Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread

[Ares Black]

https://supersally.substack.com/p/h...on_id=429125&post_id=85454204&isFreemail=true

"Heavily Jabbed and Boosted Australia is into its 5th Wave of Covid-19 Infections for 2022. The Government is not recommending 5th Doses. Woolworths Rolls Back Mandatory Jabs. Excess Deaths Continue!"


Australias Nsw data backs his statement up more then you...

"NSW Australia Data for Hospitalization and ICU rates continues to look far worse for the multiply jabbed. That green line shows outcomes for the 4-dosed over time! Their situation is getting worse. No doses are sitting pretty flat, right at the bottom.
4x-dosed are also dying at far higher rates. No doses have far fewer deaths.
The double only jabbed seem to have some slight benefit for prevention of death, which is lost with boosters. There is no apparent benefit in reduced hospitalization for any of the dose regimens"

Joel Smalley paints an even clearer picture.

https://metatron.substack.com/p/new-south-wales-nsw-revisited

"It's still a pandemic *BECAUSE* of the vaccinated.
New South Wales (NSW) revisited."
.
"It is clear that the 4-jabbers are dying at substantially higher rates than every other dose status. In fact, the entire COVID death distribution in July to Aug 2022 is driven by the 4-jabbers."

You are literally posting blogs as sources.

 

[mon]

You are literally posting blogs as sources.

And? If this thread has shown me one thing its the intellectually dishonest will always attack a source and never the content. Just saying.....

You don't find it at all concerning that there have been so many doctors stating that these drugs are destroying the immune systems of the takers and we will see outbreaks of latent viruses and diseases due to it, multiple outbreaks later Areas Black sees no potential link. Its like Beert Vanden Bosche has pretty much nailed the entire pandemic bar the timing and crickets.

 

[maximus__]

Billions have been vaccinated. Why aren't they dead yet?

Depending on who you ask we all are. October 10th was one date mentioned and I believe JFK was going to come and deliver us from Bill gates at some point.
This thread has people believing that the vaccinated have shed vaccines across to them... Never mind the fact that anything like that could easily be attributed to the actual covid virus.
I personally lean more on the side of us all having just taken a flu shot until they worked out the best way to treat covid for sick people.
I actually think that long term we will find out covid itself was actually pretty bad all round for everyone before it became Omicron.

 

[Ares Black]

And? If this thread has shown me one thing its the intellectually dishonest will always attack a source and never the content. Just saying.....

And they aren't legitimate sources.

All the legitimate peer-reviewed data says you are wrong.

An antivaxx blog by SuperSally888 says that you're right.


Hmmmm. Tough call.

 

[maximus__]

You are literally posting blogs as sources.

It's even funnier when you put in the effort to look at the studies or sources those blog posters use a reference in the posts.
Don't point it out though otherwise you will get an obscenity laden tirade in response.
Let's just ignore the argument from authority posts but only acknowledging the expert that agrees with the chosen opinion.
You would almost think that everyone in here has already made their minds up one way or the other.

 

[mon]

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/rea...on_id=516896&post_id=85294123&isFreemail=true

"Real time obstetrician/gynecologist's data on new patients and miscarriages for 2021 and 2022 (and now 2020 for baseline)"
.
Good
Charts
For
Trends
Observations
.
"If we only look at the December 2021 miscarriage rate and compare it to the 2022 rates, we get a clearer picture of what the miscarriage rates have been since the COVID-19 injectable products have been rolled out in the U.S. when compared to the average for 2021 (excluding December)."

And they aren't legitimate sources.

All the legitimate peer-reviewed data says you are wrong.

An antivaxx blog by SuperSally888 says that you're right.


Hmmmm. Tough call.

Lol did you even read or look. Besides the pure opinion pieces almost all use government daya i.e. Joel Smalley and a ton of others.


We can strip the intellectual and just apply the dishonest i suspect.


Was posting so please forgive the mismash

 

[Ares Black]

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/rea...on_id=516896&post_id=85294123&isFreemail=true

"Real time obstetrician/gynecologist's data on new patients and miscarriages for 2021 and 2022 (and now 2020 for baseline)"
.
Good
Charts
For
Trends
Observations
.
"If we only look at the December 2021 miscarriage rate and compare it to the 2022 rates, we get a clearer picture of what the miscarriage rates have been since the COVID-19 injectable products have been rolled out in the U.S. when compared to the average for 2021 (excluding December)."




Lol did you even read or look. Besides the pure opinion pieces almost all use government daya i.e. Joel Smalley and a ton of others.


We can strip the intellectual and just apply the dishonest i suspect.


Was posting so please forgive the mismash

Another blog..... Jesus Christ dude. No wonder you have these views. You clearly have no idea how to tell if a source is legitimate.

So far you have posted three blogs and a YouTube video as proof of your claim. It is very difficult to determine if the data in any of them is actually legitimate, or more importantly, if the authors of the blogs are interpreting and presenting that data correctly.

I get that you really believe this nonsense, and that's too bad. But if you want anyone to take your claims seriously you will need to present actual proof from a legitimate source.

Not a blog written by SuperSally888.

 

[Ares Black]

It's even funnier when you put in the effort to look at the studies or sources those blog posters use a reference in the posts.
Don't point it out though otherwise you will get an obscenity laden tirade in response.
Let's just ignore the argument from authority posts but only acknowledging the expert that agrees with the chosen opinion.
You would almost think that everyone in here has already made their minds up one way or the other.

It is WILD. I've actually read all the blogs he posted, and they are so obviously bullshit I almost think he's trolling me.

 

[mon]

Another blog..... Jesus Christ dude. No wonder you have these views. You clearly have no idea how to tell if a source is legitimate.

So far you have posted three blogs and a YouTube video as proof of your claim. It is very difficult to determine if the data in any of them is actually legitimate, or more importantly, if the authors of the blogs are interpreting and presenting that data correctly.

I get that you really believe this nonsense, and that's too bad. But if you want anyone to take your claims seriously you will need to present actual proof from a legitimate source.

Not a blog written by SuperSally888.

As i said, dishonest. Take data from the blogs and use it to prove their analysis is incorrect or fraudulent?

That'll give me something i can work with. Its The reason you haven't and attack the "name/label" is due to your dishonesty (@ least my belief anyway)

 

[Ares Black]

As i said, dishonest. Take data from the blogs and use it to prove their analysis is incorrect or fraudulent?

That'll give me something i can work with. Its The reason you haven't and attack the "name/label" is due to your dishonesty (@ least my belief anyway)

Vetting your sources is literally the first thing you should learn how to do if you actually want to understand the world.

You can't go through life believing everything you read in a blog.

You are not qualified to accurately interpret that data(even if it is legitimate). Neither am I. Neither are the authors of those blogs.

And the third blog you shared, the "data" was literally just homemade charts from an anonymous "contact" . It's quite literally the least credible proof I have ever seen in my entire life.

Example:

Like I said, you are free to believe whatever conspiracy theory bullshit you want. Just don't get mad at me because I require actual sources.

 

[Super_Nintendo]

You have been brainwashed by Big Conspiracy. You're hopeless.

And yet... Covid cases are well down...

<{Red Card}>

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

A mild cold that killed millions of people.

Jesus Christ dude.

No it didn't.
Just because doctors were made to put covid on death certificates, regardless of whether they knew they had covid or that it actually had anything to do with that person dying, does not mean covid killed millions. Because that is plain and simply a fucking lie.

'died after testing positive' is not the same as dying because of covid.
Look into the actual hard facts and you'll see you're wrong and I'm right.

 

[maximus__]

It is WILD. I've actually read all the blogs he posted, and they are so obviously bullshit I almost think he's trolling me.

I did the same and kept pointing this out to a few posters here.
I managed to catch a virus from one of the links as a heads up. I am apparently the worst person in the world because my immediate response wasn't to do everything in my power to post on Sherdog.
It's a pointless exercise pointing out the absurdity of the posts which are effectively opinion pieces at this point. It's become a safe space for people because I am guessing people in real life are sick of hearing about the conspiracy crap. You challenge that and it just results in name calling.

 

[maximus__]

No it didn't.
Just because doctors were made to put covid on death certificates, regardless of whether they knew they had covid or that it actually had anything to do with that person dying, does not mean covid killed millions. Because that is plain and simply a fucking lie.

'died after testing positive' is not the same as dying because of covid.
Look into the actual hard facts and you'll see you're wrong and I'm right.

Does this logic apply to claims people are dying from the vaccine ? That's what this thread has become using the same logic you just mentioned in reverse.

 

[ReligiousDiscipline]

 

[Nimrod]

Yeah, they were shitty.

You know what would have been shittier? The collapse of society due to an out of control pandemic.

You really are making it into the Sherdog Hall of stupid..
Queen B and Andy Capp sitting at the top of the league table.

 

[Nimrod]

Does this logic apply to claims people are dying from the vaccine ? That's what this thread has become using the same logic you just mentioned in reverse.

So people are dieing from the jab?

 

[mon]

Vetting your sources is literally the first thing you should learn how to do if you actually want to understand the world.

You can't go through life believing everything you read in a blog.

You are not qualified to accurately interpret that data(even if it is legitimate). Neither am I. Neither are the authors of those blogs.

And the third blog you shared, the "data" was literally just homemade charts from an anonymous "contact" . It's quite literally the least credible proof I have ever seen in my entire life.

Example:

Like I said, you are free to believe whatever conspiracy theory bullshit you want. Just don't get mad at me because I require actual sources.

Lol, this is what cracks me up. You fixate and try to focus others attention on what you believe is a loose thread while ignoring what you cant dispute.

Joel Smalley used publicly available government data, you seem to be ignoring this?
Ahh another stay in your lane hey. Everyone is qualified but Joel Smalley is a professional statistician , who better qualified to interpret statistics?

What about Norman Fenton?

https://www.normanfenton.com/post/the-ons-data-on-vaccine-mortality-is-not-fit-for-purpose

"All of the anomalies in the dataset introduce bias in favour of analyses supporting vaccine ‘safety and efficacy’. The fact that these data are being used as continued justification for the efficacy and safety of the covid vaccines is therefore now a matter of national concern and scandal. We believe that an investigation into how and why the ONS dataset is so flawed and corrupted is required. In the meantime, we call for


1. the public withdrawal of the ONS dataset and

2. the retraction of any claims made by others that are based upon it"


The difference between us is you have given only your opinion and worse yet disputed at least one expert/professional in their fields.
Yet in your next breath say you aren't qualified to have an opinion, you say their analysis is bullshit yet call names instead of showing where and why they're wrong.

Like almost everything the last two years, dogma

 

[mon]

https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj.o2628

"BMJ Investigation
FDA oversight of clinical trials is “grossly inadequate,” say experts"

A no brainer but for the ignorant.

 

[BearGrounds]

Here's a good video that does a decent job outlining for us a case in which the AMA was abusing its power and suppressing alternative medicine.

This is the case of Harry Hoxsey and his topical herbal cancer treatment. Not directly COVID related, but I really wouldn't know where else to share this video that it wouldn't get sent to the great beyond by some establishment mod, and I think people should watch it.



I think it bears relevance to the topic at hand, as we're dealing with corrupt institutions like the AMA with regards to this pandemic, and this case does a good job of showing how these organizations blackball and suppress alternative treatment methods via tactics like slander and bureaucratic red tape (at the behest of their big business and pharma overlords).