Good new t-nation article (VO2/cardio write up)

Discussion in 'Strength & Conditioning Discussion' started by Orion, Mar 25, 2008.

  1. Orion

    Orion Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,626
    Likes Received:
    858
    I found this pretty interesting myself because I didn't really ever look at cardio like this for some reason. After reading the #3 point I'm thinking to myself "well duh!" but for some reason I never thought about it like this:

    http://www.t-nation.com/readArticle.do?id=2035719

     
  2. Timbaland

    Timbaland Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    5,541
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    510
    Interesting. So for combat sports, the best cardio for it would be sparring then.
     
  3. John L Sullivan

    John L Sullivan Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    3
    The words "good" and "t-nation article" are a contradiction in terms, unless it's something by Berardi. It's a body-building Web site, after all.

    Good to know that sprints, HIIT, jumping rope, tabatas, running, etc. won't help my cardio. The only things I can do are striking and grappling. Been wasting all this time.
     
  4. Halical

    Halical White Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    lance armstrong wasn't really training to win the event, it was more for charity. he stated before the race that he wanted a sub 3 hour run if i remember correctly
     
  5. MikeMartial

    MikeMartial Black Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    6,401
    Likes Received:
    8
    Location:
    Lactate Threshold
    You have to be selective in what you read on T-nation; Cosgrove is a very knowledgable writer, but with point#3, I have to disagree.

    "The cardio conditioning required to run a 10K won't transfer to motocross or jujitsu."

    While I agree with this MOSTLY, a high aerobic capacity WILL transfer to other sports. Using Lance in a charity race as the ultimate example is blurring the actual concept of variety in training.

    Like John said, there's a reason athletes, especially MMA athletes, so a variety of type of conditioning. On a personal note, my conditioning in the ring didn't improve until I started doing more HIIT outside of class, completely unrelated to sparring.
     
  6. Orion

    Orion Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,626
    Likes Received:
    858
    They help to a certain point but like they said in the article, when it becomes sport specific, training in that sport specifically is going to increase your cardio more than anything. If I had to choose sparring more or doing burpees, I'd choose the sparring. Does that mean that burpees etc. are totally useless? No. Of course they supplement your cardio, but not enough to where it's optimal for a fight.

    They said Lance Armstrong could run 16 miles. That's a pretty damn good carry over from his cycling. But it wasn't enough to win in a marathon. I'm betting the 1st place winner trained for a marathon.

    The point of the article is some people just rely completely on one type of endurance work when you need to look at the full spectrum and add more of one or the other. This article was a reminder of a revelation I had months back when I was just focusing too much on the HIIT craze and not enough on my sport itself.

    ps. Just because the site focuses mostly on hypertrophy doesn't mean it's a bad site to pay attention to for other information. Theres plenty of great articles on there by guys like Cosgrove and Cressey.
     
  7. DaMadMonk

    DaMadMonk Blue Belt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with this point to a certain degree.

    I remember when I was younger I would skip for 20 mins straight. Figured I could jog for 20 or so.

    I was dying by 5 mins.


    I believe this article along with any other article (t-nation or not), its a tool to use.
     
  8. erco

    erco Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    1
    Cosgrove and Cressey are both regular contributers with very interesting articles. Dave Tate used to have contributions. Let's also not forget Dan John is also a regular. CT has some background cred, despite the stuff he writes about nowadays. Boyle, TC, and Shugart are retards though.
     
  9. Donut62

    Donut62 Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,253
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    The Void
    Add Waterbury to that list. The only articles I find myself going back to are Tate's and Dan John's.

    For a guy that talks about the 'pendulum' of fitness swinging to extremes, Cosgrove went and did that exact thing with this piece. Yes, a degree of specificity must be present, but to write off anything not replicating the sport as he seems to be inferring is ridiculous and goes against what most people have proven in training.
     
  10. erco

    erco Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    1
    I didn't get taht impression from the article. I think he was just inferring stuff that we've known all along. Regardless, yes, Waterbury needs to be on the retard list.
     
  11. Donut62

    Donut62 Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,253
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    The Void
    You want to hear about a fitness revolution??? Lift things fast! And while your at it, lift more often! UNBELIEVEABLE GENIUS OMG
     
  12. Orion

    Orion Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,626
    Likes Received:
    858
    Amen.
     
  13. JRT6

    JRT6 Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    5,131
    Likes Received:
    62
    Location:
    Chasing the Dragon
    I didn't really like the article, especially the point that strength is the single most determining factor in a sport. That being said I generally agree with Cosgrove on the whole cardio thing. Guys on here swear up and down that the old paradigm that fighters have to do distance running to be in condition. When was the last time you've seen a distance runner prepare for a marathon by doing bag work?
     
  14. Ian Coe

    Ian Coe Silver Belt Professional Fighter

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    UK
    I feel like I'm stalking you JRT.


    Let me ask you a alternative question. When was the last time you saw a good fighter with poorly conditioned legs?

    I'm not saying running, cycling, swimming whatever, I'm just asking about poorly conditioned legs.
     
  15. Monger

    Monger Chronically Injured

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2005
    Messages:
    4,621
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Emergency Room
    Since you commented that you agree with the statement "mostly", you probably already understand the comment I'm about to make.

    Just for clarity, I don't think that Cosgrove meant that there is no crossover benefit from training something other than your specific sport. Although, I completely understand how one could think that by how the article was written. What I believe he is implying is that there is an aspect of local muscular endurance and neural efficiency involved with sport specific movements that contribute highly to being able to "last longer" in your sport. Those are the things that may not necessarily have carry over. But of course, VO2 max and conditioning in general will always have crossover benefits.
     
  16. JRT6

    JRT6 Black Belt

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    5,131
    Likes Received:
    62
    Location:
    Chasing the Dragon
    I agree that fighters need conditioned legs I just disagree with you on the method. Compare the legs of a sprinter vs that of a distance runner. I want the sprinter legs in a fight. Or better yet the wheels of some them rubgy players that look they could carry the whole team down the field.
     
  17. Ian Coe

    Ian Coe Silver Belt Professional Fighter

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    146
    Location:
    UK

    I haven't said exclusive use of running.
    Running in all of its forms is a tool to help you achieve your goals, nothing more.


    Also, while true having big/strong legs is desirable, you've got to consider the negatives (/work a training strategy to overcome/negate the negatives)
     
  18. grownage

    grownage White Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NYC
    a 3 hour finish for a first time marathoner is very good. lance's cardio translated well into endurance for the marathon.
     
  19. $uperman

    $uperman Black Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,473
    Likes Received:
    536
    edit.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2011

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.