Objective qualifications become easier when you get this ambitious.
If The Shining doesn't make the cut, and if that's where you wish to set the benchmark
Not really where I set the benchmark, but pointed it out because it also has its share of detractors. I have a movie guide book done by Mick Martin and Marsha Porter that gave it a mere 2.5/5. If I wanted a benchmark, then I could point out Liberty Valance. What lists does that make? I'm not sure why you wouldn't want to include the likes of The General, One Flew, M, and Metropolis. They all have better scores than The Shining at rottentomatoes. The General is #34 on Sight & Sound's list, #143 on IMDB, and #18 on AFI's list. M and Metropolis aren't eligible for the AFI list as they're German films, but M is #56 on the Sight & Sound list, and #74 at IMDB while Metropolis is #36 on the Sight & Sound list and #104 at IMDB. Empire magazine has them both high on their The 100 Best Films Of World Cinema list. Then, there's One Flew which has a better placement than The Shining on Sight & Sound's director list, is #16 at IMDB, #33 on AFI's list, and it won 5 Academy Awards (Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, Best Actress, and Screenplay).
It doesn't even make the cut for the AFI's Greatest 100 Films and you're trying to argue that it has the canonical capital to make a case for it. If it registered on this level, then it would be on that list, not parked in the also-ran handicap list for comedies. Sherlock Jr. doesn't cut it.
You know what else isn't on AFI's top 100 list? The Shining. I can look at Sight & Sound's top 250 list and see Sherlock, Jr. at #59 while The Shining is tied at #154. Sherlock, Jr. has an 8.3 rating at IMDB, which is just a hair below The Shining. If I look at rottentomatoes, then The Shining is at 88% with an average rating of 8.5, and an audience score of 4/5 while Sherlock, Jr. is at 97% with an average rating of 9.7 and an audience score of 4.3/5.
Think about what you're asserting. In this context you are placing Sherlock Jr. on par with Apocalypse Now, Rear Window, A Touch of Evil, Rashomon, The Bridge on the River Kwai, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, Saving Private Ryan, Raging Bull or Goodfellas
Yes, it's on par. The only thing holding it back is its short runtime of about 45 mins. I get it, some may not consider it because of its runtime. What makes Liberty Valance on par with those listed movies?