Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread Vol. 2
- Thread starter fedorthegoat777
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 8,794
- Reaction score
- 3,320
Another winter of sEvEre iLLnEsS AnD dEaTh for the unvaccinated???
D
Deleted member 585708
Guest
Probably not.
Seems like the world's most lethal vaccine has stopped killing people too.
Is that wacky nurse guy still talking about graphs or has everyone given up on that inane bullshit now?
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2006
- Messages
- 14,247
- Reaction score
- 16,718
As low as the numbers are. We had roughly a 1000% increase in vaccination deaths in 2022 australia and thats a extremely low low low low count.
Funnily enough despite the humour... It is the most lethal " vaccine " ( certain varients and versions anyhow... ( astrazenica )
( simply because [ from data ive found ] say 2015. There was 0 confirmed deaths from vaccine administration in australia.... possibly 2.
2015
Introduction
This report summarises national passive surveillance data for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) by 28 February 2016. The report focuses on AEFI reported for vaccines administered during 2015 and compares trends in AEFI reporting during 1 January 2000 – 31 December 2015.The most commonly reported reactions were injection site reaction (26%), pyrexia (17%), rash (16%), vomiting (8%) and headache (7%). The majority of AEFI reports (85%) were described as non-serious events. There were two deaths reported, but no clear causal relationship with vaccination was found.
Meanwhile in 2022
According to its October 6 weekly vaccine safety report, the TGA has investigated 939 reports of death following vaccination.
Only 14 of those deaths have been directly linked to COVID-19 vaccines, of which 13 occurred after one dose of Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca).
But just like covid itself and looking at the media. Fear sells. So mountains get created over mole hills
D
Deleted member 585708
Guest
Does this make it more deadly than the smallpox vaccine?
That has a 1 per million death rate and a 15 per million injury rate.
That is high, and the problem is super visible when vaccinating a population in one go.
The Most Dangerous Vaccine
<b>Dan Rather</b> Reports On The Debate Over Safety Of Smallpox Vaccine
www.cbsnews.com
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2006
- Messages
- 14,247
- Reaction score
- 16,718
Ummmm yes. Major differences. Its one of the biggest issues i have with the term of " vaccine " now adays.Does this make it more deadly than the smallpox vaccine?
That has a 1 per million death rate and a 15 per million injury rate.
That is high, and the problem is super visible when vaccinating a population in one go.
The Most Dangerous Vaccine
<b>Dan Rather</b> Reports On The Debate Over Safety Of Smallpox Vaccine
1 death per million people immunised....... from 1796......
Smallpox is erradicated globally. I didnt get the vaccine along with every australian born after me . Nor has americans bar their military since the 70's. And the risk far outweighs the benifits currently as theres zero risk of gettimg smallpox ( bar warfare really ) so theres the risk outweighs the benifit
Id line straight up for it if smallpox were rereleased... zero qualms at all.
Its the golden standard for me.
1 shot lifetime for a limetimes benifit and global benifit wirh erradication and one death per million people immunised ......
What 8 shots ( prob more ) so far , it will never erradicate covid and even if its 1 death per 5 million it will still annihilate the smallpox vaccine death toll. Because unlike smallpox.. which is no longer profited by or used ( bar us military which is silly but understandable i guess ) theres a cpuple million administered each year... not billion.
To compare the two is honestly one of the things ive disdained the most about the twisting language around " vaccinations and herd immunity "
( not a go at you . That article annoyed me lol )
From your article
"We know if we immunize a million people, that there will be 15 people that will suffer severe, permanent adverse outcomes and one person who may die from the vaccine," says Dr. Paul Offit, one of the country's top infectious disease specialists, and he knows all about vaccines that prevent those diseases. In his lab at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, he studies and creates new vaccines. There's nothing new about the smallpox vaccine.
The vaccine was created in 1796. The vaccine used today is essentially the same, Offit says. "We tend to think of vaccines as being very safe and every effective, which they are. But all the vaccines that we use today are the result of modern technology. That's not true of the smallpox vaccine. It has a side effect profile that we, we would not accept for vaccines today," he says.
oh i definetly think we would accept 15 disabled and 1 dead per million for something as deadly as smallpx........ i find it almost insane to suggest otherwise and to pretend modern meficine is so much safer is a stretch........
1 in a million ... good lord allergies / reactions could take that with almost any substance
1 in a million death rate? Im so confused as to that being nbad when put alongside the benifits
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
- Messages
- 7,689
- Reaction score
- 3,126
Biden gives Pfizer, Moderna immunity from being sued for vax injuries
HHS officials announced they're extending a pandemic-era act that protects doctors, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals from being held liable for some injury claims.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,139
- Reaction score
- 674
Biden gives Pfizer, Moderna immunity from being sued for vax injuries
HHS officials announced they're extending a pandemic-era act that protects doctors, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals from being held liable for some injury claims.www.dailymail.co.uk
More of the same BS from the government. They protect their best interests, not their citizens.
Thankfully I never took any of the so called vaccines so I’m good. But those that were injured should be able to take legal action if they choose.
Sadly I don’t think the vaccine manufacturers will ever be held accountable. Even with RFK Jr. in place now, I’m sure Trump doesn’t want us to remember Operation Warp Speed.
So Biden gives them a pass now and Trump sweeps it under the rug for his 4 years. By 2029 we’ll have a number of other distractions and all the Covid nonsense will be forgotten.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
This bitch needs to STFU. Stay salty
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
Never forget the lies and propaganda.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
LoL. Biden and Fauci are so corrupt.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
Fuck YOU. Never Forget.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
The FDA can never be trusted.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2006
- Messages
- 22,501
- Reaction score
- 31,202
Alberta covid response report recently came out. Holy. Fucking. Shit.
Summary of Key Findings
• Health Canada was solely responsible for approving COVID-19 Vaccines.
• Health Canada’s definition of an “ideal vaccine” is a vaccine that is safe with minimal
adverse effects and effective in providing lifelong protection against disease after a
single dose.
• NACI identified significant gaps in the COVID-19 vaccines during the approval
process. The Task Force did not find discussion of these gaps anywhere in the Alberta
data.
• NACI recommends the COVID-19 vaccines despite the concerning gaps in safety and
efficacy data provided.
• Results of a risk assessment for the Alberta population performed by the Chief
Medical Officer of Health (CMOH) or the Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) are
unknown.
• The highest risk of severe infection was in people 75 years old and older, with two or
more comorbidities. It is unknown why vaccines were aggressively pushed for people
under 60 with much lower risk profiles
• Pfizer vaccine safety data from the three-month post-authorization trial was
alarming.
o 1,223 deaths attributed to the vaccine.
o 42,086 people injured within 4 days of vaccination.
o 45% of these were between the ages of 18-50 (who were at negligible risk from
COVID-19 infection).
• Lipid nanoparticles have a well described toxicity in scientific literature after multiple
injections.
• Pregnant women in the Pfizer randomized controlled trial did not fare well. It is
unknown why vaccines were recommended in Alberta to pregnant women and those
of childbearing age.
• Healthy minors were at low risk of serious COVID-19 infection and yet were
recommended vaccination despite known and unknown safety risks inherent in the
vaccines.
• COVID-19 vaccination carries a well-documented risk for developing myocarditis
and pericarditis. These heart conditions have lifelong and potentially fatal
consequences.
• It is relatively easy to authorize novel therapies under Emergency Use Authorization
but very difficult to halt or discontinue them if concerns are warranted.
• It is very difficult to access relevant vaccine safety and efficacy data in Alberta’s
publicly funded health system.
Summary of Key Findings
• Health Canada was solely responsible for approving COVID-19 Vaccines.
• Health Canada’s definition of an “ideal vaccine” is a vaccine that is safe with minimal
adverse effects and effective in providing lifelong protection against disease after a
single dose.
• NACI identified significant gaps in the COVID-19 vaccines during the approval
process. The Task Force did not find discussion of these gaps anywhere in the Alberta
data.
• NACI recommends the COVID-19 vaccines despite the concerning gaps in safety and
efficacy data provided.
• Results of a risk assessment for the Alberta population performed by the Chief
Medical Officer of Health (CMOH) or the Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) are
unknown.
• The highest risk of severe infection was in people 75 years old and older, with two or
more comorbidities. It is unknown why vaccines were aggressively pushed for people
under 60 with much lower risk profiles
• Pfizer vaccine safety data from the three-month post-authorization trial was
alarming.
o 1,223 deaths attributed to the vaccine.
o 42,086 people injured within 4 days of vaccination.
o 45% of these were between the ages of 18-50 (who were at negligible risk from
COVID-19 infection).
• Lipid nanoparticles have a well described toxicity in scientific literature after multiple
injections.
• Pregnant women in the Pfizer randomized controlled trial did not fare well. It is
unknown why vaccines were recommended in Alberta to pregnant women and those
of childbearing age.
• Healthy minors were at low risk of serious COVID-19 infection and yet were
recommended vaccination despite known and unknown safety risks inherent in the
vaccines.
• COVID-19 vaccination carries a well-documented risk for developing myocarditis
and pericarditis. These heart conditions have lifelong and potentially fatal
consequences.
• It is relatively easy to authorize novel therapies under Emergency Use Authorization
but very difficult to halt or discontinue them if concerns are warranted.
• It is very difficult to access relevant vaccine safety and efficacy data in Alberta’s
publicly funded health system.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2009
- Messages
- 49,816
- Reaction score
- 34,134
So yeah, pages and pages and years and years of CT bullshit all shot to hell:
September, 2024
www.bbc.com
A team of scientists say it is “beyond reasonable doubt” the Covid pandemic started with infected animals sold at a market, rather than a laboratory leak.
They were analysing hundreds of samples collected from Wuhan, China, in January 2020.
The results identify a shortlist of animals – including racoon dogs, civets and bamboo rats – as potential sources of the pandemic.
Despite even highlighting one market stall as a hotspot of both animals and coronavirus, the study cannot provide definitive proof.
The samples were collected by Chinese officials in the early stages of Covid and are one of the most scientifically valuable sources of information on the origins of the pandemic.
An early link with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was established when patients appeared in hospitals in Wuhan with a mystery pneumonia.
The market was closed and teams swabbed locations including stalls, the inside of animal cages and equipment used to strip fur and feathers from slaughtered animals.
Their analysis was published last year and the raw data made available to other scientists. Now a team in the US and France says they have performed even more advanced genetic analyses to peer deeper into Covid’s early days.
It involved analysing millions of short fragments of genetic code – both DNA and RNA – to establish what animals and viruses were in the market in January 2020.
"We are seeing the DNA and RNA ghosts of these animals in the environmental samples, and some are in stalls where [the Covid virus] was found too," says Prof Florence Débarre, of the French National Centre for Scientific Research.
The results, published in the journal Cell, highlight a series of findings that come together to make their case.
It shows Covid virus and susceptible animals were detected in the same location, with some individual swabs collecting both animal and coronavirus genetic code. This is not evenly distributed across the market and points to very specific hotspots.
"We find a very consistent story in terms of this pointing - even at the level of a single stall - to the market as being the very likely origin of this particular pandemic," says Prof Kristian Andersen, from the Scripps Institute in the US.
The lab-leak theory argues that instead of the virus spilling over from wildlife, it instead came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which has long studied coronaviruses.
It is located a 40-minute drive away from the market. The US intelligence community was asked to weigh up the likelihood of a leak – either accidental or deliberate.
In June 2023, all the agencies involved said either a leak or animal origins were plausible scenarios.
The National Intelligence Council and four other agencies said animals were the likely source. The FBI and the Department of Energy thought it was more likely to be a laboratory incident.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66005240
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-57268111
Prof Andersen said: "To many this seems like the most likely scenario - 'the lab is right there, of course it was the lab, are you stupid?'. I totally get that argument."
However, he says there is now plenty of data that "really points to the market as the true early epicentre" and "even locations within that market".
September, 2024
Covid origins: Genetic ghosts suggest pandemic started in market
A team of scientists say it is "beyond reasonable doubt" the Covid pandemic started with infected animals.
www.bbc.com
A team of scientists say it is “beyond reasonable doubt” the Covid pandemic started with infected animals sold at a market, rather than a laboratory leak.
They were analysing hundreds of samples collected from Wuhan, China, in January 2020.
The results identify a shortlist of animals – including racoon dogs, civets and bamboo rats – as potential sources of the pandemic.
Despite even highlighting one market stall as a hotspot of both animals and coronavirus, the study cannot provide definitive proof.
The samples were collected by Chinese officials in the early stages of Covid and are one of the most scientifically valuable sources of information on the origins of the pandemic.
An early link with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was established when patients appeared in hospitals in Wuhan with a mystery pneumonia.
The market was closed and teams swabbed locations including stalls, the inside of animal cages and equipment used to strip fur and feathers from slaughtered animals.
Their analysis was published last year and the raw data made available to other scientists. Now a team in the US and France says they have performed even more advanced genetic analyses to peer deeper into Covid’s early days.
It involved analysing millions of short fragments of genetic code – both DNA and RNA – to establish what animals and viruses were in the market in January 2020.
"We are seeing the DNA and RNA ghosts of these animals in the environmental samples, and some are in stalls where [the Covid virus] was found too," says Prof Florence Débarre, of the French National Centre for Scientific Research.
The results, published in the journal Cell, highlight a series of findings that come together to make their case.
It shows Covid virus and susceptible animals were detected in the same location, with some individual swabs collecting both animal and coronavirus genetic code. This is not evenly distributed across the market and points to very specific hotspots.
"We find a very consistent story in terms of this pointing - even at the level of a single stall - to the market as being the very likely origin of this particular pandemic," says Prof Kristian Andersen, from the Scripps Institute in the US.
The lab-leak theory argues that instead of the virus spilling over from wildlife, it instead came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which has long studied coronaviruses.
It is located a 40-minute drive away from the market. The US intelligence community was asked to weigh up the likelihood of a leak – either accidental or deliberate.
In June 2023, all the agencies involved said either a leak or animal origins were plausible scenarios.
The National Intelligence Council and four other agencies said animals were the likely source. The FBI and the Department of Energy thought it was more likely to be a laboratory incident.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66005240
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-57268111
Prof Andersen said: "To many this seems like the most likely scenario - 'the lab is right there, of course it was the lab, are you stupid?'. I totally get that argument."
However, he says there is now plenty of data that "really points to the market as the true early epicentre" and "even locations within that market".
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2015
- Messages
- 13,863
- Reaction score
- 13,276
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 28,410
- Reaction score
- 25,437
LoL. If you are jabbed be worried.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
- Messages
- 2,915
- Reaction score
- 2,295
Are you still talking about COVID-19? This thing has been talked about for years. Are people still talking about this? This China Virus? That is unbelievable. I can’t believe anyone would ask a question about COVID at a time like this, when the country is experiencing so much success. Except for that thing in Texas.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Umar vs. Merab Round 5 Re-Watch (Scoring Breakdown/Summary/Analysis)- Latest: TheMMAnalyst
-
