- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Messages
- 8,125
- Reaction score
- 125
I saw the video and article today, I honestly thought its from today. Still new/unmentioned info in this vid thoC'mon son... video was uploaded to youtube on July 6
I saw the video and article today, I honestly thought its from today. Still new/unmentioned info in this vid thoC'mon son... video was uploaded to youtube on July 6
This is a video uploaded like a month ago from an interview that happened before that.The article with this video is from today, why do you think this is from before 200?
This video is old, and lets not pretend like false positives have never happened. They have twice this year alone and it's only August (possibly more, just 2 come to mind right away).
Who did they happen to?This video is old, and lets not pretend like false positives have never happened. They have twice this year alone and it's only August (possibly more, just 2 come to mind right away).
I'll reedit the title but video is from 4 weeks ago, not exactly ancient and usada isn't changing so gsp saying he has issues with them (for wtvr reason) won't changeThis video is old, and lets not pretend like false positives have never happened. They have twice this year alone and it's only August (possibly more, just 2 come to mind right away).
It's from December 12, 2015I'll reedit the title but video is from 4 weeks ago, not exactly ancient and usada isn't changing so gsp saying he has issues with them (for wtvr reason) won't change
Perhaps it's a stretch, but I would put Yoel Romero and Tim Means in this category.Who did they happen to?
There's a very clear difference between a false positive and an instance of inadvertent use, but maybe GSP meant what you explained.Perhaps it's a stretch, but I would put Yoel Romero and Tim Means in this category.
I don't think GSP is referring to false positives in a literal sense. I think he sees guys like Romero and Means (for example) being screwed out of high profile fights (Means was supposed to fight Donald Cerrone; Romero was all but guaranteed a title shot).
[Note: Romero and Means were both prey to tainted supplements, but I think a lot of fighters see cases like Romero and it makes fighters all the more uncertain regarding the future.]
YesThere's a very clear difference between a false positive and an instance of inadvertent use, but maybe GSP meant what you explained.
HGH gut
Distinctive stomach dimples common in juicers
Characteristics of a cheater
Make your own conclusions.
What? I'm sure he might be concerned about tainted supplements; anybody with a brain would be.Yes
Because gsp gives a shit about someone called tim means
More like what supplement can he blameWhat? I'm sure he might be concerned about tainted supplements; anybody with a brain would be.
Yeah the tainted supplement defense only works when somebody tests positive for something that is unlisted on the ingredient label of an already approved supplement. Tim and Yoel are the only ones who have successfully proven this whereas Jon Jones will have absolutely zero chance of using this defense. The other guy that was cleared (Islam Makhachev) was due to having something in his body that was not banned at the time he took it.Perhaps it's a stretch, but I would put Yoel Romero and Tim Means in this category.
I don't think GSP is referring to false positives in a literal sense. I think he sees guys like Romero and Means (for example) being screwed out of high profile fights (Means was supposed to fight Donald Cerrone; Romero was all but guaranteed a title shot).
[Note: Romero and Means were both prey to tainted supplements, but I think a lot of fighters see cases like Romero and it makes fighters all the more uncertain regarding the future.]
I'm sorry, I'm really missing your point. How does any of this have to do with GSP blurring the terms "false positive" and "tainted supplement" and what point are you trying to make?More like what supplement can he blame
Eg Jones