I was thinking the same thing. It's easy to crap on Russia during this show and say how stupid their government was and how they just covered things up and only cared about their reputation and egos.
But I'm honestly not sure our government would have reacted much differently. Yes of course there would have been some differences b/c communism vs democracy and all that.....but there still would have been attempted cover ups and saving face and scapegoats I'm sure of it.
Really ? I wish there were more episodes.Binged through it yesterday. It was decent but probably could've been shortened to 2 or 3 episodes.
Finally finished it. I've always been fascinated by Chernobyl and nuclear destruction in general. I think the overwhelming praise hyped me up too much. I thought it was good, not great.
The first 2 episodes were very solid and then I felt it wore out its welcome. My biggest problem is that it felt a little virtue signaly and anti-Russian propaganda. While it genuinely felt like the 80s and I praise the production, the clothing, the aesthetics, the practical effects and all of the technical aspects, the story telling is what kept it from being great to me.
Rather than being as accurate as possible, they dumbed it down to the American audience. They made up a Mary Sue character, put the blame on the explosion on 3 villains and more egregiously, blew it by having English actors speaking English dialogue.
I would have much preferred an extremely smart and accurate story with Russian actors speaking Russian with English subs and leaving out the Mary Sue and villain sub plots. It also only needed to be 3 episodes at the most.
I'm going to go 7/10 but it easily could have been 8 or 9 with proper story telling. Other than the story, everything else was virtually flawless and definitely made me question nuclear power and man's ignorance of its ramifications.
I feel like the "Mary Sue" term just gets thrown around way too often when a female accomplishes things. They didint "make her up". They condensed dozens of characters and made her their representation, which is fairly typical of adaptations.
The three guys in question are very much a huge part of the blame, but hardly all of it. Theres lots of things that contributed to the disaster, but the 3 men were instrumental in it, and largley a focus because they were also the scapegoats as the show portrayed.
Yes of course there would have been some differences b/c communism vs democracy
Glenfield tower, 72 dead caused by massive incompetence at all levels. Current number of arrests...... 0.
The miniseries equivalent of pointy elbows.Finally finished it. I've always been fascinated by Chernobyl and nuclear destruction in general. I think the overwhelming praise hyped me up too much. I thought it was good, not great.
The first 2 episodes were very solid and then I felt it wore out its welcome. My biggest problem is that it felt a little virtue signaly and anti-Russian propaganda. While it genuinely felt like the 80s and I praise the production, the clothing, the aesthetics, the practical effects and all of the technical aspects, the story telling is what kept it from being great to me.
Rather than being as accurate as possible, they dumbed it down to the American audience. They made up a Mary Sue character, put the blame on the explosion on 3 villains and more egregiously, blew it by having English actors speaking English dialogue.
I would have much preferred an extremely smart and accurate story with Russian actors speaking Russian with English subs and leaving out the Mary Sue and villain sub plots. It also only needed to be 3 episodes at the most.
I'm going to go 7/10 but it easily could have been 8 or 9 with proper story telling. Other than the story, everything else was virtually flawless and definitely made me question nuclear power and man's ignorance of its ramifications.