No one needs excuses in discussions with you. For a reason.Yeah and it's called taking punches in the face, hence why there's a cut.
Excuses...
IMHO you even didn't had watched combat sport fights enough....
No one needs excuses in discussions with you. For a reason.Yeah and it's called taking punches in the face, hence why there's a cut.
Excuses...
I didn't see the fight yet, but it was apparently a close fight, so the outcome is completely logical :
- Don't expect to win in a close fight when you're the challenger.
- At the end of the fight, Haney's face is completely clean while Loma is visibly hurt.
Haney won fair and square.
They usually give the victory to the champion in a close fight. However, the real score should have been a split or majority decision, not an unanimous one.
Not sure but for an undisputed world title fight they really should've had some diversity as far as nationality is concerned. Last night at the post-fight press conference Bob Arum complained about them all being American when he's the one that could've ensured that there was diversity on the judging panel. It was his show. Loma's manager also revealed that they didn't want Moretti judging but the NSAC insisted and said that he was one of their best judges. The card he turned in last night suggests otherwise.why were all judges american ? one of the fighters was an american and the other was not .. judges should be from countries not associated with either fighter at the very least .. having all of them be american looks quite shady .. it's akin to having all mexican judges in a canelo fight vs an american
crazy that every forum regular who knows boxing & doesn’t swing from loma’s nuts scored this the same wayI scored it 7-5 Haney live and wouldn’t cry if Loma had been declared the winner.
As for answering the thread title (ie « Who won the fight ? ») Haney won it via UD.
if you gave lomachenko the 12th round, never watch this sport again.lomachenko and haney were pretty even goin into the 10th. i think most can agree it could have been a draw up to then...
but it's dead clear lomachenko took the championship rounds.
lomachenko won that fight.
i actually think getting a KO does you great harm in terms of winning a decision.Bingo. One word a synonym for the other.
If you are younger, with more money/potential behind you and your name is on the left side of the poster...if all three of those things happen in one fighter going into a fight, his opponent will need a KO to get a decision.
Watching Pac Bradley 1 I didn't think it was really that close at all. I even remember me and friends leaving the bar before decision as we all thought it was Pac easily. This fight was similar for me that way.I agree it was like Pac/Bradley 1. Close fight that could have gone either way.
I gave the early rounds to Haney and late rounds to Loma. It was a very close fight, slight edge to Loma landing the more solid punches. But if your the contender, you should never leave it to the judges. They usually lean towards the champion when it's a close fight like that.
Respect to both fighters, the both fought a hell of a fight.
Watching Pac Bradley 1 I didn't think it was really that close at all. I even remember me and friends leaving the bar before decision as we all thought it was Pac easily. This fight was similar for me that way.
Judging a fight form the faces of the fighters is not a valid way.
It is objectively discernible though from the tape that haney got hit much more in the head thna lomachenko did.
It's not the only way (obviously) but it will logically influence the judges.
He didn't get hit a lot and mostly from weak punches : never in trouble + clean face at the end of the fight.
Watch this video, you basically only hear the punches from Haney.
After reading all that so-called controversy, i can say that people are really biased either because they don't like Haney or because Loma has a lot of fanboys.
He didn't deserve the win, the judges were right.
It's not the only way (obviously) but it will logically influence the judges.
He didn't get hit a lot and mostly from weak punches : never in trouble + clean face at the end of the fight.
Watch this video, you basically only hear the punches from Haney.
After reading all that so-called controversy, i can say that people are really biased either because they don't like Haney or because Loma has a lot of fanboys.
He didn't deserve the win, the judges were right.
A rematch makes most sense here doubt it occurs as Haney won't want it.
forget fan boys .. people who picked haney are saying loma won .. at the very least, it should've been a draw if you're gonna rob the other guy like that .. haney himself and his team knew he might've lost by their body language waiting for the decision .. that says it all