I never understand this rebuke from gun twats.
We get it that you guy's have made very specific, unnecessary and arbitrary definitions of "semi-auto," "full-auto," "machine gun," etc....; and then lol yourselves right out of the argument if someone doesn't nail the right term spot on.
We get it. You guys jerk off while sniffing each other's holsters.
Regardless of what term the OP used, bickering over a definition doesn't address the point. Which was that we have a dipshit gun owner here doing something stupid. Not that the OP is really threadworthy. But at least try to address the topic. You don't just auto win the argument because someone on the other side incorrectly identified a weapons rate of fire, or used some off industry term like "assault rifle."
How you guys think this is some big rebuttal is just desperate.