative of incompetence and negligence instead of trying to go Hollywood movie.
This narrator to this documentary is a little annoying but it's solid otherwise: